Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(MA Gov.) Patrick says Obama critics are 'almost at the level of sedition'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ed Barrow Donating Member (585 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:47 PM
Original message
(MA Gov.) Patrick says Obama critics are 'almost at the level of sedition'
Source: Boston Globe

Governor Deval Patrick, even as he decried partisanship in Washington, said today that Republican opposition to President Obama’s agenda has become so obstinate that it “is almost at the level of sedition.”

The Democratic governor, who is close to the president, made the comments at a forum at Suffolk Law School's Rappaport Center, where he was asked by an audience member about partisan battling in Congress.

Patrick said that even "on my worst day, when I’m most frustrated about folks who seem to rooting for failure," he doesn't face anything like the opposition faced by the president.

"It seems like child’s play compared to what is going on in Washington, where it is almost at the level of sedition, it feels to like me,” Patrick said.



Read more: http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/05/patrick_says_ob.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Except that have long ago America abandoned outlawing "seditious speech." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Patrick's speaking more about behavior
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DGG Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. True, but legal doesn't always mean good or justified
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Or it might be that some groups have been in sedition for a long time.
Edited on Mon May-24-10 11:00 PM by RandomThoughts
Going against the concepts of representative democracy and many other concepts of social justice, and they are being shown for what they have been doing in secret for many years.

Although I think for all those years many people have been standing for better ways also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertDiamond Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. RandomsThoughts, this is so OT, but I just gotta ask...
What's the significance of this photo of Burgess Meredith? Or, this guy who looks like Burgess Meredith?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw somewhere that people were pushing Patrick to run in '16.
Makes sense. Who better to follow Obama than his good friend Patrick? He's got exec expearience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. You are either with the president, country, flag, patriotism and Mom and Apple Pie
or you are with the terrorists.

We have TROOPS IN THE FIELD!!

Badmouthing of the Commander in Chief in a time of war is akin to giving direct aid and comfort to the enemy.

(Read my sig line if you don't get it)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iliyah Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yea
they want to break away and start their own republic, and honestly I would sorta feel sorry for their followers because the elite gop/tea baggers don't give a sh*t about the underneath foes, they would be on their own, ie, dumb and poor, because thats the best way to keep control of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Badmouthing of the Commander in Chief
Well, I don't think it's the criticism being commented on. It's the desire for failure....people who truly want to see things get bad just so the Prez looks bad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shining Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. Lol !
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Think this is really a telling difference between people who do not see this
spill and the potential for damage to nature -- and who knows what kind of compounding

of consequences might occur -- as something as serious as others of us see it!

It is because so many of us feel the potential is there for a 100 years of damage --

and very immense immediate damage -- that we call for the government to take on complete

control and supervision of this well.

I also find anyone -- left or right -- reducing this to a political attack or worry

about Obama's standing in polls -- absolutely vile!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Governor Is Correct, Sir
Indeed, a number of people have crossed that line....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Suji to Seoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. Michael Savage used to claim that Democrats who criticized Heir Chimpenstooge should be arrested
and tried under the "Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798." For him, the apparent concept of the 1801 sunset clause on the law means nothing.

Patrick, watch who you call seditious. It could be thrown back at you. Unless there is a conspiracy to commit overt illegal or violent acts, sedition is not usually prosecuted.

However, I do agree with the good Governor completely. 1/20/2009 was the first day of the strong attempts to de-legitimize Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. Need some specificity here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andronex Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. This is a joke...
Behind closed doors repugs and democrats get along perfectly but you got to keep the illusion going to fool the little people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffersonChick Donating Member (338 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Sounds familiar...
"Apparently our First Amendment rights are only guaranteed if we agree with the tax-and-spend policies of Deval Patrick and Barack Obama,'' Jennifer Nassour, chairwoman of the state GOP, said.

She added, "the governor should focus on the critical issues at hand, like (lowering) property taxes and controlling rampant spending, instead of defending his buddy President Obama."


Hmmm... this sounds awfully familiar... Oh right, now I remember! Back in the day of George W., when we exercised that same First Amendment right, we were called "un-American".

God, how I love the GOP double standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. "God, how I love the GOP double standards."
You seem to forget, Bush was not Black. There is always a double standard for Black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. Exactly!
Back in the day, when we said (roughly) the same thing about *, we were called un-American. We, naturally, disagreed with that characterization of it. Now, when the repukes do it, we (or some of our elected officials, anyway) call it sedition.

Yeah, the GOP is the only one with a double standard here. :sarcasm:.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Indeed
As soon as I read the word "sedition", I flinched. A term such as that one cannot be so casually tossed around. I would expect a public servant who knows our country's history to know better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Oh? They invite you to their meetings?
Well, don't just stand there, DISH! I'm sure you have lots of intimate details to relate that none of the rest of us will ever know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. Exactly, they ALL kneel at the feet of Corporations like BP..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jubal-Waters Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
18. never in my country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spicegal Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
20. The right wingers tend to act this way when they're out of power.
It's just appears to be much worse under Obama, and I suspect that's due to a combination of things-racism, media stoking controversy, a much more sophisticated and far reaching right wing media pumping out propaganda 24/7, wealthy folks contributing ever more dollars to fund GOP campaigns, just to name a few. I don't know what's to be done. If anything, Obama has been overly cautious in not appearing to step too far leftward. There's really been nothing radical or left wing about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. very good observation
I'd have to agree. Events which have fallen out in experience over the course of the last year back up this assertion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
22. The problem is
that President Obama has not given them some sex scandal or other even more stupid thing for republicans to spend 100 million dollars "investigating". The absence of a simple matter to be "morally outraged" about, causes the republicans to dream stuff up whole cloth. There is a reason matadors wave a red cape in front of the bull, it keeps their attention fixed on something less harmful. Given that your average republican representative is possessed of roughly the same number of IQ points and level of compassion, some distraction might be useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
24. Found this interesting tidbit in Wiki's article on sedition
In 1940, the Alien Registration Act, or "Smith Act", was passed, which made it a crime to advocate or to teach the desirability of overthrowing the United States Government, or to be a member of any organization which does the same. It was often used against Communist Party organizations. This Act was invoked in three major cases, one of which against the Socialist Worker's Party in Minneapolis in 1941, resulting in 23 convictions, and again in what became known as the Great Sedition Trial of 1944 in which a number of pro-Nazi figures were indicted but released when the prosecution ended in a mistrial. Also, a series of trials of 140 leaders of the Communist Party USA also relied upon the terms of the "Smith Act" - beginning in 1949 - and lasting until 1957. Although the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the convictions of 11 CPUSA leaders in 1951 in Dennis v. United States , that same Court reversed itself in 1957 in the case of Yates v. United States, by ruling that teaching an ideal, no matter how harmful it may seem, does not equal advocating or planning its implementation. Although unused since at least 1961, the "Smith Act" remains a Federal law.


Remember Bachmann encouraging her followers not to participate in the census.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
25. Snark all you want - The governor is right. This shit is extreme even for the GOP's usual
shitty politics. They are crossing the line.


mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
26. Memo to Governor Patrick:
Edited on Tue May-25-10 07:49 AM by mahatmakanejeeves
In the words of Thomas Jefferson, "lighten up, dude."

You want nasty? This is nasty:

The prairie dog sickened at the sting of the hornet or a diplomatic puppet exhibiting his deceptions



Summary:

James Akin's earliest-known signed cartoon, "The Prairie Dog" is an anti-Jefferson satire, relating to Jefferson's covert negotiations for the purchase of West Florida from Spain in 1804. Jefferson, as a scrawny dog, is stung by a hornet with Napoleon's head into coughing up "Two Millions" in gold coins, (the secret appropriation Jefferson sought from Congress for the purchase). On the right dances a man (possibly a French diplomat) with orders from French minister Talleyrand in his pocket and maps of East Florida and West Florida in his hand. He says, "A gull for the People."


Everytime I hear someone say that the demeanor of political discourse has never been uglier, I pull out this cartoon. Until the tone reaches this level, it's strictly amateur hour.

Jefferson would be making popcorn at this stage of the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
27. I think it's important to point out the ridiculousness of the uber right
However, I think it's also important to be very careful about how you go about doing it.

Using words like "sedition" surrenders the high ground.

The uber right is unreasoned, full of hysteria and down-right mean sometimes.

When we point that out, we need to stay reasoned, calm, and civil.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
28. Think about the level of BushCo criticism here
Edited on Tue May-25-10 12:23 PM by autorank
That was not matched by the Democratic Party but it was extremely intense.

The nonsense about birth certificates, religion, and "dictatorship" are pure lunacy. The repetition of these charges against Obama is destructive; but it's also isolated the extremists. They're at about 20% (the true believers).

The public doesn't buy it. But these views are the Republican platform. It will make the Democrats the only choice for many independents in 2010.

Idiocy yes, sedition no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Troop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
30. 3 years ago I would have said that this was prelude to arresting
and silencing protesters. I guess I still do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
32. It is like that because people fear change...
they would rather be continuously shit on then make any dramatic change to correct the corruption that plaques them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
33. Deval Patrick is a favorite target of the right wing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC