|
was duping the others (not the brightest bulbs in the building, apparently). She told them they had legal papers to move the children. She did NOT tell them that authorities in the Dominican Republic had warned her that what they were doing was illegal. Their first lawyer said this. I'm not sure if he is still their lawyer, but when he chose to represent the others and not the leader, he got "fired" by some lawyer in the Dominican Republic who may have been acting for the leader, the church or the accused's families (in a very confusing situation, where the families were here, out of touch with their family members in jail in Haiti). Anyway, after this first lawyer said this, and got fired by the lawyer in DR, the group in jail sent out a handwritten note that their leader was trying to control them, and basically, "Help!"
I don't know if this was a tall tale, to get them out of jail--or the truth. But it gave me pause. I don't think they should all be lumped together, until proven otherwise. And the Haitian authorities seem to agree--i.e., that the leaders (the original stories mentioned just one leader, but two have been detained) were leading the others astray, and they were apparently too dumb/too naive to catch on.
From the media descriptions of the meeting in DR at which authorities warned the group, it seemed pretty clear that only the group leader was present, not the others. (Also, maybe they don't speak Spanish--I don't know). This may have also been the case as to dealing with earthquake victim parents--that the others weren't present or didn't understand what was going on. I do have some experience of the kinds of people who are enticed into church missions in foreign lands, and, believe me, it IS possible that they were that naive, and just thought they were doing good and rescuing orphaned children. These kinds of people don't tend to question authority, especially authorities who talk a glib religious line. I'm not saying they were naive. I'm saying it's possible. Also, that is what they are saying. That is what their first lawyer said. And that is what Haitian authorities seem to believe.
However, we can't rule out State Dept. intervention, guilty or not. But if that's what happened--political intervention--why didn't the State Dept. get them all out? They're all Americans, I believe. Maybe the case against the leaders was just too strong, and overrode any desire to rescue Americans from a "third world" prison (in a country with 200,000 dead and barely any infrastructure left standing). I doubt that Hillary Clinton wants to be associated with saving child sex trade criminals, if that's what they are--or child kidnappers of any kind, for an adoption scam or whatever. It sounds to me like the church got scammed, and maybe they made such a good case for the naivete of the members who joined this "mission," and put sufficient pressure on, to get them out, and not the two leaders.
|