Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eisenhower Planned Emergency Government

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 11:46 PM
Original message
Eisenhower Planned Emergency Government
Edited on Sat Mar-20-04 11:46 PM by htuttle
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=ap/secret_government

WASHINGTON - CBS President Frank Stanton was one of six private citizens secretly recruited and granted authority by President Eisenhower to run major components of the government if a Soviet attack wiped out many American leaders.

No public announcement of the appointments was made. Their existence was confirmed by recently publicized Eisenhower administration letters.

(snip)

Shortly after the 2001 terrorist attacks, President Bush (news - web sites) created a shadow government of 75 to 150 officials who worked in mountainside bunkers outside Washington to ensure the government would function if the capital came under attack.

(snip)

During the Reagan administration, then-Rep. Dick Cheney (news - web sites) and Donald Rumsfeld, who was chief executive of the pharmaceutical company G.D. Searle & Co., were key players in a secret program to set aside the legal lines of succession and install a new president in a catastrophe, The Atlantic Monthly reported this month.

htuttle: Seems as though Cheney and Rumsfeld have been planning on setting aside the Constitution for some time. In an 'emergency' only, I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bhunt70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. This has been going on a while...
Edited on Sun Mar-21-04 12:11 AM by bhunt70
There are a few pages in the book "The Crystal Palace" that deal with this kind of thing. It's a book about the NSA. I don't think it is a partisan idea.

edit - although I can certainly see the implications you mention about setting aside the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodehopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. definitely not bipartisan
When the stories about the Shadow Governemnt appeared around 9/11, the democrats freaked b/c they knew nothing about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansberrym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9.  Definitely bipartisan

Wake up!

I wish it were true that these shadow government schemes were only Bushies or right wing goals.


Consider that the Patriot Act was largely bipartisan - Hart/Rudman


And the grand daddy of all schemes "Freedom From War" was a bipartisan
act of treason. See excerpt and link below. If this does not wake you up to what is happening, I don't know what could.



http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/arms/freedom_war.html



THE UNITED STATES PROGRAM FOR GENERAL AND COMPLETE
DISARMAMENT IN A PEACEFUL WORLD

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

DEPARTMENT OF STATE PUBLICATION 7277

(below excerpted from final page)
In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force and all international disputes would be settled according to the agreed principles of international conduct.

The progressive steps to be taken during the final phase of the disarmament program would be directed toward the attainment of a world in which:
(a) States would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments, and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order; they would also support and provide agreed manpower for a U.N Peace Force.
(b) The U.N. Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning.
(c) The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the U.N. Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful
purposes.
(d) The peace-keeping capabilities of the United Nations would be sufficiently strong and the obligations of all states under such arrangements sufficiently far-reaching as to assure peace and the just settlement of differences in a disarmed world.
(end of excerpt)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. The interstate highway system
came into being as escape routes from nuclear attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. LOL
No it didn't. They called it the National Defense Highway Act, just to make it politically difficult for Members of Congress to vote against it. But at no point was the Interstate Highway System seen primarily as a National Defense issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Wrong again, mobuto...
National Defense Highway System
<http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/ndhs.htm>

Excerpt:

"From the outset of construction of the Interstate System, the DOD has monitored its progress closely, ensuring direct military input to all phases of construction. The National Defense Highway System was responsible for building many of the first freeways. Its purpose was supposedly to allow for mass evacuation of cities in the event of a nuclear attack. The Interstate system was designed so that one mile in every five must be straight, usable as airstrips in times of war or other emergencies."

Transcript of National Interstate and Defense Highways Act (1956)

<http://www.ourdocuments.gov/print_friendly.php?page=transcript&doc=88&title=Transcript+of+National+Interstate+and+Defense+Highways+Act+%281956%29>

Excerpt:

"SEC. 108. NATIONAL SYSTEM OF INTERSTATE AND DEFENSE HIGHWAYS.

(a) INTERSTATE SYSTEM.—It is hereby declared to be essential to the national interest to provide for the early completion of the 'National System of Interstate Highways', as authorized and designated in accordance with section 7 of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1944 (58 Stat. 838). It is the intent of the Congress that the Interstate System be completed as nearly as practicable over a thirteen-year period and that the entire System in all the States be brought to simultaneous completion. Because of its primary importance to the national defense, the name of such system is hereby changed to the 'National System of Interstate and Defense Highways'. Such National System of Interstate and Defense Highways is hereinafter in this Act referred to as the 'Interstate System'."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. one out of every five miles must be straight = urban legend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. I read about this program the other day...seems rather
unethical to me...scary too, with Dick and Don working their black magic on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Check this out too: The Armageddon Plan
(just found it and ties in nicely here)


Published in the March, 2004 issue of The Atlantic (http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/2004/03/mann.htm)
The Armageddon Plan
by James Mann

<snip>

After leaving their day jobs Cheney and Rumsfeld usually made their way to Andrews Air Force Base, outside Washington. From there, in the middle of the night, each man—joined by a team of forty to sixty federal officials and one member of Ronald Reagan's Cabinet—slipped away to some remote location in the United States, such as a disused military base or an underground bunker. A convoy of lead-lined trucks carrying sophisticated communications equipment and other gear would head to each of the locations.

Rumsfeld and Cheney were principal actors in one of the most highly classified programs of the Reagan Administration. Under it U.S. officials furtively carried out detailed planning exercises for keeping the federal government running during and after a nuclear war with the Soviet Union. The program called for setting aside the legal rules for presidential succession in some circumstances, in favor of a secret procedure for putting in place a new "President" and his staff. The idea was to concentrate on speed, to preserve "continuity of government," and to avoid cumbersome procedures; the speaker of the House, the president pro tempore of the Senate, and the rest of Congress would play a greatly diminished role.

<snip>

The outline of the plan was simple. Once the United States was (or believed itself about to be) under nuclear attack, three teams would be sent from Washington to three different locations around the United States. Each team would be prepared to assume leadership of the country, and would include a Cabinet member who was prepared to become President. If the Soviet Union were somehow to locate one of the teams and hit it with a nuclear weapon, the second team or, if necessary, the third could take over. This was not some abstract textbook plan; it was practiced in concrete and elaborate detail. Each team was named for a color—"red" or "blue," for example—and each had an experienced executive who could operate as a new White House chief of staff. The obvious candidates were people who had served at high levels in the executive branch, preferably with the national-security apparatus. Cheney and Rumsfeld had each served as White House chief of staff in the Ford Administration. Other team leaders over the years included James Woolsey, later the director of the CIA, and Kenneth Duberstein, who served for a time as Reagan's actual White House chief of staff.

<snip>

"One of the awkward questions we faced," one participant in the planning of the program explains, "was whether to reconstitute Congress after a nuclear attack. It was decided that no, it would be easier to operate without them." For one thing, it was felt that reconvening Congress, and replacing members who had been killed, would take too long. Moreover, if Congress did reconvene, it might elect a new speaker of the House, whose claim to the presidency might have greater legitimacy than that of a Secretary of Agriculture or Commerce who had been set up as President under Reagan's secret program. The election of a new House speaker would not only take time but also create the potential for confusion. The Reagan Administration's primary goal was to set up a chain of command that could respond to the urgent minute-by-minute demands of a nuclear war, when there might be no time to swear in a new President under the regular process of succession, and when a new President would not have the time to appoint a new staff. The Administration, however, chose to establish this process without going to Congress for the legislation that would have given it constitutional legitimacy.


<snip>

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0318-14.htm

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC