Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anthem to delay insurance rate hike amid criticism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 07:14 PM
Original message
Anthem to delay insurance rate hike amid criticism
Source: Associated Press

Health insurer Anthem Blue Cross will postpone its much-criticized plan to raise rates for some California residents who buy insurance on their own, after reaching a deal Saturday with state regulators.

Anthem's planned rate hike, which the state estimates would affect about 700,000 customers, averaged 25 percent and would have been as high as 39 percent for some.

Anthem Blue Cross of California, based in Thousand Oaks, agreed to postpone the increase from March 1 until May 1 so California could have outside experts review the company's complex and detailed plan filing, including data on the medical costs it expects to incur.

The California Department of Insurance had been working with Anthem since mid-November to get more information about the increase, Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner said. He wanted to have experts comb through the company's figures to confirm the new rates comply with a 2006 state law that insurers spend 70 cents of every premium dollar on medical care.

"Medical cost inflation in California is in the 10 to 15 percent range, so I have a healthy skepticism how they can get to 39 percent" and comply with the law, Poizner said.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/02/13/financial/f133045S10.DTL&tsp=1



Of note: Poizner is a Republican candidate for governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. He may be a Republican candidate for Governor...
This move on his part is very savvy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. DELAYING hikes
Whether it's a rate hike or a hike on the ol' Appalachian Trail....Repugs just delay.... Tom Delay, that is! Badda Bing.


You'll note a "delay" means it will happen later. But for NOW (and that's all that matters, now!) everything is fine and so Anthem is not the monster it actually is.... or something...

Also...I'm on the coast of NC buried in snow...so since that too is NOW....global warming is obviously a hoax.

This has been a message from Repug Worldview! Over and out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. See, protesting loudly, clearly and en masse is effective. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Then why did the California Department of Insurance approve it in the first place?
Edited on Sat Feb-13-10 08:23 PM by PSPS
Do they just rubber stamp everything that comes across their desk?

Anthem Blue Cross of California, based in Thousand Oaks, agreed to postpone the increase from March 1 until May 1 so California could have outside experts review the company's complex and detailed plan filing, including data on the medical costs it expects to incur.

So, what? The regulators didn't already do this? They don't have the talent on staff whose job is to do this? They have to hire "outside experts" (likely insurance company employees who will always see things in the insurance companies' favor?)

The California Department of Insurance had been working with Anthem since mid-November to get more information about the increase, Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner said. He wanted to have experts comb through the company's figures to confirm the new rates comply with a 2006 state law that insurers spend 70 cents of every premium dollar on medical care.

So Anthem get to raise the rates absent confirmation that the rate increase conforms to existing statute? Why didn't Poizner tell Anthem that, without his requested "more information about the increase," they couldn't raise rates?

Is Poizner's position elected? Or is it a political appointment, meaning he would be "insurance company friendly" when installed by a republican hood.

Also, notice the joke "limit" on profiteering -- 70% of every premium dollar is supposed to go to medical care. That's 30% skimmed off the top to fund bonuses, mansions, yachts, islands, hookers and, of course, bribes to the politicians to keep them in line. Medicare does the same thing with 90% less "overhead."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-13-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. I love how they act like 10-15% cost inflation is normal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. Another reason to remove the anti-trust exemption! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. 70 cents per dollar?
Man, that's fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC