Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FDA Panel OKs HPV Vaccine Gardasil for Boys

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
canoeist52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 03:54 PM
Original message
FDA Panel OKs HPV Vaccine Gardasil for Boys
Source: WebMD Health News

Sept. 9, 2009 -- An FDA advisory committee voted to recommend approval of the vaccine Gardasil for males ages 9 to 26 to prevent genital warts.

Gardasil targets four strains of human papillomavirus, commonly called HPV. Males can carry HPV and transmit it sexually to their partners.

HPV can cause genital warts and penile and anal cancer in men. Each year, about 200 out of 100,000 males are newly diagnosed with genital warts, according to background information cited by the FDA. Penile cancer and anal cancer are much rarer.

Gardasil already has FDA approval for use in females ages 9 to 26. In females, HPV can cause cervical cancer.

The FDA advisory committee ruled 7 to 0, with one abstaining vote, that Gardasil's clinical trial data support the vaccine's effectiveness at preventing genital warts in males ages 9 to 26. And in a 7 to 1 vote, the advisory committee ruled that the data show Gardasil to be safe for males in that age range.

The FDA advisory committee reviewed three studies of Gardasil that together included more than 5,000 males ages 9 to 26 in various countries including the U.S.

Read more: http://www.webmd.com/sexual-conditions/hpv-genital-warts/news/20090909/fda-panel-oks-gardasil-for-boys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ruh Ro
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What's wrong?
Isn't this a good thing? Helps a lot with 'herd immunity' if we can vaccinate both genders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Actually it is a very GOOD thing
since boys tend to be the ones that spread HPV, however, there is a rabid anti-vax crowd that will descend on this thread shortly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Aw say it isn't so...
HERE?

Is there no safe place on the internet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlienGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. HPV is also implicated in oral cancer, and can be spread without sexual contact. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Scoot over.
I brought plenty for BOTH of us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Just out of curiosity, is there a test for HPV?
Can carriers be identified?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cha-Ching
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Catching autism at 26 would be terrible....
They may want to rethink this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Pray tell, how do you "catch" autism? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. From vaccines....
Don't you know anything?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I think you missed
the sarcasm... I hope... I hope I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. OMFG!
LET's just maim all the kids okay? BIG PHARMA MUST BE STOPPED! THIS IS ABSOLUTE INSANITY!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. A psychiatrist might help with the insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. K and R.
I wonder if they'll come out with a great new macho ad campaign to sell the new sector on the jab? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canoeist52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
15. Gardasil HPV Vaccine: Not the Shot in the Arm Merck Hoped for
From "The Center for Media and Democracy"

http://www.prwatch.org/node/7748

The Gardasil HPV Vaccine: Not the Shot in the Arm Merck Hoped for

Submitted by Judith Siers-Poisson on September 16, 2008 - 7:12am.

"With the start of the school year, debate has heated up again about Gardasil, Merck's vaccine against human papillomavirus. Since writing my series of four articles on The Politics and PR of Cervical Cancer last year, I have continued to track the developments and have noticed some interesting trends. While Gardasil has not been the financial jackpot that Merck was hoping it would be, there is still a steady push for vaccination and even still for mandates. Even though it has not played out as positively as Merck planned, it is too early to turn our attention away from their efforts to sell their so-called "vaccine against cancer." Merck's obvious corporate steamrolling has generated a public backlash and has also faced general concerns about possible health risks from vaccinations, along with conservative opposition to the idea of government health mandates. These reactions slowed the company's money train but didn't bring it to a full stop."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. and people said this would never happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC