Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lingle vetoes civil union bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 08:09 PM
Original message
Lingle vetoes civil union bill
Source: Star Advertiser

Religious conservatives celebrated the governor's decision, while disappointed gay rights activists will likely push for the bill again next year. Activists may also file a lawsuit against the state alleging that it has failed to provide gay and lesbian couples with a broad range of legal rights short of marriage.

Dozens of advocates and opponents gathered outside the state Capitol today for one final burst of lobbying. Supporters, many wearing rainbow-colored lei, boomed popular music over a sound system and waved flags symbolizing equality. Opponents, many dressed in white T-shirts, formed prayer circles and sang hymns.

The bill would have given same-sex and heterosexual couples the ability to enter into civil unions and receive the same rights, benefits and responsibilities as marriage under state law. Same-sex marriages, civil unions or domestic partnerships performed in other states would have been recognized as civil unions in Hawaii.

While religious conservatives and other opponents have equated civil unions to marriage, there are differences. Civil unions in Hawaii would not have been recognized under federal law or by other states or countries that do not have civil-unions laws. Civil unions would also not have had the same religious, cultural and social significance as marriage.

Read more: http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/97904024.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unsurprising.
This does harm any chance she may have had to become a federal official however. Better to clear out the anti-gay wing of the Democrats and get full marriage anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Lingle's a Republican. This is not the fault of the Dems. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Many legislative Democrats are anti-gay.
Democrats have the numbers - by far - to override this, but for the right-wing anti-gay forces in their own ranks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. like our current president?
maybe he would have tossed us the civil union bone but he certainly is anti-marriage

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I don't think he would veto marriage rights.
Obama is anti-marriage rights, clearly, for opportunistic reasons - and I'm fine with that. But at least he stands behind "separate but equal." Those Hawaii Democrats who opposed this bill don't even support that - they stand for open inequality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oy - it never stops. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Edited on Tue Jul-06-10 08:20 PM by Newsjock
OK, because I'm really stupid and dense. My apologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. She's a Republican.
Edited on Tue Jul-06-10 08:20 PM by Pirate Smile
A Republican Governor veto's a Bill and you blame the Democrats. :wtf: Just fucking typical for about a third of DU right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetloukillbot Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Lingle is a Republican. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. No, you're not stupid - most would assume a Hawaii governor is a Dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. just another example of people not reading before commenting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I know you deleted your message because you didn't realize she was a Republican but I wanted you to
Edited on Tue Jul-06-10 09:04 PM by Pirate Smile
know (because you are so down on Democrats) that in Iowa, where Gay marriage is now legal, Democrats in the legislature have prevented all bills to restrict, overturn, or put up for a referendum, gay marriage.

Iowa Dems may lose the Governorship and the legislature after the November election and I can promise you that Republicans will treat gay marriage very different from the Dems who currently control things.

People are getting ready to shoot themselves in the f#$king foot - more like in the head - by acting like it doesn't matter which party controls Congress or their Governorships or their state legislatures. The idea that both parties are the same is simply idiotic and so extremely counter-productive that I just can't believe people have reverted back to that after 18 months of a Dem POTUS and Congress after 8 years of a Republican Presidency with 6 of those including a Republican-controlled Congress.

edit to clarify - All Republicans running for Governor supported getting a Constitutional Amendment to Ban Gay Marriage put on the ballot. Dems have prevented this from happening and they could do so because we control everything but that will probably end after November's election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
31. LIghten up on yourself. You were mistaken about one fact. Big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. I know nothing about Hawaii politics -- are there votes to override?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. No:
The civil unions bill passed by a vote of 18-7 in the Senate and 31-20 in the House, three votes shy of the two-thirds needed to override.

more: http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/20100703_veto_override_session_dead.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Says here she's Republican
Today is the deadline for the Republican governor, who leaves office in December, to veto House Bill 444, sign it into law or allow the measure to become law without her signature. The bill has been on Lingle's desk since shortly after lawmakers passed it in late April....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Economy in the toilet and Hawaii wants to drive away tourists? Dipshits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. Best twitter quoat on this...
@speechadvice - Lingle: "This decision should be made behind the CURTAIN of the voting booth" | I grew up in MS, they called that a SHEET
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. But, but, but it was time for a change!
:sarcasm:

That's why so many otherwise right-thinking people voted the prune-faced twit into office in the first place -- because the Dems had been in power for so long. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-06-10 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Those damned Dirty Democrats.... (See Senator Inouye)
Yes, I said it.. Military Industrial Complex Vunderkind that is third in line to become president.

In Hawaii, the corruption is the norm, since it sucks on the teat of the Military Industrial Complex so vigorously. The state of Hawaii is the primary testing grounds for GMO, simply because of it's stature as the most Isolated Archipelago on Earth. If horrific GMO hybrids were to escape here, it wouldn't infect the mainland crops. It's that simple.

It is estimated that if the shipments of food from the mainland were to stop, the state would start to suffer from malnutrition in 7 days. The reason? Becasue Hawaii is focused on cash crops like Coffee and Mac Nuts, and Papaya, while the real nutrition is short in supply...

You think that the designation by Bush of the Northwestern Hawaiian Island Chain as a National Historic Monument was for warm fuzzies? No, it was for the unfettered access of the Navy to hide submarines anywhere they wanted to, and exclude any onlookers from seeing any evidence.

I challenge all to see what it takes to get a permit to enter these "protected" waters, that used to be own by Hawaiians free and clear.

Hawaii is a massive example of Adverse Possession performed by a Country called the United States.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. Hawaii gov. vetoes same-sex civil unions bill
Source: San Francisco Chronicle

Hawaii's governor on Tuesday vetoed legislation that would have permitted same-sex civil unions, ending months of speculation on how she would weigh in on the contentious, emotional debate.

Republican Gov. Linda Lingle's action came on the final day she had to either sign or veto the bill, which the Hawaii Legislature approved in late April.

"There has not been a bill I have contemplated more or an issue I have thought more deeply about during my eight years as governor than House Bill 444 and the institution of marriage," Lingle said at a news conference. "I have been open and consistent in my opposition to same-gender marriage, and find that House Bill 444 is essentially marriage by another name."

...

She said voters should decide the fate of civil unions, not politicians.

"The subject of this legislation has touched the hearts and minds of our citizens as no other social issue of our day," Lingle said. "It would be a mistake to allow a decision of this magnitude to be made by one individual or a small group of elected officials."

...

The measure gave the Legislature the power to reserve marriage to opposite-sex couples. Lawmakers responded by enacting a law banning gay marriage in Hawaii but left the door open for civil unions.

...

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/07/06/national/a152133D54.DTL&tsp=1



Maybe Governor Lingle's civil rights and freedom's should be put up to popular vote.

If I could vote to take away hers alone, I would do so since she doesn't seem to appreciate that civil rights are granted by the constitution.

:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. And people just say we could change the name and everything would be peachy.
It's not the word "marriage" that is the issue, sadly. Disgusting decisions like this one are proof of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. it's true - and this proves the point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. no doubt argued by people who claim to be victimized and without their religious civil rights
do they want them put to a vote as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. I've seen a few people try to argue it here.
I'm not sure if it was on religious grounds or not. I think some would like to think there is a safe pragmatic compromise position that would be more "acceptable" than the "extreme" of marriage. But when pressed on the question of what other civil rights issues we should be or should have been "safe" on, they scurry from the issue. It's sad that something like this has to happen to show that this "safe" position is extremely vulnerable as well. When you start from a higher point of negotiation, then the outcome will probably be higher then starting lower and wishing for the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. I was appalled when this person was "elected" gov of Hawai'i
a republican governor of Hawai'i...it's a sacrilege...

And this "decision" a mealy-mouthed, religionist, cop-out by a coward!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwentyFive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Republicans have a reputation to keep up...as haters and bigots.
A vote for a republican...is a vote for hate. This has been proven so many times, that Republican=Hate has become almost cliche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dickthegrouch Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. My rage knows no limits when I hear this kind of BS
Edited on Wed Jul-07-10 01:05 AM by dickthegrouch
Another perfectly good State crossed off my vacation list.

I call on equality minded people to boycott Hawaii.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indianademocrat91 Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. Separation of Church and State!!!!
Once again Repugs piss on the Constitution on religious grounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #20
30. I did my best to warn.....to no avail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
32. In Massachusetts, the GLBT community and its supporters campagined AGAINST civil union legislation.
To review, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that refusing legal recognition of same gender relationships violated the state Constitution, a decision that could not be appealed to the SCOTUS. HOWEVER, the SJC gave the state legislature six months to act on the decision.

Although civil union legislation, then already law in Vermont, initially seemed destined to pass, both neo-theos and GLBT advocates opposed civil union legislation, a calculated risk on the part of GLBT advocates.

The Legislature did nothing about the SJC decision for two sessions. Under Mass. law, that meant not only that the SJC decision would stand because the six months stated in the decision itself had expired, but also that the Legislature could not introduce an amendment to the State Constitution to overrule the SJC decision.

Bottom line: Correct result by default. However, Constitutional rights should not be decided by legislators or by voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Hawai'i had a similar court decision years ago
but just like in CA, the same unholy alliance of the Catholic and Mormon churches rammed through a Prop H8-style constitutional amendment. So actual marriage equality isn't on the table there, and won't be for years to come.

Did I mention that my favorite human being desiresd to be married on Maui, and that the current prospect is female?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-07-10 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
33. VIDEO:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC