Source:
Financial TimesLord Browne, the former BP chief executive, has sparked a furious row with top UK scientists by calling for a sweeping review of the country’s £4bn-a-year science budget to emphasise projects with the potential to bring short-term industrial benefits.
In his capacity as the president of the Royal Academy of Engineering, the UK’s premier body for engineers, Lord Browne has told senior officials at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) that they should “rebalance” government spending on science as a way to emphasise engineering and high-value manufacturing.
As a corollary to this, some areas of basic science – for instance particle physics, space telescopes and Antarctic science – could lose out.
Read more:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a588ac9a-9a7d-11df-87fd-00144feab49a.html?ftcamp=rss
This Lord Browne was the guy at BP who was in charge of cutting costs at BP to maximize profits. It was he not Hayward who put in place the policy of cutting spending for safety and maintenance at BP.
Now he is put in charge of UK's national budget and wants the UK national science budget spent for BigOil's/BigBusiness benefit instead of being spent for public interest.
Well what else did they expect when choosing the guy?