Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

14 `enduring bases' set in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:33 AM
Original message
14 `enduring bases' set in Iraq
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/chitribts/20040323/ts_chicagotrib/14enduringbasessetiniraq&cid=2027&ncid=1473

From the ashes of abandoned Iraqi army bases, U.S. military engineers are overseeing the building of an enhanced system of American bases designed to last for years.


Last year, as troops poured over the Kuwait border to invade Iraq (news - web sites), the U.S. military set up at least 120 forward operating bases. Then came hundreds of expeditionary and temporary bases that were to last between six months and a year for tactical operations while providing soldiers with such comforts as e-mail and Internet access.


Now U.S. engineers are focusing on constructing 14 "enduring bases," long-term encampments for the thousands of American troops expected to serve in Iraq for at least two years. The bases also would be key outposts for Bush administration policy advisers.


As the U.S. scales back its military presence in Saudi Arabia, Iraq provides an option for an administration eager to maintain a robust military presence in the Middle East and intent on a muscular approach to seeding democracy in the region. The number of U.S. military personnel in Iraq, between 105,000 and 110,000, is expected to remain unchanged through 2006, according to military planners.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eablair3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. this was always the plan
to have military bases on the ground in Iraq for the long term was always the goal. With the military might and the central location in Iraq, it allows the U.S. to control and have a huge say in the whole region.

PNAC.

This was always what was intended. The strife in Iraq only gives them a pretext to keep the troops there for the long-term and to have permanent military bases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Mechanized, oil dependant military
Our military is highly mechanized and without cheap avaialble oil for many decades to come the US would be on equal footing with the rest of the world. Take away the Jets, helecopters, ships and what have got left. Man for man with small arms.

Iraq is key to the U.S. maintaing global military domination. I loath the GOP and the industrial war machine. They are will ultimately be the end of us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coltman Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. interesting post but....
i wonder were one could find the figures on how much American oil went into the winning of WW 2.Any ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. What exactly would that demonstrate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coltman Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. It would show...
how much of our reserves went for the freedom they enjoy in Europe now.I don't know of any other country that supplied the oil to fight this first mechanized war I think we supplied it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. According to this site
six out of seven billion barrels used by the Allies came from the USA.

http://www.galtglobalreview.com/business/politics_of_oil.html

That's about 20% of current proven reserves in the USA; or 780 days US production at current rates; or 300 days US consumption.

http://production.investis.com/bp/ia/stat/#

I would point out that the US didn't enter the Second World War to defend Europe; it did it to defend itself against the Japanese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. How does supplying oil during WWII
Give the U.S. the right to invade Iraq and take their oil 60 years later?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatelseisnew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. "As the U.S. scales back its military presence in Saudi Arabia.."??????
Who is this presstitute?

W* pulled out of SA already , caving in to AlQueda Demands!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. And which company BUILDS those bases?
That's right, our friends at Kellogg, Brown and Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton, Inc.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Operation 'Enduring Hatred', commence! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magleetis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. Another brilliant idea
from our ethnocentric government. Our involvement in Iraq will fail miserably. I really used to like this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. more likely...... "enduring targets"
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 10:59 AM by leftchick
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swinney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bases in Iraqstein
This is why Wolfowitz, Bolton etc were so hot to trot to Iraq.

One reason--Protect Israel and oil was distant second.

Look at Bush foreign policy team JEWS JEWS JEWS. Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadu Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Sad but true. A fact is a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Now there....
You could have said the same thing about the peace movement in the '60s: Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, etc.

If any ethnic group dominates the * admin, it is blue blood WASPs. The handful of ex-Stalinists in PNAC don't change that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cspiguy Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Kerry is part Jewish. Better Shut The F(&* up!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why does a free I-raq need 14 "enduring" US bases???
Why does a "free" I-raq need a $3 billion dollar CIA established and operated secret police force???

Why do the Chimp and Poodle control all of I-raq's oil revenue???

Is it because I-raq is not really free???

Is it because I-raq is nothing more than a petrocolony of the US and UK???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. I always suspected they would pump Iraqi oil directly into the military
Thereby circumventing the market entirely. Of course, if the Iraqis don't go along with the plan...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Gotta refine it first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. No problemo -- get Halliburton to build refineries on the new bases
The only problem is defending the pipelines...unless the bases are built right on the oil fields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. Iraq liberated...
.. from its oil (Operation Iraq-ee Liberation) OIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC