Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Pulling Back in Afghan Valley It Called Vital to War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 01:11 PM
Original message
U.S. Pulling Back in Afghan Valley It Called Vital to War
Source: New York Times

KABUL, Afghanistan — After years of fighting for control of a prominent valley in the rugged mountains of eastern Afghanistan, the United States military has begun to pull back most of its forces from ground it once insisted was central to the campaign against the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

The withdrawal from the Pech Valley, a remote region in Kunar Province, formally began on Feb. 15. The military projects that it will last about two months, part of a shift of Western forces to the province’s more populated areas. Afghan units will remain in the valley, a test of their military readiness.

While American officials say the withdrawal matches the latest counterinsurgency doctrine’s emphasis on protecting Afghan civilians, Afghan officials worry that the shift of troops amounts to an abandonment of territory where multiple insurgent groups are well established, an area that Afghans fear they may not be ready to defend on their own.

And it is an emotional issue for American troops, who fear that their service and sacrifices could be squandered. At least 103 American soldiers have died in or near the valley’s maze of steep gullies and soaring peaks, according to a count by The New York Times, and many times more have been wounded, often severely.



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/25/world/asia/25afghanistan.html?_r=1&hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Occupations only ever end one way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The Occupation of North America by Europeans was successful,
..though they DID have to slaughter the indigenous population, steal all their land, and imprison the handful that remained.

Something like that might work in Afghanistan...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Do you see millions lining up to emigrate to Afghanistan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. I could see myself in large field of Poppies.
Beautiful flowers!


One more good surge ought to do it!
I can see a light at the end of the tunnel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. emigrate |ˈemiˌgrāt| Leave one's own country in order to settle permanently in anothe...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Immigration, not occupation.
There is a difference between immigration and occupation. Europeans occupied South America perhaps, but they immigrated to North America, just as the Asian ancestors of the Indians had many centuries before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Immigration means becoming assimilated within the existing culture.
That did NOT happen in North America.
The lands were taken FROM the existing peoples who were displaced.
There was a very organized US Military Operation to "clear" the "Indians/Savages" from the western territories to make the West "safe for settlers" after the Civil War.
I've always found it ironic that the same army that Freed the Black Man in the South
was used to commit genocide against the Red Man in the West.

When the Asian ancestors immigrated here many centuries ago, they did not displace an indigenous people...at least none that the archeologists have identified.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Immigration is derived from immigration which, according to my dictionary
Edited on Fri Feb-25-11 04:36 PM by JDPriestly
means 1. to come to a country of which one is not a native, usu. for permanent residence. 2. organisms found in a new habitat. 3. to introduce as settlers.

That is from Random House Webster's Dictionary 2nd ed. 1997

Assimilation is not a factor in the definition of immigration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. OTOH, the definition of "Occupation":
"Control of a territory by a military force."

I wonder why all those early settlements were called "Forts"?
...especially in the American West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AKDavy Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. No matter what happens
Losing this war will somehow be portrayed as having "met our objectives."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I would be OK with that.
Just declare "Mission Accomplished" and get the hell out.
Iraq too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AKDavy Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. The mission has been accomplished
The Power Elite has made a profit on death and suffering.

The end of the war isn't going to be a function of mission completion, it's a question of greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ceveritt Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Afghanistan ...
... has long been known as the graveyard of empires.

Recall the first Anglo-Afghan War.

Bring the troops home now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Populist_Prole Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I wish they'd just declare "mission accomplished" and get out of there
Let the semantics sort themselves out. Seems to be the only way out really. It's totally unwinnable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. be the poppy fields...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. I find the whole thing insane
Trillions of dollars to chase tribesmen around mountains THEY have lived in for centuries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julian09 Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. How long does it take to train Afghan army
seems the Taliban are better than US at training their side.
Got to keep the corruption going, I guess.
A US or NATO service member would be on their third deployment before an Afghan can stand up for HIS country.
How many coalition soldiers died in that valley for their Afghan freedom, make the whole place a mine field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gimama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. goood points..
& Welcome to DU, YOU!:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreamnightwind Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Seriously?
"How many coalition soldiers died in that valley for their Afghan freedom, make the whole place a mine field."

You think our people have been dying for their freedom? We're so altruistic, amazing how good-hearted the US is. (

If this was an actual indigenous revolution we were supporting, their people would be quite capable of being trained and mobilizing security forces. They're less capable when they're not particularly excited about the job we're telling them they have to do. They're not convinced it's in the interest of their people.

The Afghan people didn't ask us to join them in a fight for freedom. We invaded their country, then dug in for a seemingly endless occupation while we trained police and troops to protect our interests over there, which have little to do with their freedom.

I think we've done quite enough phony liberating for awhile.

Apologies in advance if I misunderstood your post. I can't stand to see the people of an invaded, bombed and occupied country being blamed for their lack of enthusiasm to serve their new masters.
`
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLovinLug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. "sacrifices could be squandered'
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand the "looney left" will be once again (sadly) correct about this as well.

From - sacrifices will NOT be squandered

to - sacrifices COULD be squandered

and soon - sacrifices HAVE been squandered
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sonoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. "The next three months are critical."
How many time have we heard that malarkey?

There was just no way our troops could handle that terrain.

Sonoman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. a modified friedman..
Edited on Fri Feb-25-11 03:43 PM by frylock
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman_(unit)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. would you like fries with your hamburger hill?
wtf obama? what. the. fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
M155Y_A1CH Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kick
In case this was missed in the Friday news dump.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC