Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP Joined In Investigation Of Itself, Contractor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 09:11 AM
Original message
BP Joined In Investigation Of Itself, Contractor
Source: Anchorage Daily News

BP Joined In Investigation Of Itself, Contractor
BLOWOUT PREVENTERS: Rig workers had reported cheating.

Anchorage Daily News
By RICHARD MAUER
Published: June 27th, 2010 10:27 PM


When two state agencies received complaints in 2005 that a BP drilling contractor routinely cheated on tests of blowout preventers and BP knew it, the agencies let the very companies accused of wrongdoing join the investigation. Records show that attorneys and officials of BP and its contractor, Nabors Alaska, sat in with, or even in place of, state investigators when they interviewed witnesses, including Nabors rig workers and the BP company men who oversaw their work.

At times, company representatives led the questioning. In at least three instances, after witnesses confirmed allegations, company lawyers took them aside for private conversations away from state investigators. One Nabors employee, immediately after emerging from his private meeting with the Nabors attorney, recanted his statement, state records show.

Despite assertions by at least seven Nabors employees that they witnessed cheating in the recent past leading up to the investigation, the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission ultimately ruled there was no widespread pattern of wrongdoing and declined to levy penalties. But how independent was the investigation leading up to that conclusion? In reports and e-mails written at the time, BP representatives referred to the inquiry as a "joint investigation" by the "team" of BP, Nabors, the commission and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation.

In recent interviews, Commissioner John Norman and investigator Jim Regg of the state conservation commission said BP was wrong, and that the agency never agreed to characterize it as a joint investigation. But Norman and Regg could point to no document in the five volumes of their investigative file where a state official objected to BP's use of the term.


Read more: http://www.adn.com/2010/06/26/1342800/bp-helped-state-investigate-itself.html



- Cheating on blowout preventer tests? Leading in the subsequent state investigation and in the questioning of witnesses who complained about this cheating? And then taking those witnesses aside later to "talk to them" only to have them recant their testimony? Back in 2005, you say???

What could go wrong? I mean it's not as if one of these blowout preventers ever failed, right? Right???

==============================================================================
DeSwiss


http://www.atheisttoolbox.com/">The Atheist Toolbox





"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me eight times, I must be a f**king
idiot." ~ Jon Stewart, on the last eight presidents vowing to end America's addiction to foreign oil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, that is how the oil business works. Intimidation, fear, injury.
The old "joke" is that if you fall off the rig, you're fired before you hit the ground, so no claim.

It's not a joke, just the way these bastards do business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chrstianmaldor Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Lol
That's all I have to say: LOL. The fox guarding the henhouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Reminds me of how AT Massey works around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. In the same way three universities are supposed to investigate Deepwater Horizon

of course BP is funding that investigation to the tune of $50 mil.

What do you suppose the odds are that they will find BP did nothing criminally wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC