Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Salazar: IG drilling findings 'deeply disturbing'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:59 AM
Original message
Salazar: IG drilling findings 'deeply disturbing'
Source: Associated Press

(AP) – 1 hour ago

WASHINGTON — A new Interior Department report faulting federal regulators for lax oversight of offshore drilling as well as ethics lapses is "deeply disturbing," Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said Tuesday.

The report, which follows up on a 2007 investigation, found that staffers at the Minerals Management Service accepted tickets to sports events, lunches and other gifts from oil and gas companies and used government computers to view pornography.

Salazar said several employees in the report have resigned, were fired, terminated or referred for prosecution. He said it showed the importance of his plan to abolish the agency and replace it with three new entities.

The violations mentioned in the report occurred between 2000 and 2008, well before last month's disastrous oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. But the report adds to the climate of frustration and criticism facing the Obama administration in the oil spill disaster.

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hSsGsiZ18JYxHwuLGeC7Tu4T2nLwD9FTSRBO1



Warm fuzzies for a few at MMS in exchange for what public good?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. So give them a bonus.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. How ironic, I find Salazar "deeply disturbing." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. He should have been fired ... with extreme prejudice.
Edited on Tue May-25-10 10:12 AM by ShortnFiery
On another thread someone told me that it was a KNOWN FACT that the MMS was corrupt since 2007. Then WHY didn't our illustrious Interior Secretary, one each, Ken Salazar, take extra care to OVERSEE these known incompetents? What passes for discipline within Salazar's MMS?

Why isn't Ken Salazar responsible for not supervising a division that he is in charge of?

I'm so disgusted that the people at the very top always seem to "slither away" or "get promoted" when they demonstrate blatant incompetence. It's the Peter Principle on steroids. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, we knew all along that every 'house' associated with the
Bush administration's reign of "terror" was nothing but a party-hearty frat house, with Bush serving as court jester.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Yuppers - these are all Republicon Homelander Cronies
Inflicted upon America by the Bush-Cheney Republicorporate cabal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Yes, but why couldn't Salazar, et. al., in the Interior Dept, MOVE these cronies to
other, less dangerous positions? They could have been "peer transfered" to another department and maintained their appointment levels.

Also, they could have had people monitor these people's actions if they were known to be suspect.

Nope, Ken Salazar does not get a "free pass" just because his department was chock full of BushCo cronies. They could have taken steps to minimize their impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. all this going on right under his nose.. he better be fired too
what was he doing, catching up on his "Lost" dvds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Well, no.
The report cited in the OP documents Bush Era abuses. As a Coloradan who knows what a political beast Salazar is, I'm not fan of his, but these reported abuses did not go on "under Salazar's nose."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. ah considering the current status of the gulf i assumed it was still happening
seems like the inspections would have gone better if they had fixed it after bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. I'm not happy about the current Administration's response to the Gulf,
but to cut them some slack, it takes a looooong time to cleanse the corruption that was embedded under 30 years of Republican and DLC rule. Salazar couldn't possibly know every bit of corruption in the Interior Department in just a year and a half. Unfortunately, it took this disaster to bring a lot of the problems in the oil industry to the forefront of public knowledge. Of course, many of us knew this right along, but you know, politicians live in another reality than the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. No, this all happened (with sex for oil contracts and all that stuff)
during Bush's time. I am not sure how many people are still in MMS from that time. Salazar can be accused of not cleaning up Bush's mess fast enough if many of the same people are still there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's all deeply disturbing. Very, very disturbing.
Nothing will change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. The interior dept and the MMS were gutted during Bush's 8 years. Salazar
needs to clean it up fast or he needs to be fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. Why didn't President Obama and Secy Salazar do this when he was appointed?
It seems as if they were aware of THE PROBLEM within the MMS but did not take the proper steps to clean up the inspection branch of this entity.

The fault lies with both Administrations and Salazar should tender his resignation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Good question. These are longtime govt. workers, couldn't they have been
moved elsewhere? Or if enough evidence was found that there were wrongdoings, fired? Earl Devaney gave his Interior Dept. Inspecter General report in 2008. Salazar had a year and a half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. Regulators Accepted Gifts From Oil Industry, Report Says
Source: Wall Street Journal

By STEPHEN POWER

WASHINGTON—Employees of a federal agency that regulates offshore drilling—including some whose duties included inspecting offshore oil rigs—accepted sporting-event tickets, lunches and other gifts from oil- and natural-gas companies and used government computers to view pornography, according to a new report by the Interior Department's inspector general.

The report—which hasn't been made public by the inspector general but was described Tuesday in an email from Interior Secretary Ken Salazar—notes "a number of violations" of federal regulations and agency ethics rules by staffers assigned to the Lake Charles, La., office of the Minerals Management Service, a unit of Interior that manages the nation's offshore oil and gas resources, Mr. Salazar said in his statement.

Mr. Salazar disclosed some of the inspector general's findings ahead of congressional hearings later this week that are to focus on his plan to restructure the agency following the April 20 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig. The accident led to the deaths of 11 workers and to the spillage of thousands of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico each day.

The New York Times also reported on findings of the inspector general's report Tuesday morning.

Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704026204575266112115488640.html?mod=e2tw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. i'm shocked !!....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Here is the NYT version:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. That's why new ethics rules were issued as soon as President Obama took power
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Excellent verbiage with EPIC FAIL follow-through by Secretary Salazar.
Regulations don't mean SQUAT unless their acted upon. It's just "pretty words." :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
38. Someone should go to jail. Either BP exec's or Salazar or both. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Yes but are they being enforced? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. i'm shocked part 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. Should BP be held accountable for the cost of clean-up? Or should tax payers? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. he should be thrown into a jail
stop fucking around and hold this freak responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
15. PLEASE WAIT A MOMENT....while i put on my look of surprise !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
17. Who would have guessed such things could happen? Golly. Gee, even.
The revolving door can be so surprising. Truly, I'm just so shocked. Shocked, I tell you - shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlesg Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
22. Salazar didn't "abolish" the agency. He merely cut the salamander in three.
It looks like much of the upper management is still the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
25. How does this add to criticism of the Obama administration?
"the report adds to the climate of frustration and criticism facing the Obama administration"

How does a report about violations that occurred between 2000 and 2008 add to criticism of the Obama administration? Is this just bad writing or is it slanted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Sloppy and slanted reporting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Because he's been in office almost 16 months? And ran on change?
Just a guess.

We insisted Bush own 911 afer less than 9 months--and Bushco did not literally issue permits to Al Qaeda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. And Obama has a time machine and can change things that happened in the past?
Is that what you're saying? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. BP was ignoring regulations and taking short-cuts on safety. The Obama admin had plenty of time to
discover this, but they either didnt look or didnt care. This happened on Pres Obama's watch. Remember when Bush tried to blame 9/11 on Clinton? But we held him accountable. This happened on Pres Obama's watch and he owns it. And he still hasnt fired "Brownie" Salazar.

I voted for change. Pres Obama and Palin agree that we should be drilling off-shore. What does that tell you? We are still drilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. Obama said off-shore drilling was safe like Bush said the levies in NO were safe. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. Salazar nor his boss has taken any action on this
It's the sin of omission, letting the foxes continue to rule the hen house. Even when they knew of the faulty or non-existent inspections, environmental waivers, etc, etc, they did nothing to stop this and even ended the moratorium on coastal drilling. Why would they do that unless they too are now part of the problem?

That's the issue here and why so many people are mad at these guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
28. salazar is a shill for the oil companies.
another piss poor pick by obama....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
29. Are these Bush people who should have been canned on 1/21/09?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. yes.. but obama invited these losers to join him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
31. I wonder how long this report was buried
before today. These reports don't happen overnight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
34. Salazar is fucking oil scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC