Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brown calls on Whitman to take a position on Proposition 23

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 11:19 PM
Original message
Brown calls on Whitman to take a position on Proposition 23
Source: LA Times

Democratic gubernatorial nominee Jerry Brown on Monday called out his Republican rival Meg Whitman for failing to take a position on Proposition 23, which would suspend California’s landmark climate-change law until unemployment drops sharply.

“I’m for renewable energy, solar, wind, efficiency and the kind of investment in the new jobs that will keep California at the forefront,” Brown said, speaking at PermaCity Solar in Los Angeles. “It is a very regressive move and plays right into the hands of out-of-state oil companies to say yes on this particular proposition. I say no on 23 and I call upon Meg Whitman, who has yet to make up her mind, to join environmentalists, labor, citizen groups in fighting this really noxious initiative.”

The November ballot measure would suspend a 2006 law that requires California to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels over a decade. If Prop. 23 is approved, the law would be suspended until unemployment dips to 5.5% or lower for one year.

* * *

Since early August, Whitman has refused to take a position on the proposition, despite calling the law a “job killer” in the GOP primary. For nearly seven weeks, the candidate has said she is leaning against it but has not made up her mind.


Read more: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/09/brown-calls-on-whitman-to-take-a-position-on-proposition-23.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-10 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whitman and the word "mind" don't really go together (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Schwarzenegger was not qualified to be governor,
Edited on Thu Sep-23-10 12:13 AM by JDPriestly
but Whitman is not qualified to be dog-catcher. Why in the world she thinks she could manage our government I do not know.

Whitman hasn't even bothered to vote much. What in the world does she think she knows about government? It isn't like a business, not at all.

In business, you are selling a product to people who have the money to buy it.

In government, you are responsible for the lives of millions who have no money and who are very needy as well as people who have a lot of money but don't want to pay taxes. It is not at all like a business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think Nutmeg
has done much of anything in the public sector. Being COE of a company does not necessarily qualify you to be governor of any state, much less California.

Buy It Now Meg and her supporters are delusional if they think she can run this place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Her task wouldn't be to "run this place."
Her agenda is to gut the state and enrich the wealthy at the expense of the other 98%. In other words, her agenda is the same as the national GOP, only on the state level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-10 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. "but has not made up her mind." Sounds indecisive, not very governor like
so keep at it, meg-a-bucks. Don't take a strong stand on this.

She's kinda in a corner, she can agree with Brown and most of CA which will anger her corporate cronies, or she can come out for it which will anger everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC