Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi: No Hope For Public Option At This Time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 07:45 PM
Original message
Pelosi: No Hope For Public Option At This Time
Edited on Tue Feb-02-10 07:47 PM by kpete
Source: Talking Points Memo

Pelosi: No Hope For Public Option At This Time
Brian Beutler | February 2, 2010, 5:23PM


The public option already died once. Today it died again.

House progressives have been trying to use the health care stalemate to revive the public option. Almost 100 have signed a letter urging Congressional leaders to include a public option in a separate bill, which could in theory pass the Senate with a simple majority of votes. If that passed, it could be included as part of comprehensive legislation. But on a conference call today, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi put a second set of nails in the public option's coffin--saying it would not be part of any grand bargain to push ahead with health. And in so doing, she took a veiled swipe at the White House for not standing enthusiastically behind the proposal.

"The Senate never supported the public option," Pelosi said.

There was talk that there would be 51 votes for it, but it never passed on the floor of the Senate. It did pass in the House and, of course, I think it would be the way to go. But it isn't the way that the Senate went. And so I think that what you might see coming out of some reconciliation would be those areas of agreement that all three--the White House, the Senate and the House--had already agreed to...more than two weeks ago.

Read more: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/02/pelosi-no-hope-for-public-option-at-this-time.php?ref=dcblt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Died once? It's died a thousand deaths. Pelosi just finally called time of death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK! Nancy, RESIGN, or DO YOUR GODAMN FUCKING JOB!
WE HAVE A MAJORITY! We have the public on our side! Why do you lilly-livered corporate whores not listen to the people who elected you? FUCK YOU, Nancy. Lead, follow, or get out of the way. But quit enabling the fucking Republican obstructionists!

:banghead:

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Nancy is not the leader of the Senate. She did her job in the House.
Blame spineless Harry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I hate Harry, too. I just don't know how we got stuck with such spineless weasels.
Edited on Tue Feb-02-10 08:27 PM by Atman
But if Nancy had any backbone, she'd be workin' it. She'd make the deals, she'd talk to the right people. She wouldn't be saying it's dead, she'd be calling them all out and putting on some pressure. You don't come out and pronounce the patient dead while there are still surgeons working.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. "I just don't know how we got stuck with such spineless weasels." Somebody voted for them.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. We didnt get to vote on who would be majority leader in the Senate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. She has no influence over the Senate.
She is the leader of the House. Her sphere of control over the Senate is non-existant. That is just the way it is. She did her job in the House. She handed it over to the Senate and Harry did nothing with it, per usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. This isn't about backbone . . this is about corporate payoffs to our elected officials ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
31. Their Democratic colleagues elected them. Please see Reply 30.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. IMO, Harry is a scapegoat. He does what the people who keep electing him minority
and majority leader elect him to do--take the blame and keep things under wraps so none of them suffer at re-election time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
55. PO "would not be part of any grand bargain to push ahead.." Nancy, why don't you stand behind
the House members who voted FOR the PO and shut up about bargains that won't go forward. Get some gonads, will you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. How is what happens in the Senate her fault or lack of leadership?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. You're right...the Senate being assholes isn't her fault.
But it just seems to be a total lack of leadership. I lashed out when I saw Nancy's name, when I should have lashed out at Harry.

Either way, we don't have a public option.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. The Republican obstructionists were irrelevant. Democrats killed the public option.
Edited on Tue Feb-02-10 10:34 PM by No Elephants
Well, at least all 60 had a (D) after their names, except for Lieberman and Sanders. But all 60 members of the Caucus voted for that Senate bill. And Lieberman's demands were not, IMO, the worst of the lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. big surprise. (not.) K&R for info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crowman1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well that translates into no hope for another term in the House, eh Nancy?
Edited on Tue Feb-02-10 07:58 PM by Crowman1979
And your Senate lacky Reid as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Less than 35% of the American People ....
...support Mandates without a Public Option.

Thank You for confirming WHO you are working for,
and Good Luck selling this Bait & Switch Scam to America in 2010 and 2012.

Mandates with NO Public Option + Trillion Dollars Corporate Welfare = Republican Health Care Plan.

If I wanted a Republican Health Care Plan, I would have voted FOR a Republican.

"When given the choice between a Republican, and a Democrat who acts like a Republican, the voters will choose the Republican every time." ---Harry Truman

QED Massachusetts





"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans. I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans, family farmers, and people who haven't felt the benefits of the economic upturn."---Paul Wellstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Wow...that is going to go into my sig line (The Harry Truman quote). Super accurate statement. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
36. The insight and foresight in that Truman quote no doubt reflect the mind that made him one of the
greatest American Presidents of all time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
42. If they pass that sort of crap,
they'll find themselves with lots of problems with voter base turnout, and both registered voters where I live will be among those staying home. I won't vote Republican, but I won't be rewarding wannabe Republicans in Democratic clothing with my votes.

I can't believe they even bothered to discuss such a plan for so much as a minute, much less wind up supporting it. I'm beyond disgusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. THAT doesn't matter to THEM.
The "Centrist" Democrats (DLC) and Republicans BOTH work for the same people.
Their BOSS wins either way, and as long as the BOSS is happy....

The DLC Corporate Democrats would prefer to see a Corporate Republican win a seat than a REAL Working Class Democrat.

QED Massachusetts



The DLC New Team
Working Class Democrats Need NOT Apply

(Screen Capped from the DLC Website)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #48
51. Correct.
Good call, and flawless analysis. Glad to see I'm not the only one who feels this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
50. I think the Dem Leadership doesn't need our votes anymore
Edited on Wed Feb-03-10 02:12 PM by fascisthunter
fine by me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
56. absolutely true, Harry T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Come on Nancy!
We're dying out here!.............Screw these corporations and vote for us human beings!O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's not her. She's right. The Senate and White House will not back the public option.
Oh, fickle DU. We hate Nancy! We love Nancy!

It's not her. She wants the public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I agree
She can't just say 'kazaam' and conjure up votes/support out of nowhere (especially in the senate). It's hard to get stuff done in Congress. It amuses me that individual legislators are often revered in their districts, but when you put them all together, legislative bodies (and those in leadership roles) become giant scapegoats for what people dislike about politics. I'm not saying Congress functions all that well - it doesn't. But there's a degree of cynicism that colors popular perceptions of legislative bodies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
38. In my case, the acts and inactions of the legislative bodies created the cynicism, not the
other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
57. yes she wants it but should not give up on it, IMO. Fight like hell, although as a Dem in Congress,
Edited on Thu Feb-04-10 12:53 PM by wordpix
that's an oxymoron. :crazy: The Repukes don't like the PO so let's give up. sigh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks for nothing Nancy...
don't expect us to forget itx(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well there ya have it. I have serious decisions to make about where
my money, time, and support will go from here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belpejic Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. Nancy's got it right.
There's no way a public option makes it through the Senate, not even via reconciliation. I'm sure she's not just reading tea leaves; I'm sure she has it on authority from whips. That doesn't make it right, but it makes it reality. She thinks it sucks and I do too but for crying out loud just PASS THE CURRENT BILL. It will get fixed, and many of you Dems might, just might, get re-elected later this year.

I love Nancy's comment about the WH. Obama screwed this one up...he should have taken the lead earlier on in shaping this legislation. Instead he left it to losers like Baucus and Snowe, with craven lizards like Lieberman spoiling the mess further. All of the kick-ass Obama sentiment over the past few days notwithstanding, he screwed this up, and we need to be wary.

I'm many years younger than Nance, but is it wrong to say I have a crush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
53. It will not get fixed
I'm sorry but the same band of thugs in the Senate who wrote this horror are not going to 'fix' anything but us...as in 'fix us good.' If they can't fix it with the majority they have now, they sure as hell aren't going to fix it in the future.

I don't think Obama ever wanted the public option. His CofS called activists' ads trying to garner support for the public option, "fucking retarded." Does that sound as if they were behind a public option?

He didn't screw it up. He got the bill he wanted. Only problem? Him, the Senate, and the insurance industry are the only ones who want it.

Fix it now or kill it. I don't trust them to ever do anything except make it worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. Politics Is the ONLY Place Where a LEADER Can MAKE Reality
and Nancy proves again that she's no leader. Nor does she want to be.

She wants to sit on a soft chair in a swanky suit and have minions kiss her feet all day.

A leader sweats and browbeats and plots Plan A, Plan B, Plan C, and so on, until the result is right.

Thanks for NOTHING, Nancy Pelosi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belpejic Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. She can't bend the Senate to her will.
Reid and Obama can do that. They failed. That's why we have such shitty options.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. If the House Doesn't Do Its Job, How Can Anyone In The Senate Follow Through?
Nancy has to do her job, and not sit there and bitch about what other people are or are not going to do.

And if the movement fails, she won't be a party to its failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belpejic Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Demeter, I hear you.
But remember that Pelosi has to simultaneously find a consensus in the House about what they're basically going to give up AND present it to the Senate in a way so that the rotten Blue Dogs, even votes 48, 49, and 50 (whomever they are) agree.

The House is on our side.

The House of Lords, otherwise known as the Senate, isn't.

Get a bill through. All of the crappy provisions will be like the AMT--when politicians know they're going to get blowback they'll fix it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. Bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. Can't she force the Senate to vote on a public option? Get those ayes and nays on the record?
I bet she can. But the name of the game is "Protect the Incumbent." aka "Pin the Tail on the Donkey's Primary Challenger."

It's all now about K Street, C Street and incumbents who can spend lots on re-election. Voters/taxpayers became almost irrelevant somewhere along the line, while we were busy making other plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belpejic Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #32
43. No Elephants: She could.
But she has a choice: make a principled stand that plays well with the base or pass legislation that sucks on many levels but still advances the cause of tens of millions of people who don't have insurance. I advocate paying attention to the latter, because it's morally and ethically right. And I'm uninsured. Once I get a good job and can pay my fair share I'll gladly help people who are in my position now. And I'll hold people like Pelosi accountable if they don't make the system better.

Oh, and by the way, replace Reid, disenfranchise Lieberman, and remember who brought you to the party, Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. I think the Democrats are sliding right "off the table" . . . ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
24. Nancy got that jab just right, and Obama earned each word.
"As far as the White House's enthusiasm for it, you're just going to have to ask them."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganlush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. this is not her fault, she's saying whose fault it is..
..with her subtle barbs at the White House and Senate. If you're blaming her, you're not paying attention and shouldn't comment at all. She's about the ONLY one this IS fighting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barbara2423 Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. Nancy did a good job, the House Bill has a Public Option
It's time for Reid to go as Senate Leader. Are there any Democratic leaders in the Senate? When it comes to the Senate I feel hopeless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
34. My vote is getting harder to come by.
Somebody wants MY goddamn progressive vote -- then I
expect progressive fuckin action.

Kiss my ass Nancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
35. Medicare for all would be a nice public option
...and it can be passed with 51 votes.

Just freaking do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #35
59. dream on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
39. Ya think things might be different if our eloquent president got out and showed some LEADERSHIP
on this issue? Kicked some congressional ass?

Nah, just leave it up to congress and its corporate owners to do their job right so Obama can go make another nice speech somewhere while nothing changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lobodons Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-02-10 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
40. What about Bob: "Baby steps"
Just think if we could have had baby steps back in 93'. Just think of the lives that would have been saved. Granted, it is not what we want in totality, but pass this and in 17 years when this comes back again, we will not be at ground zero but will be at the next step which could be public option, but hey, it might be Universal one payer system!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
41. "And yet we still want to force people at gunpoint to buy insurance without that public option."
Edited on Wed Feb-03-10 12:09 AM by Zavulon
And some people wonder why so many DUers are so disappointed these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
44. Meh, are we really surprised? Come on. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
45. So which is it, Nancy...
Every other week it's: "We have the votes secured necessary to pass a public option."
The very next week: "It doesn't look good.: and then: "We have the ability to invoke a procedural vote to pass a public option."

I'm a little worn out from the emotional roller coaster, Nancy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #45
60. whatever the biggest campaign donor$ want, I think we'll get. Desafortunadamente
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
46. Then there won't be a health reform bill. It's going to have to be done state-by-state. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
47. Logic: If the bill has no public option, then Democrats will sustain heavy losses
in the upcoming elections. This is why we lost the Massachussetts Senate seat.

And the Bu*h Dog DINO traitors are happy about it. Their agenda is to destroy the Democratic Party so that it is ineffective in challenging corporate governance.

Fucking republicans in our party have to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-03-10 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
49. well gee....really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
52. The "health" insurance industry just wants the fascist Individual Mandate.
The "public option" was just a ploy to get progressives to forget about single-payer and support the fascist Individual Mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Green_Lantern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
54. Nancy wants a brain for Valentine's day..
Republicans are going to filibuster any Democratic health reform bill even without the public option. The difference is that with a public option it'll get public support.

If the GOP filibusters a bill the public supports it'll kill them in 2012. Nancy listens to what her fellow politicians want before what the American people want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #54
61. she may be listening to her corporate donors, too. Any big insurance co. donors there?
BigPharma, maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
58. god I cannot stand her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC