Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Microsoft Apologizes for Previous Anticompetitive Acts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 10:48 PM
Original message
Microsoft Apologizes for Previous Anticompetitive Acts
Microsoft Apologizes for Previous Anticompetitive Acts

By Joshua Freed The Associated Press
Published: Mar 17, 2004

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) - Microsoft Corp. apologized to jurors for its past anticompetitive practices during opening statements Wednesday in a case alleging the company's antitrust violations include word processing and spreadsheet software.

"Yes, we acknowledge that and we apologize for it," said David Tulchin, a Microsoft attorney. "The conduct involved competition that went over the line. The question for you is whether or not consumers were overcharged."

snip

The plaintiffs began their case on Tuesday with videotaped testimony from former Microsoft executive Phil Barrett, who talked about a memo from Gates directing software engineers to find a way for Windows to tell whether the underlying operating system was Microsoft's or a competitor's. Early versions of Windows required a DOS operating system, typically purchased separately.

Testimony from Barrett outlined during opening statements said Microsoft sought a way to have Windows warn users that it might not be compatible with non-compatible operating systems.

Barrett said in the May 17, 2002, testimony that Microsoft's MS-DOS was nearly identical to the competitor, DR-DOS. It countered Microsoft's efforts to portray DR-DOS as incompatible with Windows.



more
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGALIS16YRD.html


Bwahahahahahah!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, Microsoft is so sorry it is doing this with the SCO lawsuits:
http://www.opensource.org/halloween/halloween10.html

Microsoft has pumped over $80 million into SCO that is suing IBM and others over Linux.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. so anticompetitive behavior is ok
as long as consumers don't pay more. if all that happens is that the consumer's money winds up in the monopolist's hands instead of the hands of the vendors that actually EARNED it, then that's cool, right?

ah, laissez-faire capitalism at its finest. also known as THEFT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberotto Donating Member (589 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
3.  But when Bill Gates wrote the email about Netscape...
when he suggested they find a way to "knife the baby", they sounded like such kind and generous people...

Now I find out that Microsoft really is a cruel, destructive Monopoly. I just can't believe it...

History has taught us two important facts about Microsoft, they cannot innovate and they cannot compete. Every time they have tried either, they failed miserably. So how many people here remember Microsoft "Bob"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. But they are sorry now! We should support them by buying more of their
bloated crappy bug-ridden security-breaching illogical annoying anti-intuitive software.

PS I remember Bob - he died and was reborn as Clippy/Windows XP window side bars telling me what I need to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoceansnerves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. but!
john stossel says regulation is bad! microsoft's anticompetitve actions are good for the country-- why are they apologizing?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bill G. - Sure we did some monopolistic things
But it's not helpful to dwell on the past - it's time to move on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC