Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'If he was working for me I'd sack him' – Obama turns up heat on BP boss

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 03:37 PM
Original message
'If he was working for me I'd sack him' – Obama turns up heat on BP boss
Source: Guardian.co.uk

Barack Obama has put the survival of BP's Tony Hayward in even deeper jeopardy today, saying he would have sacked the chief executive for downplaying the oil spill catastrophe in the Gulf.

In the six weeks BP's well has been spewing oil into the Gulf of Mexico, Hayward has made a name for himself as the "Bumbler from BP" for clumsy comments, prompting the US president to say he would have sacked Hayward if he had been "working for me".

--snip--

The tough talk from Obama today appears part of a concerted administration strategy to distance itself from the oil company and shield itself from growing public anger at the ongoing catastrophe in the Gulf.

The administration's top man on the spill, coast guard admiral Thad Allen, this week shifted his daily briefings from the Gulf Coast to Washington.

He told reporters today that the administration would meet BP officials this week to demand it speed up pay-outs to small businesses who have lost out because of the spill. In addition to the mounting costs of clean-up and compensation claims, BP is also threatened with prosecution if a federal government investigation determines possible wrongdoing in BP's management of the well.

"There may be situations in which not only human error was involved but you also saw some corner cutting in terms of safety," Obama told NBC.

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/jun/08/bp-deepwater-horizon-obama



The whole article should be read- snippets can't do it justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Salazar? Allen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. The Boys From Goldman and the Boys from Chicago, Starting With Rahm?
And good ole Uncle Ben--the one you already reappointed....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The Bush/Cheney MMS enablers?
I want their heads on a silver platter along with the BP nitwits. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. What about the people who DO work for you, Mr. President?
How hard should this be to figure out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Uh, yeah, Mr Obama, there are plenty of assholes YOU can fire, if
you have a mind to. Start off with all those RW lawyers Bush put in. Send 'em their termination notices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why aren't all of BP's assets seized, foreign and domestic?
Whatever all of that is worth, it will never come close to fixing this environmental disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyounkin Donating Member (722 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bwwhahahahh
Yeah.

You have SUCH a history of holding people accountable!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Theyll sack him when this is over, with a huge retirement package
He is doing his job by being more hated than BP. BP will makeover its image without him after he has absorbed the brunt of the fallout. Thats how this works from a PR perspective. Once the disaster is out of the way, clean slate for the next guy and the company
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wow, finally
Obama breaks out the "strongly worded statement."

Take that, Hayward!!

As a very last resort perhaps he'll bite his thumb at them, which is a disgrace to them if they bear it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. So what are you waiting for, Mr. Prez?
Nationalize BP's American subsidiaries and assets!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. sounds like whack-a-mole: get everyone to pile on the CEO, fire him, and then the anger dissipates
but the problem remains.

Fire and prosecute him, but keep your eye on the corporation, regulate, tax the shit out of, and criminally prosecute, or put out of business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Permanut Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. A strongly worded letter
should do the trick, but only if a federal investigation determines that there is possible wrongdoing by BP and/or Hayward. Are you kidding me? If I blow up my house with dynamite, does it take a federal investigation to figure out if I handled it correctly? If I pee on the floor, does it take a federal investigation to determine if my aim is off? If I shoot myself in the leg, does it take a federal investigation to find out if I should have stuck a loaded gun in my pants? This is just creepy to see anyone still wondering if BP did anything wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. Therein lies the problem, from day one. He isn't working for us.
He's working for BP. Which is why the US Government needed to take charge of this catastrophe as soon as it happened. We could have hired BP (at BP's expense) to kill the well and contain the spill, instead we left it all up to them and they fucked the gulf.

BP's objective was salvaging their operation and limiting their loss, our objective was about saving the gulf. Two different objectives, two different results.

I wish somebody was working for US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. +1 "I wish somebody was working for US."
Me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. On past behaviour, you'd have re-appointed him on a higher salary.
"Tough talk from Obama" my arse.

Just who does he think he is kidding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-10 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
17. Whew, I bet he's scared now!
BP owns our government. If they cut off the military oil, we'd crap our collective pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC