Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colleague Disputes Case Against Anthrax Suspect

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 02:11 AM
Original message
Colleague Disputes Case Against Anthrax Suspect
Source: The New York Times

By SCOTT SHANE
April 22, 2010

WASHINGTON — A former Army microbiologist who worked for years with Bruce E. Ivins, whom the F.B.I. has blamed for the anthrax letter attacks that killed five people in 2001, told a National Academy of Sciences panel on Thursday that he believed it was impossible that the deadly spores had been produced undetected in Dr. Ivins’s laboratory, as the F.B.I. asserts.

Asked by reporters after his testimony whether he believed that there was any chance that Dr. Ivins, who committed suicide in 2008, had carried out the attacks, the microbiologist, Henry S. Heine, replied, “Absolutely not.” At the Army’s biodefense laboratory in Maryland, where Dr. Ivins and Dr. Heine worked, he said, “among the senior scientists, no one believes it.”

Dr. Heine told the 16-member panel, which is reviewing the F.B.I.’s scientific work on the investigation, that producing the quantity of spores in the letters would have taken at least a year of intensive work using the equipment at the army lab. Such an effort would not have escaped colleagues’ notice, he added later, and lab technicians who worked closely with Dr. Ivins have told him they saw no such work.

He told the panel that biological containment measures where Dr. Ivins worked were inadequate to prevent the spores from floating out of the laboratory into animal cages and offices. “You’d have had dead animals or dead people,” he said.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/23/us/23anthrax.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Go, Dr. Heine!
No scientist that doesn't work for the FBI believes this story, afaik.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. K & R (n/t)
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. IMO the anthrax was from a military source
obtained and dispersed by rogue individuals with an agenda (Patriot Act etc.)

Cheney probably knows more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Remember when the FBI was "sure" it was some guy named Hatfill
These guys are the Keystone Kops.

There's only 50 people in the US that could have done this. They should hire some big city detectives to actually do . . . uh . . . police work on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. I suspect there are many FBI agents we need to frog-march to court and then jail. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buckrogers1965 Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-25-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. You don't think
Edited on Sun Apr-25-10 09:49 PM by buckrogers1965
that some rogue group attacked their own country do you? And the FBI is just white washing things for them?

Particularly since the timing of the attacks were right when the Patriot act was being voted on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC