Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UK imposes new permanent immigration quota

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ginto Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 10:42 PM
Original message
UK imposes new permanent immigration quota
Source: AP

LONDON – Britain will impose a tough annual limit on the number of non-Europeans allowed to work in the U.K. and slash visas for overseas students as it seeks to dramatically reduce immigration, the government said Tuesday.

Home Secretary Theresa May told the House of Commons that the number of non-EU nationals permitted to work in the U.K. from April 2011 will be capped at about 22,000 — a reduction of about one-fifth from 2009.

But thousands of people who are allowed to work in Britain on intracompany transfers aren't included in those figures — or under the new quota. Critics said that means it's unclear how Prime Minister David Cameron's government will meet a pledge to cut net immigration, which also includes students and families of visa holders, to below 100,000 by 2015, from about 196,000 last year.

"We can't go on like this, we must tighten up our immigration system," May told legislators as she announced details of the new rules.

Public anxiety over immigration — and the burden on public services caused by new arrivals — was a key issue during the country's national election, when then-leader Gordon Brown was angrily challenged by an elderly voter over workers arriving from eastern Europe.


Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/eu_britain_immigration_cuts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, the U.K.'s bigotry against brown people is in full display
Gotta keep out them furriners, the other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right, because all EU residents are white.
And all non-EU residents are brown. You really need to educate yourself about Britain's immigration policy before you play the "Oh noes, they're racist!" card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thank you. You beat
me to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Who are they referring to then?
From the article in the OP:

May said those seeking a marriage visa will in the future need to prove they have a minimum standard of English.

Her ministry will also develop plans to drastically reduce Britain's foreign student population, likely allowing entry only to those working on college degrees, or more advanced qualifications.

She told lawmakers there would be a more stringent regime to check the credentials of schools that offer visas to overseas students. Police and security officials have recently raised concerns over the education system being targeted by terrorists to gain permission to live in Britain.


I wonder what countries of origin they think these would-be terrorists are coming from, and what color they may be? Maybe they're flying in from the south of France? Switzerland, perhaps? No, definitely Austria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. There are several Americans on DU, and many other people I know,
that want to emigrate to the UK but cannot because of immigration restrictions. We are not part of the EU, hence Americans immigration will also be limited by this change.

And yes, the Brits have been having a problem with people applying for student visas simply to get into the country, then staying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaybeat Donating Member (729 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, we're stuck on this sinking ship and can't get off
After visiting a friend in Scotland this summer, my kids and I would move there in a second. But no-can-do. Even if I wanted to come over as a self-employed person, I'd need almost $400K cash in hand to qualify as an "entrepreneur."

Oh, and I'm as white as the driven snow, so I honestly don't think it's about race. The Tories won't raise taxes on the wealthy, so they're cutting back on social services. Only they can't do that much or they'll get voted out. (Brit voters aren't nearly so dumb as we are, most of the time.) So they're trying to close the gates behind them to keep what they've got. Can't blame them, but I expect the banksters will come after them, too, eventually. (You didn't think they'd stop with Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain, did you? Effective social-welfare programs anywhere in the world are a threat to their hegemony and personal wealth, so it's only a matter of time before they declare that the "markets" are forcing a choice between "austerity" and collapse, for the UK and everywhere else.)

Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I hope the Brits are smarter than we are -
even if it means that my friends can't immigrate, I'd like to see the UK salvage a reasonably good system. A few years ago a friend in Wales had breast cancer; she survived due to surgery and chemo, but said she couldn't imagine having to worry about paying medical bills while she was recovering. There's more to the UK system than just the NHA, but her words really bring home to me the difference of living in a country that has a responsive social welfare system, and living in the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. The will be apply to everyone, but are targeted at those from the subcontinent and Africa
who immigrate from former British colonies in large numbers. (Unfortunately, the UK does not count the US as a "former colony" when it comes to immigration privileges. We should have been more patient, like Canada, about the whole "independence" thing. :) )

Poll taxes and tests in the American South during Jim Crow applied to everyone by the letter of the law (and may have disenfranchised a few poor whites to make things look "fair") but they were targeted at African Americans to keep them from voting. Just because immigration restrictions may seem "fair" and apply to everyone that doesn't mean that they will not have a disparate effect on people of color (and quite intentionally so - remember these are conservatives enacting this legislation).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-23-10 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The point is that non-EU countries are not
JUST nations that are primarily 'brown'.

The United States is a non-EU country. To suggest that this is a policy designed to keep out ONLY 'brown' people is uninformed, at best.

As for terrorists, you pulled one comment out of one article. Try following the entire debate for awhile and you'll notice that it isn't just about terrorism or other security fears.

Or you can continue to be convinced you know all about it based on one comment in one article.

Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think Island nations are more realistic about population limits than others
...not that the article places it in that context, but I have seen more "carrying capacity" type analyses from Britain than elsewhere. Of course limiting immigration isn't any kind of a solution to population problems "outside", but it is one tool a national government has to manage the best interests of its citizenry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. The UK Conservative government never liked non whites or any foreigners
remember Enoch Powell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yep. No surprise this is happening under a the new UK Conservative government.
Conservatives in Europe are good at playing the anti-immigrant card (an easy card to play in almost any country on any continent) to win votes. This shifts the blame for economic problems from the economically powerful to those pesky "others" which suits the rich folks just fine. (Don't look at the man behind the curtain! Watch out for those people who talk with an accent!)

Come to think of it, conservatives in the US are playing the same card (Secure the border! Keep the tax cuts for everyone!) while trying to maintain tax cuts for the rich and seeking to cut "entitlements" and other already-weak safety net programs.

What would conservatives do if they didn't have immigrants to bash as a diversion from their own responsibility for our problems? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. "Public anxiety over immigration — and the burden on public services caused by new arrivals"...
...who are mostly from Europe. I saw the BBC's "Secret Millionaire" the other day and there was a couple from Poland who had come over to Britain to have babies because the husband couldn't find work in Poland. That's just one example but I have family and friends in England and have heard many similar stories. There are a lot of Polish people (and other Europeans) in Britain who work very hard, of course. However, there are also a lot of immigrants from mostly newly joined countries who are going there to take advantage of the school, health and welfare system. That's the core problem.

Asylum seekers and refugees have to go through a very strict vetting system before they can get the tiny amount of assistance available. Illegal immigrants can't claim any benefits. Neither can non European spouses of British citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Bye!!!!
"Muzzy"....:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Is that what they told you before you escaped from the Loony Bin?
I think that they're calling you back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-24-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Whoa! What did I miss?
Sounds like it was enlightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarsInHerHair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
18. so if I married a U.K. guy I'd have no access to their social
services? -----> "Neither can non European spouses of British citizens" I am American, but it sounds like I'd be a second-class citizen if I lived over there. I don't know how to read that any other way, Michael Moore made the U.K. seem really nice & France as well. But....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. If you married a UK guy and wanted to move there, you'd have to follow their very strict rules
Edited on Thu Nov-25-10 03:59 AM by Turborama
One of them is that, to get in, your husband would have to prove that he can support you without having to rely on "public funds".

http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&&sa=X&ei=ViDuTJjhI8-XcfKrqaIK&ved=0CBQQvwUoAQ&q=UK+Border+Agency+spouse+visa&spell=1

I know this because I have friends who are going through the application process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarsInHerHair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. wow, I had no idea-they never mention this in their tourism ads
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-25-10 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. You check tourism ads for marriage & benefit information?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC