Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maoists threaten more action in Nepal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 09:07 AM
Original message
Maoists threaten more action in Nepal
Source: AFP

KATHMANDU — The leader of Nepal's Maoists threatened on Monday to fight any attempt by police to suppress a nationwide strike that has paralysed the capital and led to violent clashes.

"This is our peaceful protest but if the government tries to suppress it, we will retaliate," Maoist leader Baburam Bhattarai told a gathering in Kathmandu.

"We are ready to withdraw our protest if our demand is addressed. Otherwise, we will be compelled to announce a next phase of protests after Tuesday."

Schools, shops and markets remained closed on Monday as Maoist activists gathered in the capital on day two of a three-day strike, shouting "Down with the government!" and "Restore civilian supremacy!"

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5juF9lO-7pYbUzfMRv_UDoONt9oBQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. A red-carpet welcome for Nepal
KATHMANDU - In what seems to be a balancing act, Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal embarks on a visit to China this week. His trip follows on a visit to India in August, three months after he assumed office.

Premier Nepal's Chinese hosts are expected to listen to him patiently as he is the head of the government of a country which shares over 1,400 kilometers of mountainous border with Tibet. His first stop en route to Beijing will be Tibet's capital, Lhasa, where Nepal maintains a consulate. The Chinese authorities have not allowed any other country such a diplomatic presence in the region.

---

In the course of substantive talks in Beijing between Premier Nepal and his counterpart, Wen Jiabao, an agreement of economic cooperation is to be signed that will offer sizeable development assistance to Nepal. An ongoing Chinese-aided project in Nepal is the construction of a mountainous road for a second vehicular link with Tibet, from Rasuwaa pass, which will augment border trade. The road is likely to be ready by next October.

China helped Nepal open its first road link for Kathmandu in the early 1960s, when the then-king, Mahendra, had to assure Indian prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru that communism would not be allowed to travel by jeep.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KL22Df01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Weren't the Maoist elected to power in Nepal? Or is my memory playing tricks? -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Silly fools thought that getting elected meant they got to run things. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. From article:
"A Maoist-led government fell in May after the president overruled their decision to sack the head of the army, and since then they have held regular protests."

What the hell happened? Does the president get to replace party X with party Y at his whim???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-21-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Army runs things, the president is an Army stooge.
The army is playing a game here to - on the one hand - avoid a return to guerilla/civil war, which they were losing, and - on the other hand - to continue to maintain its autonomy from civilian (Maoist) control.

The Maoists also want to avoid being seen as warmongers, hence the "peaceful" protest methods they are employing.

Both are betting that time will change things more in their favor, the Maoists are betting the Army will do a crappy job of running things (a safe bet IMHO), and the Army that they will do well enough to legitimize the de facto situation eventually.

The people of Nepal in general, of course, are way sick of war. I do not know how they break down in support of these various wannabe rulers. I doubt that anyone truly has a good grip on that question.

China's commitment to democratic rule has never been very deep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Nepal Maoists set a month's deadline to return to power
KATHMANDU (Reuters) - Nepal's former Maoist rebels gave the government a month on Tuesday to pave the way for a unity government headed by them or face an indefinite countrywide shutdown in a conflict that threatens a fragile peace process.

The Maoists, who waged a decade-long civil war from 1996, headed a coalition government last year after their surprise win in national elections under a 2006 peace deal.

---

The political deadlock has delayed the preparation of a new constitution and rehabilitation of thousands of ex-Maoist guerrillas living in camps, key to cap the peace deal.

"The Maoists want to be in the government during the constitution-writing process so they have a say," said Kunda Dixit, editor of the weekly Nepali Times.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/22/AR2009122200860.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hopefully this will catch on in the West
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Opposition party protest leaves indelible mark on Nepal's economy
KATHMANDU, Dec. 22 (Xinhua) -- Though the three-day general strike called by Nepal's opposition party, the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), ends on Tuesday, the protest will leave an indelible mark on the country's economy.

Since Sunday, Nepal has not imported or exported any goods via its land entry points, causing the nation a loss of millions of rupees daily in revenue.

Though data is yet to come in from all entry points, Nepal's state-run Rising Nepal daily Tuesday said the main customs check post at Birgunj town in southern Nepal alone had incurred a loss of 100 million rupees (some 13.5 million U.S. dollars) daily.

Nepal's tourism sector, that is gearing up to attract one million visitors to Nepal in 2011, has been hit by the strike that saw tourists stranded in towns outside the capital and struggling with luggage to reach the international airport in Kathmandu to catch their flights.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-12/22/content_12690142.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murdoch Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. One thing these newspaper reports ALWAYS forget to mention
What used to be the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), and is now called the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) got 38.1% of the vote, which is double the votes what the next closest parties got. But that is not what they fail to mention.

What they always do is talk about the other 61.9% of the votes cast, as this is a unified block against the communists. But one of the parties tied for second place in votes is the Communist Party of Nepal (United Marxist-Leninist)! So this "opposition to the communists" is not only to a large extent a communist one, it is also a Marxist-Leninist Maoist one! Within this 61.9% are other communist Marxist-Leninist-Maoist parties who have engaged in armed revolution in the past.

Somehow whenever they talk about how 61.9% of people didn't vote for the CPN(M), they always fail to mention how much of that 61.9% is also communists whose party platform states they are dedicated to communist revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC