Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(U.S.) Army General Makes Pregnancy Punishable Offense in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 09:58 PM
Original message
(U.S.) Army General Makes Pregnancy Punishable Offense in Iraq
Source: ABC News

A high-ranking Army official's new policy making pregnancy among troops in Iraq an offense punishable by court-martial is raising eyebrows, even though experts say he is well within his rights to do so.

According to the Nov. 4 general order of Maj. Gen. Anthony Cucolo III, a commander in northern Iraq, the punishment would apply not only to the female soldiers who become pregnant, but also to the male soldiers who impregnate them, even if the couple is married.

Cucolo told ABC News that the policy, believed to be the first of its kind, was necessary to avoid losing valuable troops in his 22,000-member command.

"I need every soldier I've got, especially since we are facing a drawdown of forces during our mission. Anyone who leaves this fight earlier than the expected 12-month deployment creates a burden on their teammates," he said in a statement.

"Anyone who leaves this fight early because they made a personal choice that changed their medical status -- or contributes to doing that to another -- is not in keeping with a key element of our ethos, 'I will always place the mission first,' or three of our seven core values: loyalty, duty and selfless service," he continued. "And I believe there should be negative consequences for making that personal choice. "


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/WN/army-maj-general-makes-pregnancy-punishable-offense-iraq/story?id=9391242



This jerk also wants to apply this policy to civilians under his command. I hope the hell his commissary has tons of birth control from the pill to condoms in stock. Personally I think this is a numbskull policy. Nature happens General!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. So is a Sun Burn / GI stands for Government Issue
and that is what you are once you take that oath
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. And they didn't issue a family either
But I don't recall any commanding general saying that he would court martial a soldier for getting married.

I was in for 13 years and was stationed in Arizona, Hawaii, and two tours in the Sinai peninsula. Never saw anyone get court martialed for getting a sunburn.

Besides, the standard is that it has to prevent you from doing your assigned duties.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Yes, I've actually heard of folks being punished for sunburns. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder why the "prolifers"
haven't started screaming about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Meh. It's unfair for a woman to become pregnant and go home early
if someone else (maybe even someone else who's got kids or a pregnant wife) has to go in her place. And even if it's purely an accident, that's just a dumb time and place to get pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. In that case it's also unfair for a man to screw a woman in Iraq too,
unless he's had a vasectomy.

Why limit the policy to those cases where a pregnancy results? Any sex by soldiers in a war area should subject them to immediate court martial, and I mean ANY sex including masturbation.

We'd be out of the country in no time.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Hey, the dad-to-be gets punished too--at least it's somewhat equal,
though a bit harsh. Really, ladies and gents, either control yourselves over there or use super-duper protection with back-up protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. It MAY be somewhat equal but I'd bet that the women get drummed out and the men get a lesser penalty
because after all, they can still perform their duties all the way to the delivery date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brofdog Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #26
83. Actually no, no and no
Seven Soldiers have been punished under the policy. 4 women and 3 men. All 4 women got letters of reprimand. If there is follow on pattern of misconduct these are meaningless.

2 of the 3 men got letters of reprimand. Again, meaningless if you keep your nose clean. The third guy was a senior messing around with a junior soldier and he was married. He got slammed.

Women who become pregnant cannot perform their duties because regulations require they are removed from a combat zone within 14 days of their condition becoming known. Can you imagine the outcry if the Army "forced" pregnant Soldiers to stay in a hazardous combat zone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marthian Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #23
35. Troops in an illegal war
being told by an authoritarian that they better not get pregnant because the corporations need every soldier the Army can enslave. Is it fascism yet? And do you even care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #35
72. Stop playing the fool.
Oh wait... you aren't playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Socal31 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #35
75. Wow...
The holidays bring out the strange ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 05:21 AM
Response to Reply #22
33. They are applying it to the men who have sex with the women as well according to CNN
If the woman is court-martialed and the man who got her pregnant is a solider then he will be as well.

That being sad, I think this is a horrible horrible horrible violation of human rights. This General comes off as a monster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #33
66. Think about it. If the goal is to retain troops, why would they drum out the men?
The general may have said that it will apply to both but I doubt it would apply equally. The women can't stay in a combat zone when pregnant but the men can.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #66
74. No I think it would be applied equally as a deterent. They're interest would be to keep soilders
not oppress women. If they let the men go free then other men would think it is okay to just sleep around with women because only the women will bear the consequence. Then we'd have more women getting pregnant. They'd send the men away to set the example that would save more troops in the long run. They may be idiots because this policy violates rights all the way around. But you are putting your pre-existing beliefs that women will be discriminated against ahead of the current evidence in this case. So far the only person to receive harsh discipline from this new rule has been a male. Regardless the decision to deny people the right to get have children when they want just because they are in the military is wrong imho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. This has to be among the most insane things I have ever heard of.
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 10:10 PM by BrklynLiberal
It seems to me to be an excellent argument to allow the govt to pay for abortions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Are those abortions going to be mandatory?
Pregnancy of female soldiers is a problem. Either don't allow female soldiers or make some sort of disincentive to become pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. How about giving all the male soldiers something to make them temporarily impotent?
Edited on Mon Dec-21-09 10:27 PM by BrklynLiberal
That would certainly solve the problem....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Sterile would be more humane....
but the technology doesn't exist. Would you want something that "temporarily" did something of that nature. Seems like it could all too easily become "permanently." The other problem is that female soldiers will get pregnant by husbands, boyfriends, etc. during visits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. You may be correct. Sterile is more humane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marthian Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
36. Vasectomies
are now being performed so that they can be reversed. The general is an ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #36
41. Uh,,,,
You can try to have vasectomies reversed but there is no guarantee. Like I said, something "temporary" could become something "permanent."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
38. LOL, army insurance won't pay for one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Until they make infallible birth control, this is unenforceable and
will not be upheld.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crzyrussell Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Yes it can
Sex is prohibited in the area of combat operations.

People have been getting pregnant so they can go home and it needs to be stopped.

There is nothing illegal about it the prohibition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #20
60. Do you know the rape rate there? It's appalling
Upper command doesn't want to hear about it, either. Try proving rape when your superior officers want to make it all go away.

Pregnancy is not always a choice, buster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
68. It's allowed for married couples - and the MG has already backed-
down from the threat. Seems that four Senators were willing to make his life miserable for violating the unwritten UCMJ Article prohibiting "Stupid in Public"

From the Article, "Even before the senators took aim at Cucolo's policy, the general had backed away from his threat today to court martial women under his command who got pregnant."

The Source is ABC News, http://abcnews.go.com/WN/general-backs-off-threat-court-martial-pregnant-soldiers/story?id=9399604


Merry Christmas & Happy New Year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fine. Bring Everybody Home
I am in favor of communism on the most basic level--sharing what little I own--to keep even one more soul being sold into slavery to fight corporate wars for acquisition.

This is one beast that needs to be starved until it's small enough to drown in a bathtub.

Since when is the mission to supply Exxon with oil fields?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. In basic communism, abortions would be mandatory...
See Red China for illustration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Why is it the woman who always has to bear the burden?
Why don't they sterilize any man who has fathered two children?

Let them temporarily make the US soldiers in Iraq impotent...there..problem solved.
Along with all the other shots they have to take...they could get this little shot that prevents
them from ever even wanting to have sex..at least while in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. You tell me?
That would be true communism. So if you have twins and they're killed in a horrible car wreck, then you've had your chance? Once again, please list this drug that makes men temporarily impotent and can be taken regularly with no horrible side effects?. The pill is pretty effective. Most men wish there was a male equivalent. I know I would take quadruple the recommended dose. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
39. Your Ignorance of What Communism Is Appalls
and Red China is many things, but they only call themselves communist.

Furthermore, the one child policy was to keep the Chinese from killing off their entire nation by overpopulation, and it was an economic necessity which they are now easing.

Fascism is not communism--small c. It's always and everywhere fascism--just like this policy, the policy of Empire. Not of democracy, small d, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Oh really?
"Furthermore, the one child policy was to keep the Chinese from killing off their entire nation by overpopulation, and it was an economic necessity which they are now easing."

I guess this would be a military necessity then so it would be okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
42. Do you just hope that people reading your posts
Edited on Tue Dec-22-09 10:06 AM by Cal Carpenter
are ignorant enough to believe you, or do you actually believe it yourself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. I simply hope people look it up....
Are you denying there are mandatory abortions in Red China?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. No
I am denying that it has anything to do with "basic communism"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. Fairly basic...
China recognized that people would communally benefit from less population so measures were put in to help the people benefit communally. Very basic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Okay, let's play that game. Basic capitalism it is.
The USA recognized that we could kill all the brown people and control their resources for profit! To benefit the owners of capital!

Pretty fucking basic :eyes:

Thing is, US is pretty much capitalist, whereas few people but the Chinese Communists and the western propagandists (eg WriteDown)imply that China's system is anything resembling communism.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. I'm not disagreeing, but you forgot the red people...
That is basic, unregulated capitalism.

China used basic, unregulated communism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. No, they didn't
LOL, who is supposed to 'regulate' a nation's 'communism' - the rest of the world's capitalists? LOL.

The red scare was a long time ago fella. Move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. No they didn't what?
Not sure what you are arguing. Forced abortion was for the communities benefit. Are you disagreeing with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. You said:
"China used basic, unregulated communism. "

I said "No they didn't"

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #52
54. And yet you haven't made ANY argument as to why it wasn't....
I pointed out how it was for for the communal benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. I am appalled that I have to use the important milestone of my 300th post
Edited on Tue Dec-22-09 10:46 AM by Cal Carpenter
to simply roll my eyes at you

:eyes:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. Still no argument..
Nice try though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #55
64. Put him on Ignore like I did

You'll find the intelligence of the threads increases by 50 points without his comments to slag through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Well, if it weren't for my occasional exchanges with
folks like Mr. RedDawn...I mean, WriteDown, I would never have hit the 300 mark :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Where does this guy thing future soldiers come from - a stork?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Probably not actually born on the battlefield. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's not a beach party, it's a war. How effective can you be at your job if you can't control your
own sexual urges?

I'm just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. War is about subtracting lives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Surely the commander in chief will overrule that.
(The buck stops where?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. Hmmm....Immaculate Erections are Exempt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
24. I hope paternity is also punished in these cases. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. They are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
27. Oh the fundies are gonna love this guy
Interfering with Gawd's business of reproduction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
28. I think this is bullshit but, really, when you join the military the government OWNS you.
Nolonger subject to the Constitution but to the UCMJ.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
junior college Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
29. I agree with the General on this one
Just kidding! I'm not a conservative Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rozlee Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
30. For those big wigs, it's always do as I say, not as I do
You see, there was once a certain General that was credited with winning a certain war some
years ago. Many people wondered why he never ran for president. I really don't know this guy
personally and you didn't hear this from me, because I never gossip. But, they say a he got a 22 yr
old in trouble. But, y'know, we were just a bunch of gossipy soldiers who believed everything other
gossipy soldiers told us. So, who knows. The one thing that I do know for sure, is that these guys
definitely won't be living the lives of monks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #30
53. Just like Congress, who won't force themselves to use the same health plan they're pushing on us
Or like the Carbonocracy who live in giant houses and take limos to give their speeches and fly on private jets to Copenhagen.

I hear you, Rozlee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
31. How about rape???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mndnpao Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 03:27 AM
Response to Original message
32. The Task Force Marne Pregnancy Policy
I appreciate the discussion about one aspect of a general
order I have applied here in the combat zone of Iraq. The true
intent of my directive cannot be easily understood from one or
two brief articles, so I would like to clarify my rationale
for the directive.
	In this 22,000 Soldier Task Force, I need every Soldier I've
got, especially since we are facing a drawdown of forces
during our mission. Anyone who leaves this fight earlier than
the expected 12-month deployment creates a burden on their
teammates. Anyone who leaves this fight early because they
made a personal choice that changed their medical status -- or
contributes to doing that to another -- is not in keeping with
a key element of our ethos, "I will always place the
mission first," or three of our seven core values:
loyalty, duty and selfless service. And I believe there should
be professional consequences for making that personal choice. 

 	My female Soldiers are absolutely invaluable, many of them
holding high-impact jobs that are often few in numbers, and we
need them all for the duration of this deployment. With their
male counterparts, they fly helicopters, run my satellite
communications, repair just about everything, re-fuel and
re-arm aircraft in remote locations, are brilliant and
creative intelligence analysts, critical members of medical
teams, in all areas of logistics and personnel support across
this Georgia-sized piece of Iraq north of Baghdad, and much
more. Since I am responsible and accountable for the fighting
ability of this outfit, I am going to do everything I can to
keep my combat power -- and in the Army, combat power is the
individual Soldier. 
	To this end, I made an existing policy stricter. I wanted to
encourage my Soldiers to think before they acted, and
understand their behavior and actions have consequences -- all
of their behavior. I consider the male Soldier as responsible
for taking a Soldier out of the fight just as responsible as
the female Soldier who must redeploy.
	To ensure a consistent and measured approach in applying this
policy, I am the only individual who passes judgment on these
cases. I decide every case based on the unique facts of each
Soldier's situation. Of the very few cases handled thus far,
it has been a male Soldier who received the most severe
punishment; he committed adultery as well. Though there have
not been any cases of sexual assault, any pregnancy that is
the product of a sexual assault would most certainly not be
considered here; our total focus would be on the health and
well-being of the victim and justice for the perpetrator.
	I do not expect those who have never served in the military
to completely understand what I have tried to explain above.
Recently I was asked, "Don’t you think you are treading
on an intensely personal topic?" As intensely personal as
this topic might be, leaving those who depend on you
shorthanded in a combat zone gets to be personal for those
left, too. This addition to a standing general order is just a
small part of our overall effort to foster  thoughtful and
responsible behavior among our Soldiers.  

Proudly serving you,
Tony Cucolo
Major General, US Army 
Commander, Task Force Marne
Tikrit, Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #32
56. It takes a lot of grit to
come to this venue and so clearly state your position. Whether posters here agree or disagree with your position, they have to respect you for caring enough to respond to this post. Not every Democrat here on DU is without a basic understanding of the importance of your mission.

Thank you General for taking the time to come here. Stick around DU, I believe you could certainly add something to our discussions here.

Stay safe and thank you for your service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #32
61. Thank you, sir, for the response, and your service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #32
62. Roger that, sir.
I was under the impression that women in the service, when entering a combat theater deployment, were strongly advised to get Norplant put in before they jumped off. At least that is what I understand from my SO, a retired Army mustang.

I can understand the rationale. I can also understand that young, randy people, spitting fire and pissing gasoline in a war environment, are gonna do the nasty, especially when facing death on a regular basis. Something about biological imperatives.

You might re-read the story regarding King Knute for some perspective on that.

Thank you for your service, sir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #32
63. Then you must provide females the choice of an abortion
I would like to begin by informing you that this website has a large community of veterans and others who have served in the military reserves. Many others of us have family members who are currently serving in active duty. Most of us do understand how serious pregnancies are during deployment, but we also understand other truths about military culture. My experience is that many military females will never file a complaint when sexually harassed and even raped. To do that would at the very least make a woman's daily life a living hell, possibly ruin her career or even bring her further physical harm.


You must provide females their constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy if that is her choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #32
67. Dear General Cucolo...
I have read the pregnancy prohibition was part of a larger general order. Would it be possible for your PAO staff to publish here the entire general order?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
37. The general is right, by God!
Sex is a plot by communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

This must stop.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
49. He is right.
You're part of a team in a combat situation. But the punishment should be the same for both male and female parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. The punishment is the same.
The father gets the same court martial as the mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #49
58. See the actual General's
response to this thread (post #32). The guy has stones to come here and post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
59. General backed down
An Army general in Iraq backed away from his threat today to court martial female soldiers who get pregnant.

"I see absolutely no circumstance where I would punish a female soldier by court martial for a violation ... none," Maj. Gen. Anthony Cucolo III wrote to ABC News in an exclusive statement. " I fully intend to handle these cases through lesser disciplinary action."

Cucolo triggered debate, some of it angry, when his Nov. 4 policy forbidding pregnancy among his soldiers became public recently. His policy statement said violation of the rule could be punishable by court martial, and that it would also apply to the men who get female soldiers pregnant, even if the couple is married.

While legal and military experts said the order was proper, a spokeswoman for the National Organization for Women called it "ridiculous."

http://abcnews.go.com/WN/general-backs-off-threat-court-martial-pregnant-soldiers/story?id=9399604
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
69. The most important stake holder is the child and the unintended consequences
could be severe. A woman might choose to abort a pregnancy because of this. Also, a child might be denied a father. The policy drives couples apart.

The baby is the most important stake holder in the situation. Everything should be done to assure the best possible outcome for the child.

Also, abstinence programs do not work. Birth control does work and they should make it easily available to anyone with no questions asked. No general can stop the wind, tides, or babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #69
77. Birth control is readily available,
and in a war zone the overall safety and the mission of the 22,000 soldiers is in fact more important than any one individual regardless of age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #77
79. I'm not that Spartan but I accept that a thoughtful application of
the current imperfect policy is about as good as anyone is going to be able to do. I can't fault the motivation behind it.

Opening a front in the reproductive rights war is not wise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #79
81. I agree
that 'opening a front in the reproductive rights war is not wise'. People in this thread calling for free abortions don't realize the difficulty with that. The only way to remotely keep that sort of policy from becoming 'mandatory abortion' (which would be a complete disaster), would be to mete out the exact same punishment whether the soldier opted for abortion or to have the child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eringer Donating Member (338 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
70. Nothing new about a General behaving badly
This is just too absurd. His General Order makes the situation look like an epidemic. General Tony C. needs to get a life. Sounds like he drank too much egg nog at the HQ party. Time for him to return stateside, perhaps to a desk job in the Pentagon, where he can do little damage. I have attached something to help him get around his soon-to-be new digs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #70
71. Way to be an ass..... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #70
76. Did you even bother to read this thread?
Apparently not, or you would have seen the General's actual, personal post in response, to which you could have pointed out specific points in his position which are "absurd". Ever been in the military, specifically in a command position in a combat zone? Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
73. I will note that on EVERY deployment I've ever been on...
birth control was available FOR FREE.

Because the Command staff and the Medical staff understood reality.

If you are too stupid to use it in a war zone, you deserve a big career hammer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanana1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
78. And we're fighting the Taliban WHY? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paper Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
80. As I read this, I shake my head in wonder.
What more insane or unfair things can this government come up with. I have a better solution.

All soldiers of any sex shall not be allowed to unzip their pants except to go to the latrine or to go to bed with their fellow soldiers in attendance. Yea, it's stupid but no more so than this unbelievable edict.

I cannot figure out whether this makes me angry or makes me laugh. How do they even think these things up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #80
82. Seriously?
Do you know anything about the military or current deployments?

Your post screams that you don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC