Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

APNewsBreak: Bubble of Methane Triggered Rig Blast

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Elmore Furth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:48 AM
Original message
APNewsBreak: Bubble of Methane Triggered Rig Blast
Source: Associated Press

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: May 8, 2010
Sign in to Recommend
Twitter
Sign In to E-Mail

Print

Single Page

Filed at 3:18 a.m. ET

ON THE GULF OF MEXICO (AP) -- The deadly blowout of an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico was triggered by a bubble of methane gas that escaped from the well and shot up the drill column, expanding quickly as it burst through several seals and barriers before exploding, according to interviews with rig workers conducted during BP's internal investigation.

While the cause of the explosion is still under investigation, the sequence of events described in the interviews provides the most detailed account of the April 20 blast that killed 11 workers and touched off the underwater gusher that has poured more than 3 million gallons of crude into the Gulf.

Portions of the interviews, two written and one taped, were described in detail to an Associated Press reporter by Robert Bea, a University of California Berkeley engineering professor who serves on a National Academy of Engineering panel on oil pipeline safety and worked for BP PLC as a risk assessment consultant during the 1990s. He received them from industry friends seeking his expert opinion.

Based on the interviews, Bea believes that the workers set and then tested a cement seal at the bottom of the well. Then they reduced the pressure in the drill column and attempted to set a second seal below the sea floor. A chemical reaction caused by the setting cement created heat and a gas bubble which destroyed the seal.



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/05/08/us/AP-US-Gulf-Oil-Spill.html?ref=news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, the irony.
A group of BP executives were on board the Deepwater Horizon rig celebrating the project's safety record, according to the transcripts. Meanwhile, far below, the rig was being converted from an exploration well to a production well.

The BP executives were injured but survived, according to one account. Nine rig crew on the rig floor and two engineers died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elmore Furth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Federal regulators warned oil rig operators in 2000 about blowout preventers...
but the Interior Department never took steps to address the issue definitively but just took industry assurances that it was on top of the problem. More Bush idiocy coming back to bite us.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/08/us/08agency.html?ref=science
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Some yes, some no.
The 2004 and 2007, surely.

But unless there was a 1999 presidential election in the US that I wasn't aware of, the 2000 warnings fell on non-Bushy ears.

February 2000 to January 2001. Eleven months isn't a *long* time, but it's often enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NecklyTyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. We hear the estimates of 60000 barrels of oil a day spewing out of the sea floor

    But how much Methane is bubbling out at the same time.

    Methane is 80 times stronger as a greenhouse gas than CO2

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. We are so fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Halliburton SHOULD have learned a lesson from the Timor Sea disaster...
And US regulators should have learned also! (Oh, wait, there aren't any real oil drilling regulators -only cheerleaders and tax collectors!)

link:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montara_oil_spill>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. The way I read this (was just about to post it) is tht Halliburton is off the hook
I think. I have to admit that I don't know enough about this to really understand what this article says-it is written in a very confusing way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Methane ice is very unstable. When the concrete sets, it
heats up. If there is methane ice nearby It will expand.

http://marine.usgs.gov/fact-sheets/gas-hydrates/title.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Okay - I was wrong
Edited on Sat May-08-10 06:11 PM by underpants
According to the account he has pieced together, a group of BP executives were on board the Deepwater Horizon rig celebrating the project's safety record while, far below, the exploration well was being converted for oil production.

The workers set and then tested a cement seal at the bottom of the well, he believes, but - as they reduced the pressure in the drill column and attempted to set a second seal below the sea floor - a chemical reaction caused by the setting cement created heat.

That heat converted a pocket of methane crystals into a bubble of compressed gas which grew as it rose up the drill column.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/7696596/BP-oil-disaster-how-a-deadly-methane-bubble-triggered-explosion.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. That methane could be really dangerous. It could also
power the US for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Halliburton was involved in the concrete work as a contractor in both the Montara and Gulf spills
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Okay- I was wrong
According to the account he has pieced together, a group of BP executives were on board the Deepwater Horizon rig celebrating the project's safety record while, far below, the exploration well was being converted for oil production.

The workers set and then tested a cement seal at the bottom of the well, he believes, but - as they reduced the pressure in the drill column and attempted to set a second seal below the sea floor - a chemical reaction caused by the setting cement created heat.

That heat converted a pocket of methane crystals into a bubble of compressed gas which grew as it rose up the drill column.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/7696596/BP-oil-disaster-how-a-deadly-methane-bubble-triggered-explosion.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeckind Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. Sorry, gotta problem with this
Edited on Sat May-08-10 09:41 AM by seabeckind
Gotta call bullshit.

Report comes out a week after the "accident" and blames a mean ole methane cloud. This report written by an independent guy who just happened to work for BP.

(No one could have predicted comes to mind)

My question is: And this cloud formed why? Seems like maybe the methane exploding might have been unavoidable but the creation of the cloud ahead of time ... not so much.

Sorry guys, next ...

<edit> fix fat finger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Some of the earliest reports spoke of gas detectors sounding.
The gas cloud would have formed very quickly. If it's under enough pressure to force its way up from 5k ft down, it's unlikely we're talking about just a cubic meters per minute. IIRC, this was a minute or two before the oil came through.

The gas cloud would then have formed by default if the winds weren't strong enough to disperse it, esp. in nearby partly enclosed areas.

Moreover, CH4 is the most plausible and reasonable excuse for a fire that size, esp. one that's explosive. You usually have to work at least a little to get crude oil to ignite. A spark won't do it. If you get it going, it's not going to explode--it's not volatile enough, even if it's light and has a fair proportion of volatile fractions. A simple oil gusher without natural gas can't account for the initial results in a fairly straightforward way.

However methane's often associated with oil wells, for obvious reasons and has all the right properties to account for the first reports in a fairly brainless way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. There was a report on TV last night that South American countries
w/ offshore drilling require remote control shut-offs for just this type of situation.

I believe industry eliminated this kind of requirement in the US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. Exploding methane....where has that been a problem before? In WV perhaps? Hmmmmm....
Could the lesson be any clearer?

Fossil fuels are for fossils. Burning them is old, tired and obsolete. We've been doing it or 2 centuries now and it's time for something new.


The other common denominator is deregulation.

It's as obvious as an oil slick you can see from space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. 4Chan was saying that days before anyone else was. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Halliburton fucked the cement job
There's a big fucking surprise.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. That's the bottom of it. Methane gas, natural gas, all gas is just that,
and if annular pressure had been maintained, no gas could have done anything but stayed right where it should - below the wellhead.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barackbaby Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. How do we know it wasn't a faulty BOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Definite possibility. I've seen it happen
in my own bathroom after 4 7 layer burritos from Taco Bell. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Shouldn't the blowout preventer have handled this?
Surely a release of methane is not an unexpected occurrence when drilling for hydrocarbons. It's like blaming gravity for an an airplane crash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
23. How much methane are we talking about?
The methane that didn't burn will eventually drift into the stratosphere and contribute to global warming. Methane is much worse than carbon dioxide in this respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC