Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama May Prohibit Home-Loan Foreclosures Without HAMP Review

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 05:58 PM
Original message
Obama May Prohibit Home-Loan Foreclosures Without HAMP Review
Source: Bloomberg


Feb. 25 (Bloomberg) -- The Obama administration may expand efforts to ease the housing crisis by banning all foreclosures on home loans unless they have been screened and rejected by the government’s Home Affordable Modification Program.

The proposal, reviewed by lenders last week on a White House conference call, “prohibits referral to foreclosure until borrower is evaluated and found ineligible for HAMP or reasonable contact efforts have failed,” according to a Treasury Department document outlining the plan.

“It is one of the many ideas under consideration in the administration’s ongoing housing stabilization efforts,” Treasury spokeswoman Meg Reilly said in an e-mail. “This proposal has not been approved and there are no immediate planned announcements on the issue.”

She confirmed the authenticity of the document, which hasn’t been made public.


Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ahuuwBS8KYq8&pos=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Unintended consequence there
...While the review goes on, the bank adds on more missed payments and late fees and increases the debt. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They need to give the bankruptcy judges more power to adjust the loans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skyounkin Donating Member (722 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Soooo agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fiendish Thingy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. too bad congress didn't have the cajones to pass the cramdown bill n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Moratoriums like this simply lead to a huge spike when they are up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why "may"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Someone might not like it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Won't this create a result where the Feds then become responsible for all foreclosures that DO go
Through? I can see where that would be nightmare pr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Socal31 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Stop artifically supporting home values....
Edited on Thu Feb-25-10 07:21 PM by Socal31
The real healing cant begin until they hit bottom.

The banks are doing it by holding forclosed properties off the market, and the Feds are doing it by purchasing mortgages...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Too late for me - I lost my house last year
but I hope that it helps somebody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. So we are thinking about possibly, sometime in the future, taking this problem seriously?
Some "leadership".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-26-10 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Possibly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC