Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Friend Of Rep. Shot In Rampage Shares Eerie E-Mail

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 03:59 PM
Original message
Friend Of Rep. Shot In Rampage Shares Eerie E-Mail
Source: thebostonchannel

BOSTON -- A friend of the Arizona congresswoman who was shot and seriously injured in a shooting rampage this weekend is sharing an e-mail she wrote the day before the massacre.

...

"(Giffords) is a good enough friend that I wanted her to be on that short list of people that I was telling about my new announcement," Trey Grayson, who was just named Harvard Institute of Politics director.

Grayson, who is still Kentucky's secretary of state, received a congratulatory e-mail from Giffords last Friday, one day before the shooting in Arizona.

"It really is kind of eerie some of which she was talking about," he said.

In the e-mail, Giffords wrote, "after you get settled, I would love to talk about what we can do to promote centrism and moderation ... We need to figure out how to tone our rhetoric and partisanship down."

"She and I had talked about it over the years," Grayson said. "Which is really this tone and rhetoric that's gotten out of control."

Read more: http://www.thebostonchannel.com/r/26452045/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. We need to figure out how to tone our rhetoric and partisanship down
We need to figure out how to tone our rhetoric and partisanship down."

"She and I had talked about it over the years," Grayson said. "Which is really this tone and rhetoric that's gotten out of control."


And sadly, ironically, the partisans are ratchetting it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Promoting centrism and moderation is an excellent goal
Giffords could have been our first female POTUS. Still can, if she's willing and able..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Look, the center has moved so far to the right, thanks to the
extremist rhetoric, that I, who was a centrist most of my life, can no longer support it. The term "centrist" means something different to each individual. It is meaningless.

I am a Democrat, a nonviolent Democrat.

We should not all feel compelled to follow the leadership of centrists. I would speak out strongly against any "centrist" who wanted to lower Social Security benefits, for example. I think that the selling of the extension of the tax cuts for the rich as a "centrist" measure was quite dishonest. That was a radically conservative measure.

Centrism is a term that is defined subjectively.

The issue is not centrism. The issues are extremist rhetoric and action and the use of violent metaphors and images in political speech.

Television programs in which guests are not given enough time to explain in a little depth their points of view, programs in which people are permitted to talk over each other and aggressively try to prevent the others on the program from being heard need to change their tone. If you have something worthwhile to say, if your ideas make sense and stand the test of rational discussion, then you do not need to scream over those who disagree with you.

So the issue is nonviolence not only in actions but in communication. It is unacceptable for people to attend town hall meetings and scream to such an extent that speakers cannot be heard. That was the technique of the Tea-Baggers and has also, sometimes, been the technique of some on the left.

It is not a matter of political point of view. It is a matter of civil discourse, of showing respect for those who disagree with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Far right loons say
Centrist don't exist. "They're just fence sitters afraid to take a stand".

How do you deal with that mind set? It's all Us or them now~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. You should make this an OP.
It's an extremely important point that you make. Certainly the vitriol and lack of respect need to change. And while it certainly sounds good to promote centrism, as you say, the word really has no true meaning when it comes to politics. If scientists were "centrists", they'd have to think that the earth could just as well be 6,000 years old opposed to several billion. People should be encouraged to promote a political system that most accurately reflects their views, that's the heart of democracy. It's how they go about promoting that system that needs to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. +100
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. +1
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 03:59 AM by No Elephants
Oddly enough, I thought I WAS a centrist Dem until I got bored posting with Republicons and came to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. Much agreed
Partisanship is not evil per se. In fact, I'd like to see a bit more of it from Democrats and a little less conciliation. But there is no need for hate speech, threats, or promotion of violence. Just reasonable disagreement between rational people. Is that too much to ask?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. No ... we have one right wing party now and one radical right wing party ....
anyone in the center of that is on the RIGHT!

Look to FDR for guidance on appropriate response!!

Pretty much nothing he didn't comment on!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. + 1. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. +1 Or LBJ or RFK or HST or HHH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. it's a goal that becomes ever more difficult as the economic divide widens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. no, it's not... I think the Democratic Party has been watered down enough
thanks but no thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Today "Centrism" is just another word for Reaganism. Old Right Wing politics
There's no way in Hell that I'd ever sign on to "Centrism" for what it now represents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. +1000% .... exactly!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. I disagree. We should have at least two clearly distinguishable Parties, else we will have beauty
(or wealth) contests instead of elections, or elect those who are best at dodging the tough issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Agree --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. Are you seriously suggesting that a blue dog could win the
Democratic nomination? Had she not been shot, most on DU would be castigating her. If you think I'm wrong, name another blue dog you would support during the primaries..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. Suuuuure, if you want the teabaggers kicking sand in your face every day at the beach
Otherwise, what everyone else said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. The problem with centrism is that it serves the status quo, even an unsustainable one.
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 04:23 PM by leveymg
That feeds the centripital forces that drive the left-out extremes toward conflict. The moderate center grows increasingly disconnected from the rest. The result of a centrist-dominated system is eventual chaos.

Sorry. But the Middle Way is what got us to this precipice. They're incapable of real reform, are intolerant of radical change, even if it's the only way to prevent the system from destroying itself.

Pleasantries and good manners are nice. But, that won't save us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. When lies and sleight-of-hand proceedures
are the bread and butter of a party's MO, it takes unreasonable bluster and heated rhetoric to convince your base that you're working on their behalf. When the leader of the house dismisses the CBO's projections as "their opinion", THAT right there is all you need to know about the sincerity and forthrightness of the party he commands. So - talk nicey-nice with the cretins and expect them to go thru a metamorphisis of reason and truth??? Hell, Obama's been trying that tactic for TWO years and it's only cost us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not responding is certainly not the way, however -- think we have to look to FDR ... for replies!!
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 04:32 PM by defendandprotect
Requires strong, educatonal responses -- but calling the crooks "crooks" and the

"banksters" just that!

It also involves denying the right wing an audience -- turn off the TV's!!!

And, when KO or Maddow report on the right wing ... I don't want to see huge videos

of them and a full report on what they said. Do they honestly think that's what they

would do for us?

No -- show them in small pics with a line thru their faces --

Stop promoting right wingers like Newt and Palin as though they have some real meaning!

They don't -- they are simply the destroyers -- always have been.

True of the entire right wing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DumpDavisHogg Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. We must start at the LOCAL level
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 06:27 PM by DumpDavisHogg
We can't just focus on national elections. History shows us that big ideas usually get their start at the local level.

A lot of us live near big cities that have been reliably Democratic for years. We'll have a lot more success getting our ideas enacted there than nationally. And if Congress says no, we can just say, "Bite me, Congress. We're paying more than our share of taxes."

Let's take our ideas to city hall, not Congress. Most of Congress doesn't listen or care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
25. I agree, but we should not have to "start" to be Democrats.
If I wanted to start something, it would be a new party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Well, that's a lingering question .....
i.e., "Is there anything left of the Dem Party worth saving or able to be saved?"

and wonder if it can be honestly answered here at DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Agree with your overall idea ...
however, our state and local governments -- at least here in NJ -- were taken

over long ago by wealthy. Despite the fact that in NJ we still have a lot of

Dems in office!

Trust you might have fared better?

But still -- agree with you that pushing against it can't hurt -- Greens have

made some inroads in local stuff.

Another problem is talking to your neighbor! That's always a fully charged situation,

especially since so many have swalled the right wing propaganda over the last decades.

Lies between us like landmines!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. A civil but vibrant discourse, not centrism.
With great admiration for a remarkable person, I respectfully disagree with Rep. Giffords. My views on immigration are not centrist in this time and place, but they should be. By that I mean that in my opinion this country should move its center and it is both my right and duty to work on making the center move. To respond to those who resort to violence by deferring to their views at the expense of my own would be to give up and abandon any dream of a democratic (small d) nation. A vibrant civil discourse is one (but not the only one) of the essential elements of a democracy. I dream that one day we will be such a democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. "Centrism" doesn't exist in this country
Half of the nation is living in an alternate reality created by Fox News and the entire country is suffering because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. Interesting choice of words ...
We need to figure out how to tone our rhetoric and partisanship down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. Yes, she meant Dems. OF COURSE, I am hoping and, yes, praying, for her full recovery, but
Edited on Wed Jan-12-11 04:32 AM by No Elephants
because she is a human (by all reports, a very lovely person, too), not necessarily bc I agree with her politics.

If she meant vote classic Dem, but tone down your rhetoric so Dems get elected, i am more than fine with her sentiment.

If she meant, Dems need to take 3 Umbrella Steps to the right so DINOs get eleted, i'm not a fan of all her political views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's time for a re-alignment
Who in this nation represents the best of the Republican Party? The Republican Party that rejected witch hunts, that understood the value of things like an interstate highway building program to keep infrastructure and this nation strong, that recognized the need for a social safety net and taxation that paid for it?

The same Republicans that left the party and endorsed Obama in 2008.

The reality is that Fox News and its mouthpieces have pulled the Republican Party so far to the right it is now the party of extremists. In order to find voices of moderation, Republicans need to engage in bipartisanship to indicate that they recognize the damage their own party has caused in weakening our nation by giving too much power to corporate interests and no power to the common interests.

Teddy Roosevelt understood this when he busted monopolies and brought down the gilded age fat cats so that they were not more powerful than the govt. in influence.

The Republican Party that now exists, with Palin as a spokesperson for the hateful teabaggers - that party needs to distance itself from those people. It needs to stop funding them.

It needs to stop taking money from powerful interests that support undermining this nation by destroying the middle class.

And, when pigs fly, I guess we'll see that happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
27.  interstate highway building program was for defense (nominally, anyway) and for
auto manufacturers and oil companies. http://www.crossingwallstreet.com/archives/2009/06/whats-good-for-general-motors-is-good-for-america.html

Anyway, I believe a Dem Congress was responsible for a national highway system. Ike did not veto, though, that's true. However, Adlai Stevenson was far superior in so many ways to school segregationist General Eisenhower.

Rich Teddy Roosevelt left the Republicon Party--after it left him.

Sorry, after Abe Lincoln, Republicons were always worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. It needs to stop taking money from powerful interests that support undermining this nation ...
by destroying the middle class" --

Unfortunately, we also have a Democratic Party doing the sasme thing ---

and we have to equally call upon them to STOP!

The people funding the T-BAGGERS -- Koch Bros/oil industry -- are the same people

who funded the John Birch Society -- but the reality is the T-BAGGERS are bought

and paid for and run by Dick Armey and out of a PR firm which guarantees them

coverage!

They are also the same people traditionally funding the GOP -- and the GOP gave

start up funding for the "Christian Coalition" -- Richard Scaife funded Dobson's

organization -- and other wealthy right wingers funded Bauer's organization.

Ir's all bought and paid for --

It's the only way the right wing can rise -- buying support -- and using political

violence!

Faux News is also doing what the right wing elites want it to do -- the reason for

their creation.

T-BAGGERS, Republican Party, Wealthy elites -- all the same people --

Same for "Pro-life" murderers and NRA -- gun manufacturers ---

All part of the same thing.

The right wing can only rise via political violence -- and they need more of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. Centrist = Lukewarm
luke·warm - Adjective: tepid, indifferent, listless, warmish, unenthusiastic


- Lukewarm? Naw you can keep it. Nothing ever gets done with lukewarm. Lukewarm is only good for cleaning permanent press clothing......

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC