Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whitney Harris, the Last Nuremberg Prosecutor, Dies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Green_Lantern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 02:52 PM
Original message
Whitney Harris, the Last Nuremberg Prosecutor, Dies
Source: Time

Whitney Robson Harris, the last surviving prosecutor who appeared before the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, died at his home in St. Louis on April 21. He was 97.

Harris assisted in the cross examination of Nazi defendant Hermann Goring at Nuremberg and later wrote Tyranny on Trial, a monumental account of the major war crimes trial.


In recent years, Harris devoted his energies primarily to speaking, writing, and teaching in the area of international law and justice. He was a strong supporter of modern international tribunals, including the court for the former Yugoslavia, the court for Rwanda, and the International Criminal Court. "We should not fear," said Harris, "to establish the principles of law which will permit civilization to survive."





Read more: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1984149,00.html?xid=rss-topstories&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+time%2Ftopstories+%28TIME%3A+Top+Stories%29&utm_content=Google+Reader
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm kind of sorry he went
before we could bring the most recent, homegrown crop of war criminals to justice. . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Probably died of heartbreak after hearing our current President say that
"Just following orders" is a complete defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Green_Lantern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Obama didn't say that...
When did he say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=3834913

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration on Thursday informed CIA officials who used waterboarding and other harsh interrogation tactics on terror suspects that they will not be prosecuted, senior administration officials told The Associated Press.

Even before President Barack Obama took office in January, aides signaled his administration was not likely to bring criminal charges against CIA employees for their roles in the secret, coercive terrorist interrogation program. It had been deemed legal at the time through opinions issued by the Justice Department under the Bush administration.


(Emphasis mine)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Green_Lantern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. well that's refering to following legal orders...
It doesn't apply to being ordered to do unlawful things. Torture isn't included under that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The orders the Germans followed were legal under Hitler
The orders to torture that are being referred to in my link were legal under Bush.

I do not see a distinction. (Apart from: "It's not fascism when we do it!")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Green_Lantern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. well I see some major differences
For one the Nazis were mass murdering innocent Jews whereas the CIA agents were interrogating terrorist murderers.

Secondly there was never any debate about what was legal or not in Germany the way we debated what could be legally done as far as interrogation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Terrorist murders? All of them?
Why have some been released, then?

Do you suppose that the Nazis considered the Jews to be a real threat? I'll bet they did. They were wrong, but surely that's what they thought.

And debating beforehand makes doing the wrong thing okay?

Please tell me you've just been off your meds for a little while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Green_Lantern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. really ironic...
No...I think the Nazis considered Jews to be inferior. They didn't fear them as a threat.

But of course the Hitler card gets played on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. You're not worth the fucking time
Goodbye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Green_Lantern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. wow saying fuck sure proves your point...
You handle disagreement well....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. How far we've come down since then.
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 03:13 PM by Turbineguy
The US was a beacon for the world then.

And this Man kept the lights on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Green_Lantern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. the world loves us when we save their asses from Nazi domination...
Or wants something from us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. The saddest part is that the RW has tried to change the history of what the verdicts meant
"but the Nuremberg trials said" .... what followed was nonsense about how the Nuremberg trials were precedent for the Bush/Cheney/Addington/Yoo/Flanigan opinions


Thank you Whitney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC