Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox News chief Roger Ailes apologises after describing NPR as 'Nazis'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:20 PM
Original message
Fox News chief Roger Ailes apologises after describing NPR as 'Nazis'
Source: Guardian

Fox News chief Roger Ailes apologises after describing NPR as 'Nazis'
Roger Ailes, the head of Fox News, blasts NPR as 'Nazis' and calls Jon Stewart's act 'horseshit' in a bile-filled interview
Posted by
Richard Adams Thursday 18 November 2010 21.31 GMT
guardian.co.uk

http://static.guim.co.uk.nyud.net:8090/sys-images/Media/Pix/pictures/2008/11/21/RogerAiles_AP460.jpg

Roger Ailes, Fox News chairman, says NPR is run by Nazis.
Photograph: AP

Roger Ailes, the head of Rupert Murdoch's Fox News cable channel, was forced to back down on Thursday after describing America's National Public Radio staff as "Nazis".

In an interview, Ailes attacked NPR's management for its dismissal of commentator Juan Williams over remarks about Muslims and terrorism while appearing on Fox News. Ailes told the Daily Beast website:
They are, of course, Nazis. They have a kind of Nazi attitude. They are the left wing of Nazism. These guys don't want any other point of view. They don't even feel guilty using tax dollars to spout their propaganda.
Hours after the interview appeared, setting off a flurry of controversy, Ailes was quick to apologise by sending a letter to the national director of the Anti-Defamation League: "I was of course ad-libbing and should not have chosen that word but I was angry at the time because of NPR's willingness to censor Juan Williams for not being liberal enough."




Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/richard-adams-blog/2010/nov/18/roger-ailes-fox-news-npr-nazis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Too late, he gave away his mindset.
Helps explain the bile on Fox news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. If I am not mistaken that firing happened quite awhile ago
Either he is really slow in getting his news or
he might just be a dumb fat idiot.

If he knew of it when it happened then he is really, really slow in getting his thoughts together.
Looking at him and his waddle he might just have fat for brains
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fuck you, Ailes, you miserable excuse for a human being.
'Ad libbing' my ass. That's exactly how you think and speak when the microphones are turned off. He's a piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blacksheep214 Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Well said! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Roger Ailes is Hitler. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. By "not liberal enough" he means "racist" and "unwilling to comply with his contract." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grassy Knoll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Apologies to ADL...
but not to NPR, just covering that huge ass/mouth of yours, eh Roger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why do these assholes all look the same?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. From drinking the blood of innocent babies
n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. LIke a ham with glasses. God, so true. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. When you point a finger . . .
. . . you have three pointed back at yourself. Unless it's the middle finger, of course, which I proudly point at that arsehole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iliyah Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. They are
the new Nazis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. (Ailes&co.) In Freudian psychology, Psychological projection or
Edited on Thu Nov-18-10 11:38 PM by Amonester
projection bias is a psychological defense mechanism where a person unconsciously denies their own attributes, thoughts, and emotions, which are then ascribed to the outside world, such as to the weather, or to other people. Thus, it involves imagining or projecting that others have those feelings.

Quick source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

American Liberty League = precurser to the Tea Party
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=9551443&mesg_id=9552060

(Video)Secrets of The CIA - In Bed With The Nazis
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=385&topic_id=18193

("carefully" hidden History, for those who choose to not search for it)
Know your BFEE: The Secret Government
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5027094

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. the first thing that came to my mind is
"love means never having to say you're sorry".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well, I'm gonna hafta say...
... While I think Roger's mistaken in his ASSessments, if ANYONE is qualified to identify HORSESHIT, it ought to be Roger Ailes. For someone who generates the stuff from both ends - daily - he's got to have a connoisseur's awareness of it.

As for the Nazi references, that whole damned FAUX gang is in love with Hitler and his crew. They really don't KNOW of anything else to compare to!:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Goddamnit...
The Nazi party was a fucking RIGHT WING PHENOMENA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. The Nazi's were left *and* right wing, both and neither.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

Nazism (Nationalsozialismus, National Socialism; alternatively spelled Naziism<1>) was the ideology and practice of the Nazi Party and of Nazi Germany.<2><3><4><5><6><7><8><9> It was a unique variety of fascism that involved biological racism and antisemitism.<10> Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- and left-wing ideologies; in practice, Nazism was a far right form of politics.<11>
The Nazis believed in the supremacy of an Aryan master race and claimed that Germans represent the most pure Aryan nation.<12> They argued that Germany's survival as a modern great nation required it to create a New Order — an empire in Europe that would give the German nation the necessary land mass, resources, and expansion of population needed to be able to economically and militarily compete with other powers.<13>
The Nazis claimed that Jews were the greatest threat to the Aryan race and the German nation. They considered Jews a parasitic race that attached itself to various ideologies and movements to secure its self-preservation, such as: the Enlightenment, liberalism, democracy, parliamentary politics, capitalism, industrialisation, Marxism and trade unionism.<14>
To rescue Germany from the effects of the Great Depression, Nazism promoted an economic Third Position; a managed economy that was neither capitalist nor communist.<15><16> The Nazis accused communism and capitalism of being associated with Jewish influences and interests.<17> They declared support for a nationalist form of socialism that was to provide for the Aryan race and the German nation: economic security, social welfare programs for workers, a just wage, honour for workers' importance to the nation, and protection from capitalist exploitation.<18>

(Emphasis mine)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. They were right-wing, the Dittoheads cannot asborb that fact.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. You did read your own highlights, didn't you?
Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- and left-wing ideologies; in practice, Nazism was a far right form of politics.

That sentence clearly delineates between how they 'presented' themselves, and what they actually were. They claimed 'socialism' because socialism was both popular and relatively new in Europe at the time - less than two decades earlier the prevalent political system was monarchic. Though they 'presented' themselves as socialist they were, in reality, purely RW authoritarian - whatever socialism they incorporated applied ONLY to the party, not the society the party was supposed to rule.

Just as the RW always does, they lied to their own people about their goals and objectives, none of which included social justice, democracy, or protection from capitalist exploitation - the capitalist exploiters were running the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. thank you...
you explained it much cooler than I would have. This "Nazi equals left" shit just pushes me over the edge. I know people who survived the Nazis, and have the numbers on their arm to prove it. Want to guess which way they lean? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. I highlighted two sections. Intentionally.
They made a big deal out of workers, and the common man's rights, and protecting the little guy... their form of social justice, however, was limited to social justice for "Germans".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. It was nothing BUT right-wing. These guys are too stupid to grasp the facts.
It's also very possible they DO know the facts, but know how stupid their audiences are, and expect THEM to swallow that crap, deliberately lying to them, in order to line up ALL the villians in the world and claim they ALL are somehow related to Democrats!

It's so impossibly stupid, but I absolutely believe there are people who have bought that whopper and are too lazy to check for themselves, or too stupid to know how to discover the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. Is minimum wage left, or right?
How about nationalizing businesses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Jesus F. Christ. He apologized to the ADL, after insulting NPR.
What's that supposed to mean? "Uh, I didn't mean to offend you guys. I meant to offend these other guys, over there."

I'm still waiting for Rahm to apologize to liberals for the "f-ing retards" remark. He only apologized to the collateral offendees, never to his direct targets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blacksheep214 Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Just once,
when some asshat blows out some insane horseshit like this, just once, could someone ask him,

What is your definition of a Nazi?

So many words which offend yet ask back what they mean and the loudmouths shut up because they really don't think beyond short phrases. They go blank and Rachel proved it last month at a protest.

Ailes is no different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Background: ABC and the rise of Rush Limbaugh
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-libmedia.htm

The following brief history of ABC offers a perfect snapshot of everything that has gone wrong with the media. This remarkable story includes ABC's takeover by a conservative parent corporation, the demise of the Fairness Doctrine, the rightward shift of the evening news, the rise of conservative talk radio, and the cozy relationship between a state and a press that are supposed to be separate.

In 1985, ABC was taken over by Capital Cities, a conservative, Roman Catholic media organization with extensive ties to the CIA.

(If you think we're making this up, you should know that the Capital Cities takeover of ABC is one of the most analyzed in history, and the subject of many books by Wall Street experts and scholars. Especially recommended is Networks of Power, by Emmy Award-winner Dennis Mazzocco.) (1)

Capital Cities was born in 1954, and rapidly prospered. Many of its founders had previously worked in the U.S. intelligence community and had a great amount of wealth, social contacts and influence in government. Yet they opted to keep the company's actions out of the public eye -- they did not flaunt their wealth with private planes and lavish offices the way so many successful companies do. Just exactly how well-connected Capital Cities was to the CIA is unknown, but it is clear that the CIA concerned itself with the company at various times. The fact that the CIA has often used private businessmen, journalists and even entire companies as fronts for covert operations is not only well-known by historians, but legendary. (Recall Howard Hughes and Trans-World Airlines...)

One of Capital City's early founders was William Casey, who would later become Ronald Reagan's Director of the CIA. At the time of Casey's nomination, the press expressed surprise that Reagan would hire a businessman whose last-known intelligence experience was limited to OSS operations in World War II. The fact is, however, that Casey had never left intelligence. Throughout the Cold War he kept a foot in both worlds, in private business as well as the CIA. A history of Casey's business dealings reveals that he was an aggressive player who saw nothing wrong with bending the law to further his own conservative agenda. When he became implicated as a central figure in the Iran-Contra scandal, many Washington insiders considered it a predictable continuation of a very shady career.

Another Capital Cities founder, Lowell Thomas, was a close friend and business contact with Allen Dulles, Eisenhower's CIA Director, and John Dulles, the Secretary of State. Thomas always denied being a spy, but he was frequently seen at events involving intelligence operations. Another founder was Thomas Dewey, whom the CIA had given millions to create other front companies for covert operations.

<snip>

Rush Limbaugh explains his success as the result of his individualism, of his refusal to do it someone's else's way. But the fact is that his success has been orchestrated, financed and promoted by Capital Cities/ABC. He also seems extraordinarily well-connected to the Republican leadership in Washington, carrying out their campaign strategies so faithfully that it is difficult to distinguish his promotions from their campaign commercials. For example, when Rush's television show debuted nationally two months before the 92 election, his producer was Roger Ailes, who as Bush's media advisor throughout the campaign. Many of the themes that Ailes had inspired earlier in the campaign showed up in identical form on Rush's show, which resembled a program-length commercial for the Bush campaign. When asked to give equal time to his opponents, Rush responded "I am equal time!"

In 1994, not only the Rush Limbaugh Show, but hundreds of other conservative talk shows dutifully raised the issues that Newt Gingrich's Contract Information Center faxed to them each morning about the Contract With America. Many went so far as to read them verbatim over the air. And when the Republicans captured Congress in 1994, they held a ceremony in honor of Limbaugh, naming him "an honorary member of Congress" and "the Majority Maker." That night, the conservative propaganda machine had reached its full potential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Had no idea Cap Cities had this history. So damned glad to learn about it. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. the death of Steve Kangas was a blow to democracy
that the huppi site is still in existence gives me some hope that all will not be lost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. There's lots of good info on that site. Thanks for posting.
...it has always been a truism that those institutions which traffic most in knowledge and information tend to be liberal -- that is why universities, science, trading centers, world-travelers and cities have always been more liberal than average, and it is why the media are more liberal as well. When people investigate the real world, the lessons learned tend to be liberal, not conservative. And that is a generalization which stands up across the whole of human history.

Another disclosure from the Lichter survey is that the media tend to be much more educated than the general public. This, of course, is not a bad thing, and conservatives could not make it one if they tried. The disparity in education reflects more on the general public, not the media. Once again, the ramifications become more embarrassing to conservatives upon considering the larger picture. Numerous studies have found that greater education, higher I.Q.'s, liberal attitudes and non-religious beliefs are all substantially correlated to each other. (2) If an editor uses education as a criterion for hiring the best talent he can find (a natural and expected practice), then it is inevitable that these other traits would come with it.


<http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-oldliberalmedia.htm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. Nazis, huh?
Let's hear what real Nazis thought of the "free press."

In the Third Reich, "contributing by word, news report, or picture to the intellectual content of
newspapers or political periodicals" is a "public profession"; the "contributors are called
editors."33 Admission to the vocation of editor is granted through membership in the National
Association of the German Press, which is a corporate body of public law; registration must be
denied "if the Minister of Popular Enlightenment and Propaganda objects." Moreover, "no one
may be an editor" unless he (a) is a German citizen; has (b) not lost his civic rights and the
qualification to hold public office; 34 (c) is of Aryan descent and not married to a person of
non-Aryan descent; (d) has reached the age of 21; (e) is competent; (f) has had professional
training; (g) possesses the qualifications required for intellectually influencing public
opinion.

Editors are under the obligation to withhold from publication everything which:

1. Confuses selfish with common interest in a manner misleading to the public;
2. Can weaken the strength of the German people nationally or internationally, the German
nation's will toward unity, German defensive capacity, German culture or German business, or
may hurt the religious feelings of others;
3. Is offensive to the honor and dignity of a German;
4. Illegally injures the honor or the wellbeing of another person, hurts his reputation, or makes
him ridiculous or contemptible;
5. Is for other reasons indecent.85

We believe that with the Editor Act we have laid the foundations for the creation of the
freest newspaper profession on earth. The contention that we have linked the journalist too
closely to the state, does therefore not correspond to the facts.37

Marx, F. M. (1935). Propaganda and dictatorship. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 179, 211-218.


Now let me introduce you to Ken Tomlinson.

From October 2003 to September 2005, Kenneth Tomlinson served as chairman of the
Corporation for Public Broadcasting (“CPB”).1 On November 3, 2005, Mr. Tomlinson resigned
from the CPB Board of Directors, one day after CPB’s inspector general released a report critical
of Mr. Tomlinson’s leadership as chairman and alleging that he violated agency procedures,
federal laws, and the Director’s Code of Ethics.2

• Mr. Tomlinson used “political tests” as a major criteria to recruit a president and
chief executive officer for CPB, in violation of statutory prohibitions against the
use of such tests;

• The inspector general’s investigation also revealed that Mr. Tomlinson had hired a
consultant service and set up secret content studies of certain programs without proper board
authorization and communication of his plans to the public broadcasting community.6 In
addition, Mr. Tomlinson hired a consultant to examine the objectivity and balance of the
program “NOW with Bill Moyers,” in order to show that the program was not balanced.7
When PBS, in response, took steps to balance its schedule by adding “Tucker Carlson:
Unfiltered,” and “The Journal Editorial Report,” Mr. Tomlinson declined to have the
consultant evaluate those programs and decided not to have the consultant produce a final
report because, according to Mr. Tomlinson, the results would have been damaging to
public broadcasting.8 The report further revealed that Mr. Tomlinson’s involvement in selecting
and intervening on behalf of The Wall Street Journal to win a CPB contract for the weekly
program, “The Journal Editorial Report,” exceeded his role as chairman.9 As part of those efforts,
Mr. Tomlinson told senior staff not to interfere with his deal to bring the show to PBS.10 Finally,
in emails to CPB staff, Mr. Tomlinson told them to threaten to withhold funds from PBS if PBS
did not balance its programming.11

The report also examined Mr. Tomlinson’s involvement in the recruitment process for a
new CPB president.12 The inspector general concluded that Mr. Tomlinson was strongly
motivated by political ideology when filling the position.13

1 Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Office of the Inspector General, Review of
Alleged Actions Violating The Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, as Amended, Report No.
EPB503-602, p. 2 (Nov.15, 2005) . (Exhibit 1)
2 Id. at I-ii; Paul Farhi, Kenneth Tomlinson Quits Public Broadcasting Board, The
Washington Post, November 4, 2005. (Exhibit 2)
6 CPB IG Report, p. 7.
7 Id., p. 8.
8 Id.
9 CPB IG Report, pp. 11-12.
10 Id., p. 12.
11 Id.
12 Id., p. 13.
13 CPB IG Report, p. 19.


Tomlinson Cited For Abuses at Broadcast Board
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/29/AR2006082901492_pf.html

The report, released yesterday, marks the second time in less than a year that an internal
investigation has found evidence of rules violations by Kenneth Y. Tomlinson, chairman of the
Broadcasting Board of Governors. In November, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting
inspector general found that Tomlinson had made improper hires, had tried to tamper with PBS's
TV programming and appeared to show political favoritism in selecting CPB's president while he
was chairman, Tomlinson resigned his CPB post that same month.

~snip~

The investigation also found that Tomlinson -- a former Reader's Digest editor and
longtime Republican ally of White House political adviser Karl Rove -- helped hire a friend
as a BBG contractor without the knowledge of other board or staff members. The friend -- whose
name was withheld from a public summary of the investigation but whom Tomlinson identified
as retired VOA employee Les Daniels -- received nearly $245,000 for unspecified services over a
two-year period. Tomlinson signed the invoices for these payments even though there was no
documentation that the work had been completed, investigators said.

~snip~

The State Department said it turned its report over to the Department of Justice, which has
declined to bring criminal charges against Tomlinson. The allegation involving the contractor,
however, is pending in DOJ's civil division.

~snip~

A White House spokeswoman, Emily Lawrimore, said Bush continues to support
Tomlinson's pending renomination as BBG chairman. She had no further comment.


Broadcast Chief Misused Office, Inquiry Reports
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/30/washington/30broadcast.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print

Mr. Tomlinson’s position at the broadcasting board makes him one of the administration’s
top officials overseeing public diplomacy and puts him in charge of the Voice of America
and Radio Free Europe.

The State Department report noted his use of his office to oversee a stable of thoroughbreds but
did not mention one specific way in which his professional responsibilities and personal interests
appear to have intersected. The horses, according to track records, include Karzai, as in
Hamid Karzai, and Massoud, from the late Ahmed Shah Massoud) references to Afghan
leaders who have fought against the Taliban and the Russians, as well as Panjshair, the
valley that was the base used by forces to overthrow the Taliban.

~snip~

Investigators who seized Mr. Tomlinson’s e-mail, telephone and office records found that he had
improperly and extensively used his office at the broadcasting board for nongovernmental work,
including work for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the horse racing and breeding
ventures. The material seized included racing forms and evidence that he used the office to buy
and sell thoroughbreds.

Mr. Tomlinson owns Sandy Bayou Stables near Middleburg, Va., Records show that most of
the horses have not been in the money, although Massoud appears to have been quite
successful, earning purses of more than $140,000 over the last two years.


CPB Memos Indicate Level of Monitoring
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4724317

Current and former staffers at CPB say NOW With Bill Moyers repeatedly angered Tomlinson,
who believed Moyers was unfair to President Bush.

NOW blended aggressive, point-of-view reporting with Moyers' populist, liberal commentary.

For example, Moyers assailed Condoleezza Rice during a show in November 2004:
"So we are to have a new Secretary of State who dreadfully misjudged the terrorist threat leading
up to 9/11 — and then misled America and the world about the case for invading Iraq."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Outstanding job, OnyxCollie! Thank you and Bookmarked.


Wish yours were its own thread so I could Rec.

Tomlinson's a turd of the Goebbels Schule:

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” -- Herr Doktor Josef G, Rightwing Communicator and Role Model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. Right wing media moguling propagandists w/ corporate big bucks= Fascism
w/ a marked tendency toward scapegoating
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
28. Doesn't sound like an apology to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
31. "I'm sorry. I meant to say 'MEGA Nazis.'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
34. Scumbag! Guess you can't suspend yourself when you're the boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-10 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
36. Faux calling someone else nazis: I believe psychologists call this "projection". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC