Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(California) Governor defends tax vote, blasts opponents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 01:03 AM
Original message
(California) Governor defends tax vote, blasts opponents
Source: San Francisco Chronicle

(02-24) 13:08 PST SACRAMENTO -- Gov. Jerry Brown defended his budget plan and pressed GOP lawmakers to allow voters to weigh in on tax extensions and increases during a highly unusual appearance before the Legislature's budget conference committee on Thursday.

In a lively, hour-long appearance, the Democrat criticized the 30 Republican lawmakers who announced a new "taxpayers caucus" Wednesday aimed at opposing Brown's plan to put $14 billion in tax increases before voters in June. The governor proposed the tax extensions and increases, as well as deep cuts to state programs, in order to close the state's $26.6 billion budget shortfall.

"Pledges are interesting, they make good theater," Brown said. "But the fact is we have to have a plan, we need a solution, and for those who say they don't want to vote, then why are you here? And if you're going to be here, give us some ideas."

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/02/24/BA6R1HU209.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dd2003 Donating Member (198 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. more taxes in taxifornia
This is the one issue I always feel may lead people to voting republican in CA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Your solution would be???
Given that the former Governor already showed that if he cut all state spending (police, fire, teachers, medical, etc) the state would still be in the red.

BTW: Taxifornia. Did you make that up yourself? Cuz I've heard many republicans use that term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhill926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. uhhhhhh.....yep......
Edited on Fri Feb-25-11 02:32 AM by dhill926
republicans use that term...it's stupid.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
25. Yeah, Taxifornia = kinda weak.
Taxachusetts at least has that almost-internal-rhyme-if-we-allow-for-some-creative-license thing goin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Taxes to pay for services provided? I'd vote to raise them.
As long as it is across the board. The selfish rich have to pull their share of the load too, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Taxifornia? California is only 11th among states in taxation.
Your Republican Alaska is highest in state taxation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_tax_levels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Trying to confuse us by posting facts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. facts have a notorious liberal bias
soundbites from AM radio talk shows are much more "truthy"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Alaska has no State income tax nor a state sales tax
The taxes you are referring to are on the oil industry and they are no where near as high as the taxes placed on the oil industry in the Gulf states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. California has no taxes on oil
it is the only major oil producing state to not tax oil extraction

Maybe Alaksa is doing something right here?

You may want to also note the tax benefits of prop 13 to large corporate land holdings. Prop 13 makes no distinction between homeowners and corporate real estate. Long term corporate land owners have made out like bandits in low taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Yeah, really. I live in Connecticut and we are #6.
Cry me a river. I am really used to paying for what we get. Rather live in CT then some crappy southern low tax state with education levels in the toilet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Having lived in the Norquistian paradise of Texas
and in California, all I can say is, you get what you pay for. I regret not a cent I pay of California taxes, and there isn't enough money that could make me move back to Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fittosurvive Donating Member (538 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. Nevertheless, the Texas economy is doing quite well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Doing quite well for some, not so well for the rest. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Texas has the highest percent without health insurance
and many other measures of human well being are shockingly low for most of the population

And now Texas has a California-sized budget deficit - with no unions to blame for it.


Texas lags far behind California in major research universities, patents produced, high-tech infrastructure and venture capital investment, according to the Missouri-based Kauffman Foundation. The foundation's 2010 ranking of states in "movement toward a global, innovation-based new economy" put California at No. 7. Texas was No. 18.

"Their model is a low-wage economy with greater income inequality," said John Ellwood, a professor of public policy at UC Berkeley. "For all the talk of Texas being a high-tech state, they have never really caught up to California.… Look at the big new growth companies. Where is Facebook? Where is Google? Are any of these companies in Austin? No."

Even Perry's claims of companies that have decamped from California to lay down roots in Texas appear to be overblown. When the Austin American-Statesman looked into the Texas governor's boast that there were 153 such companies in 2010, reporters found the claim included California firms that stayed put but maybe opened a Texas branch. The newspaper concluded that Perry's figure was grossly inflated.


from http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-texas-budget-20110207,0,4154023.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Texas is all about money, about sucking up to people with money.
Yeah, I liked that piece you posted too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. Um, not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. The only alternative is cutting social services so much that they don't cover anyone anymore
And reducing environmental and labor regulations to nothing.

What's the point of defeating republicans and then governing LIKE them(which is what sticking to a "no new taxes" position would have to mean)?

One party of the right is enough. There's no way to make "small government" progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueMTexpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Looks as if you've outed yourself already. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. S/he registered in September 2008, so it wasn't all that fast after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Taxes were part of Reagan's version of the Southern strategy.
Edited on Fri Feb-25-11 05:08 AM by No Elephants
This is from an anonymous interview given by Lee Atwater to political Scientist Alexander P. Lamis in 1981, during the Reagan administration. Lamis identified Atwater in his book, The Two-Party South, when the book was reprinted in Southern Politics in the 1990s.


"Atwater: As to the whole Southern strategy that Harry S. Dent, Sr. and others put together in 1968, opposition to the Voting Rights Act would have been a central part of keeping the South. Now doesn’t have to do that. All you have to do to keep the South is for Reagan to run in place on the issues he's campaigned on since 1964 and that's fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole cluster.

Questioner But the fact is, isn't it, that Reagan does get to the Wallace voter and to the racist side of the Wallace voter by doing away with legal services, by cutting down on food stamps?

Atwater: You start out in 1954 by saying, "N*gger, n*gger, n*gger." By 1968 you can't say "n*gger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rightsand all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "N*gger, n*gger."<6><7>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Atwater


Good ole, jovial Dutch Reagan, everyone's favorite President, eh?




Atwater was a member of Ronnie's admin. He was deputy director of Reagan's second campaign and headed Poppy Bush's first campaign, during which he and Dummya became good friends. Then, he headed the RNC until he died at age 40. Atwater had also managed Karl Rove's campaign for the national chairman of the College Republicans. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Rove

IOW, we were under the influence of this turd for 5 Presidential terms.

*(Wiki spells out the n word. I put in askerisks.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. "Taxifornia?"
Really???? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
delunapark Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Amazing............Taxafornia
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. Homes in my neighborhood sell for $800,000
my property taxes are lower than my in-laws' home in Indiana, worth maybe $150,000

What's this about high taxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Yep, without going into particulars, my net property tax rate is .67%.
Including everything, per year. Just makes your blood curdle thinking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Just think of the deal the Kern County Land Company gets for its farmland in the central valley
or, I'd love to see what Universal pays in property taxes on its corporate compound here in LA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. or all of the foreign owned office buildings
in LA. if prop 13 was limited to non investment residential properties, you could just imagine the bucks that would be pouring in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. It's based on what you actually paid, rather than some abstraction of present market value
The state balances out controlled property taxes by having very high sales tax (highly regressive, yes) and high, very progressive income tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. It is a very thorny problem, but the current system is a failure.
I think it might be a good idea to start over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. Yeah right
I'm sure taxing oil and gas extraction will massively shift the electoral landscape.

You do know California is the only major oil producing state to not tax? Texas, Alaska ("permanent fund"?), Oklahoma, all levy taxes. CA doesn't

Or maybe reversing the billions of dollars in large corporate tax cuts the Republicans forced as their concession for passing a budget?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. Portmanteau of "Tax" and name of blue state => no need to say anything else. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
15. Attaboy Jerry, hammer and tongs, don't let the whiners slide.
"But the fact is we have to have a plan, we need a solution, and for those who say they don't want to vote, then why are you here? And if you're going to be here, give us some ideas."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC