Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Teacher Fired for Becoming Pregnant Out of Wedlock

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:15 AM
Original message
Teacher Fired for Becoming Pregnant Out of Wedlock
Edited on Fri Jun-11-10 10:16 AM by kpete
Source: ABC

Teacher Fired for Becoming Pregnant Out of Wedlock
Woman Conceived Just Days Before Wedding, but School Fired Her for 'Fornication'

By RUSSELL GOLDMAN
June 11, 2010

When Jarretta Hamilton, a fourth grade teacher at a Florida Christian school, told administrators she was pregnant, she expected them to ask when she was due.
She did not, however, think her answer would get her fired.

In April 2009, Hamilton told her boss at Southland Christian School in St. Cloud, Fla., that she was pregnant and planned to take a six-week leave in October. When asked when she conceived, Hamilton answered honestly: She became pregnant just three weeks prior to her Feb. 20 wedding.

That was enough to get her fired under the school's strict morality rules, which prohibit teachers from "fornication," engaging in sex before marriage.

"Jaretta was asked not to return because of a moral issue that was disregarded, namely fornication, sex outside marriage," administrator Julie Ennis wrote in a letter to Hamilton's lawyer.

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/teacher-fired-pregnant-wedlock/story?id=10878802
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, it's par for the course. I wouldn't work for such a place.
What they hell can you expect from a bunch of perverts who are obsessed with sex? These rw fundies spend way too much time thinking about inside their underwear. Seriously, they need to pull their heads out and get some fresh air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. Not all Christians are RW Fundies. Jesus was a flaming liberal if ever there was one.
But if you work for a company or church that has a moral code or code of conduct that you cannot live up to. Then it is best to seek employment else where.


I also need to do some etymological research to see if the term "flaming liberal" is a reference to when roman emperors used to use Christians as lawn torches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #22
46. Not liberal. Radical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #46
56. Either extreme can produce Radicals. So yes he was a liberal radical for his time.
But tame by todays standard of radicals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
59. Of course, not all Christians are rw fundy-fruitcakes.
That goes without saying, as we have some very liberal members of DU who are also Christians.


It does seem, however, that this lady worked for a fundy school, so their over-reaction to her honesty is par for the course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. The fundies you are referring to spend way too much time thinking about
inside other people's underwear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
45. Too many fundie Christians, not enough lions. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ahhh fundies
She's probably better off not being exposed to the virulent assholes prevalent among them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daggahead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Before I read the whole story ...
The first thought in my head was, "This has to be in Florida."

And ... so it is.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Florida, Texas, Utah, South Carolina
They're all states with a critical mass of fundy nutcases.

I have a strong feeling she was really fired for being in an inter racial marriage. I'm sure the bluenoses who fired her all jumped the gun, themselves.

I hope she's able to escape the fundy mindset now that she knows where they're really at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. We have some pretty scary places here in Califrornia.
There are some places Mr. kt and I avoid like the plague. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. My dad decided to take the scenic route from the Orlando airport
toward the east coast of Florida. There was one town he drove through that he admonished us not to make eye contact, that the whole town had been taken over by religious nutcases and was a dangerous place.

There are religious nutbars everywhere, of course, but a whole town on a state road where they were making it dangerous for outsiders?

Only in Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaded_old_cynic Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #23
35. Really?
Do you remember what town it is? I live in South Florida on the east coast and I would appreciate knowing what towns to avoid patronizing whenever I am traveling through the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #35
47. It's on one of those state roads that meander all over the place
around Orlando. This was >20 years ago so I don't remember the name of the town.

Stick to I-95 and the Beeline and you'll miss it.

My dad was a tough old WWII vet and there wasn't much that spooked him. Those screwballs did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. My first thought was
that it's mostly because of the interracial marriage. They COULD have found it in their hearts to forgive her, but........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Okay, boys and girls, take another look at the picture.
Then ask yourselves why the school was so interested in her due date in the first place. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. That did cross my mind.
And the thought stayed there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why did she answer when she was conceived?
There is no way they could have compelled that answer out of her anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. The power of Christ compelled her?
Edited on Fri Jun-11-10 10:37 AM by Kerrytravelers
:rofl: I know, I know... :spank: :rofl:

She probably thought that lying about her baby and her life was worse in their eyes.

However, perhaps it is better she is away from them. Who the hell would want to work with people who always looked down their noses at you and whispered behind your back about your child? Not me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
31. Maybe she is just an honest, truthful person and didn't realize that her
admission would be used against her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
37. It's a tacky question for them to even ask. I suspect she answered because shes nice so overlooked
how tacky the question was, and she's honest so didn't bat an eye about telling the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. Here is my favorite part of the story:
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/teacher-fired-pregnant-wedlock/story?id=10878802&page=2

No court date has been set, but the administration said it's not courtroom "testimony" they are concerned about.

"We request," the school closed its letter, "that Jarretta withdraw her complaint and consider the testimony of the Lord."




The testimony of the Lord? Hey! Is Jesus going to show up in court and give testimony?!?


:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daggahead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Your honor, I'd like to call my next witness ...
Edited on Fri Jun-11-10 10:33 AM by daggahead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. bwaaahhhhh... *snort* ... love it.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daggahead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Maybe this is the school's lawyer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonwalk Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
38. Jesus would be on the side of the teacher. After all, his mom--
--Conceived him before she was married. I supposed, arguably, she didn't have sex out of wedlock as she was still a virgin, but all the school asked was when she conceived. If they'd asked that of Mary....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #9
67. who was conceived out of wedlock. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #67
68. Au contraire. St. Anne was married:
According to the apocryphal Gospel of James, Anne and her husband Joachim, after years of childlessness, were visited by an angel who told them that they would conceive a child. Anne promised to dedicate the child to God's service.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Anne

http://www.ewtn.com/library/mary/anne.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. I don't remember anything in the NT where Christ said anything about sex or no sex.
None of his quotes come to mind. I'm pretty sure there aren't any. It was all on how you treat others and these people are failing that. A person above said "why don't they forgive her". The answer - because they aren't really Christians. They are really fundy. These people would kill Christ in a heart beat if he actually did show up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. LOL.. Q: State your name and place of residence. A: Jesus of Nazareth
Q: Mr. Jesus, what is your occupation?

A I am the son of God.

Q. That is a very lofty title. I take it you are an expert witness on the topic of sin.

A: Yes

Q: Fine, sir. Now please state your relationship to the school and explain why you have been called upon to testify today.

A: The school administrators believe I will back up their claim that Mrs. Jarretta deserved to be fired for her act of fornication.

Q: And is that your belief, sir?

A: (Pauses) Actually, no. I include many so-called "sinners" among my friends, and I believe in forgiveness and tolerance. That is what being a Christian is all about. "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone," is my motto.

Q: No more questions for this witness. You are dismissed, sir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #24
33. Good post.
What I don't understand is why the fundies latched on to Christ who said, opposite, everything they believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
52. As I recall, the Lord's testimony on the subject was "Let he who is without sin cast the first
stone." At which point, all those with stones in their hands thought better of casting them.

Hey, it's your private school. You can have any rules you want. But don't lie and claim they're Jesus's rules. Some of us have actually read the Bible and may call you on your lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
12. I wonder what would happen if those idiots were asked the following:
Should Ronnie Raygun have been impeached and convinced because he knocked up Nancy before they made it legal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. D'oh! Their hero!
Well, see, that was different. Because that was Reagan and that was just a mistake, but he got married, so it's ok now. But this teacher. She is a whore who laid down with a man. We can't have that around *the children*.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. That baby is adorable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
61. I agree. That is one cute kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
14. I don't know why I'm getting so bent out of shape on this one.
Skinner asked us this on our Moderator Application. :shrug:







:rofl: No, he did not. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
19. They are well within their rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. They were not within their rights to violate her privacy
by disclosing why she was fired to students and parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. How would that violate her privacy? She volunteered the information.
Since she made no attempt to keep the information secreted. She has no reasonable right to an expectation of privacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #32
40. She did not divulge it to the students and parents
the school had absolutely no business disclosing the information to them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #40
48. You can't unring the bell. Once the cat is out of the bag it won't go back in quietly. If at all.
But lets just say this woman had violated other moral codes the school might have. Lets say she molested some students. Does she still have a right to privacy? Should the school not tell parent about that? The woman may not have violated US law with the pregnancy. But she violated Christian law. So I think the parents have a right to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #48
57. Child molestation is a violation of civil law.
Is pre-marital sex a violation of her contract? Was it so stated in the contract? Are violations of any of the Ten Commandments cause for termination? Have any other teachers or administrators been fired for such violations?

Didn't Jesus say something about casting stones? As memory serves He was kinda again' it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LarryNM Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #27
41. This continues a disturbing trend
where workers have fewer and fewer rights. Financial background checks, urine tests, personal matters, in jobs where it has no direct bearing and the higher ups and owners are exempt. This added with telling people if they don't like a job they can just get one elsewhere adds to an environment where there are fewer and fewer "elsewheres". Humans are not property and have rights. If an employer will not abide by these then we need laws that will make civil and criminal action necessary. Otherwise, it will only get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #41
49. I understand that. But there is a huge difference.
The US Constitution does not exempt private corporation's from Law. Churches are exempt from US law when functioning as churches. Ironically enough all those people that enacted laws mandating urine testing cannot be legally required to submit to urine testing. Where the private and public sectors are concerned I agree with you whole heartedly. But not where the church is concerned. That's a whole different ball of wax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
55. There are, of course, limitations on what they can do.
Firing her for being black, for instance.

I assume the right to procreate independent of wedlock isn't a recognized protected class; perhaps it should be? I'm not sure where I stand on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
60. As a private school, they are well within their rights to fire her.
She signed on, she can't be surprised.

I'm wondering about telling the students and parents. Granted, anyone would likely guess the reason (baby 9 months after getting married) but I'm not sure legally they may disclose private personnel information.

I would be curious if someone who actually practices law, in particular employer/employee rights law could comment on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
20. the advancement of women's rights..
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonwalk Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. Ah, no, it's only backwards for women if...
it can be proved that the same would not apply to a male teacher. That is, if a recently married male teacher had told them his wife was preggers, would they have asked him the same question and fired him if he'd answered the same way?

However, it's a private school and a religious issue--alas for us, such places are allowed to be both racist and sexist. Or maybe they just didn't want to pay maternity leave? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Ahem.. Have you EVER heard of a case involving a male
where they were dismissed for fathering a child out of wedlock (in the absence of other factors?)

Crickets???? Chirp Chirp


Then, I think my point is made...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
25. If she had had an abortion instead of her fiancee's baby
and didn't tell them about it, she'd still have her job.

As it is, though, she should win enough cash to put them out of business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
26. Normally I would say that she doesn't have a cause, but the school violated her privacy
so all bets are off.

According to the complaint, Hamilton is suing under federal gender discrimination laws, a state marriage discrimination law and for violations of her privacy.

"The school told the students and their parents why Hamilton had been fired. Disclosing that kind of personal information was a violation of her privacy," Gay said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertDiamond Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
34. Does she have to wear a big letter "A" on her chest???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #34
62. No
"A" is for Adultery, I think it would be the letter "F" for Fornication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
36. In the mean time, the Administrator was searching Rentboy.com.
Time for summer vacation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
39. Anyone think that I, a white male teacher, could be fired for the same??
I don't think so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
42. Meanwhile;
The students in xtian schools are getting STDs in increasing numbers. There are also increasing numbers of cases of AIDS there. Just because they can't perform coitus doesn't mean that they are not having sex. They are and a lot of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
43. actually, she was probably fired for having a mixed marriage-to-be
these fundies are ruthless racists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
44. Welcome to the 1950's!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
50. "When did you concieve?"
Answer: I'm sorry, such a question is not really your business.

This woman is shocked that she was treated this way? had she not paid attention to the kind of people she was hanging with?

I am sorry she lost her job, but either she wasn't paying attention to the type of folk she was working for, or she was part of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
51. I shake my head in wonder.....
not at the teacher getting fired but rather the reaction here by some of you.
Its a Christian school so its kind of a no brainer that they would probably fire her for getting pregnant while not being married, I'm not saying I agree with them mind you however I do understand why they fired her for this.
Should they have handled it better though? Ya, they should that much is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. I Wonder If They Would Have Fired Sarah Palin?
:shrug:

FSH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #54
65. I have not seen anything to prove that they wouldnt fire her if she did this same thing
so I feel safe in saying yes they would probably have done the same thing even if it was sarah palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #51
64. It is a Christian school
And yet if they stoned a child for being rebellious, it would be a felony.

It isn't about her geting fired, as much as it is about the school violating her privacy.

The parents and the students had no right to know why she was fired.

This was about the school branding her as a wanton woman, someone to be avoided by all good "Christian" people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. Ok, in that area of telling the students and parents why
she might very well have a case but as for them branding her a wanton women, technically according to their faith, she is.
Her best bet to make her case harder for them to overturn on appeal if she wins the trial would probably be (atleast imo) to limit it to that privacy violation aspect that you mentioned for telling the students why she was dismissed, the school didn't have to tell them exactly why and they could have just said they can't discuss such things and left it at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
53. Render unto the propagandists the things of the propagandists. Or to put it more clearly,
if you didn't know the Christian school was bat-shit crazy when you hired on, shame on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
58. At a NY Catholic HS several years ago
the students walked out and their parents refused to pay TUITION when the school fired two teachers for violating their morals clause. One teacher got a divroce and remarried. The other teacher had a vasectomy. I believe the latter teacher mentioned this to a coworker who apparently "ratted him out". This got a lot of local publicity and the reaction to the firings was all negative. The outcome was that the school scrapped their morals clause for teacher contracts. The teachers were reinstated, but NEITHER choose to return.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-11-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
63. Obviously, she was a poor fit with fundie christians.
A proper fundie christian would have sinned, then lied about it. Repeatedly. If the face of overwhelming evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
69. Inexcusable behavior for a business.
Believing stupid shit is not an excuse for cruelty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC