|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 02:37 PM Original message |
Radioactive substances in seawater near Japan nuke plant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. With the ever present "not a threat to human health" thrown in for good measure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 02:52 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. no, just fish health that humans might eat later. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. yeah, suddenly these higher levels are 'no danger' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marasinghe (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 07:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
37. no problem. the Japanese govt. will reset the danger level with a decree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
3. 100 km south? Did they sample the water closer? Of course there is stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. Other reports say 100 m - someone need to edit these things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. NHK says the tests were done 100 METERS from the plant. a meter isn't a kilometer, or a mile. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
4. FUCK!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtuck004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:29 PM Response to Original message |
5. Dropping water from helicopters onto reactors which are spewing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Not enough resources is right, the world need to be there or we are all skrewed nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
7. MSNBC...Tokyo residents told do NOT drink the tap water? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 03:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. In Tokyo? Are you sure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. that's what I think also..I was watching .Dylan Radigan and he was having it out with a frenchmen... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Some Fukushima prefecture residents have been told not to drink tap water. In Tokyo, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:13 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. that makes more sense..they had to have scrambled the reports....I was watching Dylan Radigan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaPera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
9. WOW - What a surprise! How could this be explained? - I'm stumped! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoutport (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
11. 60 miles is not "NEAR"!!! and does it radiate to the north, east, west? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
humus (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. evaporates and is wind blown to western U.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:21 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Wikipedia articles on the ocean currents off Japan, and the Fukushima plant, showing its location |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 02:32 AM Response to Reply #11 |
30. The actual distance from the plant was 100 METERS. That's .062 of a mile. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DLnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
17. Very helpful would be some actual numbers. What level was detected? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DLnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-23-11 02:11 AM Response to Reply #17 |
39. Finally found a number close to the government-set standard, apparently: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
18. This gieger counter in Tokyo... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DLnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
19. So 126.7 times the government-set standards is "not a threat to human |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 10:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. The purpose is to prevent "chronic" contamination from building... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DLnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 12:27 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Nice post, but somewhat patronizing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 01:47 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. You're asking the wrong question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DLnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 09:23 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Patronizing, lacking facts and spinning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-23-11 02:07 AM Response to Reply #32 |
38. I have no idea. You could google it as easily as I could. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DLnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 01:04 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Also, that chart is a little inaccurate, I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-21-11 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
20. duh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
25. NHK is reporting that the test was done 100 METERS south of the plant. big difference/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 08:53 AM Response to Reply #25 |
31. I've used the Alert link to contact the moderators to ask that a note be added to the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Agony (865 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 01:58 AM Response to Original message |
28. the actual Tepco report 100 meters w/data |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 02:15 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. thank you. i'll link that in the GD thread on the error. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baclava (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
33. SHIT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
34. Thanks for editing with the correct info. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 02:21 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. You're welcome! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-22-11 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
36. New reports today. Yesterday's was about radiation at 100 meters. Today's tests at 10 miles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC