Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Ordered U.S. Military Strike on Yemen Terrorists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 05:39 AM
Original message
Obama Ordered U.S. Military Strike on Yemen Terrorists
Source: ABC News

On orders from President Barack Obama, the U.S. military launched cruise missiles early Thursday against two suspected al-Qaeda sites in Yemen, administration officials told ABC News in a report broadcast on ABC World News with Charles Gibson.

One of the targeted sites was a suspected al Qaeda training camp north of the capitol, Sanaa, and the second target was a location where officials said "an imminent attack against a U.S. asset was being planned."

The Yemen attacks by the U.S. military represent a major escalation of the Obama administration's campaign against al Qaeda.

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/cruise-missiles-strike-yemen/story?id=9375236
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Reminds me of
Clinton strike against al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. Look what that led to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Others might say that Bush and the Republicans dropped the ball.
The Republicans were against fighting back against Bin Laden (when Clinton was in office) and Bush-Cheney refused to do anything about terrorism before 9/11 (in fact they and their allies facilitated it, but that's another story).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Looks like they missed their main target anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. He probably had the live video feed from the drone...
a little backdoor glitch that the neocons never bothered to fix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Especially all the neocons running everything since 20 Jan 09
the statute of limitations blaming everyone else expired 9-11-2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The Obama administration is fixing the glitch. They can't fix everything overnight.
Edited on Sat Dec-19-09 07:58 AM by CJCRANE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I'm sure they're right on it. :P But we're CREATING more terrorists than we're KILLING.
How is THAT immoral act - Summary Executions without trial (we are NOT at war with Yemen) keeping Americans SAFER?

Watch out for that blowback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. so you advocate the Bush/Cheney 2000/1 approach.
Edited on Sat Dec-19-09 01:04 PM by SlavesandBulldozers
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
44. Do you have the stats to back that up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. "Hey, I can see our house from that drone! RUN AWAY!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. What? Why don't you share your wisdom and tell us
what "it led to"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. If nothing else
arguments about exactly who lay behind the 2nd 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. That led to Republicans in the street shouting, "Wag The Dog! No War for Monica!"
And then Bin Laden got away to attack us on 9/11.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
43. What exactly did it lead to?
If you're arguing that the attacks on al-Qaeda's camp in Afghanistan is what led to 9/11, I've got to say, your case seems weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Boy....ABC pretty much reads like anti-Obama propaganda!
Edited on Sat Dec-19-09 06:11 AM by FrenchieCat
Yemen is our allies in fighting Al Qaeda. If anyone remember the Bombing of the Cole,
and then the bombing of the US Embassy in Yemen in 2007....that killed 16 people,
you'd understand why.

Yemen hails military cooperation deal with US
Sanaa (AFP) Nov 11, 2009

Yemen said on Wednesday that it had signed a military cooperation deal with the United States although the US embassy would confirm only that talks had been held on joint counterterrorism efforts.
Yemen's official Saba news agency said that the cooperation agreement was signed during talks in the capital Sanaa on Tuesday between the two countries' militaries.
http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Yemen_hails_military_cooperation_deal_with_US_999.html



As for the incident that ABC wrote about, the WAPO reports it from a slightly different context:

The United States provided intelligence and other assistance to Yemeni forces in attacks Thursday against suspected al-Qaeda targets, according to officials from both countries.

Yemen's government announced Thursday that its air and ground forces had attacked three sites, killing 34 al-Qaeda "operatives" and arresting 16. News accounts said several civilians also had been killed.
....

Yemen and the United States "cooperate closely on counterterrorism."

In the past week, Yemeni news media have carried reports of unmanned aircraft conducting apparent surveillance operations near the city of Marib in central Yemen. Marib is also the location of a 2002 strike by a U.S. drone that killed the reputed head of al-Qaeda in Yemen, Abu Ali al-Harithi, who was suspected to have organized the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000. Local media accounts suggested that a U.S. attack might again be imminent, because the 2002 strike also was preceded by sightings of drone aircraft over the city.

In recent years, al-Qaeda has expanded in Yemen, prompting U.S. concerns that the country could become an important haven for the organization. Militants have attacked U.S. missionaries, foreign tourists and Yemeni security forces. Last year, they targeted the U.S. Embassy with a car bomb and rockets. The attack left 16 people dead, including six assailants.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/18/AR2009121804785.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
33. I'm sorry, but with all due respect, I don't think you could ever bring yourself to criticize...
anything Obama. So unfortunately I have to take your comments with a grain of salt. I was with you 100% during the campaign, but too much has happened since then and I have soured on him and will support another Dem such as Dean in the 2012 primaries if he decides to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NecklyTyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. This looks like a practice run on an Iranian nuclear facilities strike
The military is testing the waters to see how Middle East governments react to military action in non-combatant countries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Except this was done with the cooperation of the Yemeni government
Try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pjt7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Obama is quickly making Bush/Cheney
look like hippies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. no he's not.
He's fighting the war Bush/Cheney substituted with their adventure in Iraq that cost us our economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Exactly.
The utopians don't care about reality, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. That makes it moral? Summary Executions without a trial? Are we at war with Yemen?
THESE immoral acts are keeping Americans safer? How?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. It's called combat.
Look it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Ah, it's combat!
Combat explains it. It's okay to kill civilians then. Sorry, my bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Combat = killing someone before they kill you.
No trial necessary.

Just because we have better weapons doesn't make it something different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. No we aren't at war with Yemen.
That's the point. The Yemeni government wanted to rid their country of bases of operations for a terrorist organization that is destabilizing their country and has attacked the American embassy before in the country. Since this means they had mutual interest with the US who was better equipped to deal with it, they gave approval to a missile strike against these bases. It's pretty ridiculous to expect Yemen to tolerate al-Qaeda terrorists in their country or for the US to not do anything about it either if the government is even ASKING for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. And that makes extrajudicially killing people okay
Edited on Sat Dec-19-09 02:51 PM by moodforaday
how?

The important thing to note is no matter how many times you are going to be told it was an Al Qaeda training camp, it could not have been. The Huthi (billed as Yemeni rebels, if that's who they are) are Shia people, Al Qaeda are Sunni. They're enemies to each other. Bush didn't understand this for a long time, but Obama should and so should we.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. The article never mentions Huthi, it only mentions al Qaeda
al Qaeda is quite active in Yemen. They may not get along with the Huthis but that doesn't mean they aren't there:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_attack_on_tourists_in_Yemen
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_attack_on_tourists_in_Yemen

If these camps were being used to plan attacks against US targets like the article says, expecting the US to NOT do anything about it beyond comical and really the type of thing I'd expect only from Freepers who believe Obama is a radical Muslim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
40. BBC calls them Huthis.
Or "Houthis", with an "o". They are not Al Qaeda, but they oppose Yemeni rulers. Basically Obama has used US forces to settle a score in a bloody internal dispute in Yemen.

The BBC article is here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8411726.stm
It is dated December 14, and refers a *different* air strike, that one by Saudi air force, but these are the same people being massacred: the Shia, enemy of the Sunni.

This article from Iranian PressTV references Obama's new strike and does mention the Shia "Houthi fighters":
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=114119§ionid=351020206

There's always the possibility that the Yemenis call on Saudi Arabia to bomb the Houthi (Shia) rebels, and three days later call on Obama to bomb some supposed Al Qaeda (Sunni), a different faction entirely. Not impossible, but unlikely - especially given Clinton's little raid on a Somali pharmaceutical plant.

In an y case, do you think Obama took the Yemeni government's word, or did he ask for some hard evidence that those soon-to-be-dead people were dangerous Al Qaeda terrorists? Could we see that evidence, or does asking such questions compromise national security?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
39. Why not. Homo sapiens has alway been a very
efficient killer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hey! Let's tear ass around with our KILLER Planes and Bombs ... Every damn where?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. self delete
Edited on Sat Dec-19-09 01:05 PM by SlavesandBulldozers
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmx19790 Donating Member (36 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
23. change we can believe in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. Did anyone seriously believe Obama WOUDLN'T take action against al-Qaeda?
Besides the Freepers that is. The Freepers kept spreading the whole "OBAMA IS A MILITANT MUSLIM WHO WILL SURRENDER TO AL-QAEDA!" nonsense up until the election. Oddly enough many seem to wish that they were right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. What Al Qaeda?
The Huthi - the Yemeni "rebels" who were attacked, are not Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda (if it even exists as a distinct entity) is comprised of Wahhabi Islamists, who are Sunnis - just like the rulers of Saudi Arabia and Yemen. The Huthi are Shia. That would mean they are sworn enemies of the Sunni, which is probably why the Yemeni government wants to eradicate them.

Unless you want to believe that every Muslim person killed by Western weaponry in the Middle East is Al Qaeda. I'm sure you won't be alone in that belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. al Qaeda is active in Yemen and was the target, not the Huthi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andronex Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. "Doesn't matter if they are not Al Qaeda."
We only need to say that anybody opposing American interest is... there is no need for a trial or any investigation, the national sovereignty of other nations doesn't matter, by definition people who have been blown to bits by American bombs are guilty, we should never question our leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. The real terrorists that impact your life are on Wall Street, not in Yemen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. So lets fire a missle at Wall Street.
}( :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. We already sent them a money bomb. They're good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. Obama lies as well as Bush and Cheney did when it comes to the Al-Qaeda bogeyman
and he is becoming a war criminal with his reckless drone strikes that kill more innocent civilians than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
53. Women and children are not "al-Queda"
And that is who Obama just killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. Women and children were not the only ones killed in the airstrike
Though the high civilian death toll from this strike some raise some serious issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
36. Over 60 dead, most civilians including women and children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Can a peace prize be pulled?
I was hoping there was going to be a very good reason for this. Looks like smth bushco would pull now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. In this Orwellian world we live, war is peace!
and slavery is freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. Source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-19-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. I'm looking for something a little more official than the word of the people hiding the militants
Shocking, I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Yeah, it's not like our government ever lied us into a WAR or something so egregious ...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. And geez, it's not like people loyal to insurgents gruops have ever lied about anything either...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. Would it kill you do do your own searching? Here's some video if that helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Of course it wouldn't, however, if someone is going to post articles
the least they can do is await credible sources. With that said, thanks for posting this. It seems that several senior al-Qaeda figures were killed in this attack (six of them) and several others injured, though many civilians were also killed. I think it's fair to question whether or not an airstrike was the best option available in this instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
U4ikLefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. I read it here
Though I'm suddenly having trouble connecting to the site.

http://www.thenational.ae/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091218/FOREIGN/712179866
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
54. of course this thread is loaded with armchair chickenhawks
Edited on Sun Dec-20-09 06:45 PM by Mari333
sad frigging day for so many reasons. sad fcking week. sad fcking year.
edit to add: I am delighted that "Ignored" on here is being "Ignored".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Anything constructive to add?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC