Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brown wins G20 battle against caps on bank bonuses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:03 PM
Original message
Brown wins G20 battle against caps on bank bonuses
Source: The Observer

Britain and US secure agreement that limits on incentives would be impossible to enforce

Britain and America won a battle to stop "unenforceable" new rules to cap bankers' bonuses yesterday as G20 nations struggled to agree on how to keep the global economy on course for recovery.

While France and Germany had pushed strongly for a strict new system to limit payments, London and Washington argued that it would be impossible to police and disguised the greater need for banks to strengthen their finances by holding more capital.

Instead of the idea punted by Paris and Berlin, finance ministers agreed that ways would be sought to ensure bonuses were paid over longer periods – with no upfront cash payments – so they would reward long-term success rather than short-term risk-taking.


Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/sep/06/brown-halts-bonus-caps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did Britain or the US offer counter-proposals? Or did they just huff and puff and hissy-fight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's really difficult to enforce such rules when you don't even try.
The bad guys won this round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder who funded that battle...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. What a surprise.
When almost the entire financial side of the administration is made up of former Goldman Sachs employees . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Really. Profits over the greater good, once again.
The people were sold out on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Doing the least they could do, for (a) change they could count on. Profits over the greater good.
The shallow show of doing something while profiting their friends for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Because we know those CEOs really need that money in order to
cheat the common man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. There's a little more info on this here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Victory for the anglo-american elite; defeat for the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Not defeat; it clarifies the situation with the US/UK on one side and everyone else on the other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Exactly. As under Bush, we continue to be the "bad guys".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-06-09 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. Unenforceable?
It's called a top marginal tax rate.

Or, in the alternative, a capital gains tax.

Easily enforceable. It's done all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC