Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ashcroft Funds Under Scrutiny (Pincus, WP)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:16 PM
Original message
Ashcroft Funds Under Scrutiny (Pincus, WP)
Sunday's Washington Post. No link yet.

Ashcroft Funds Under Scrutiny
By Walter Pincus
(c) 2004, The Washington Post

WASHINGTON — Attorney Gen. John Ashcroft's 1998 leadership PAC, Spirit of America, and his Senate re-election campaign committee, Ashcroft 2000, raised more than $100,000 last year in order to pay a fine and legal costs for violating campaign finance laws, according to Federal Election Commission records and Garrett Lott, treasurer of both committees.

The funds raised last year included individual contributions and income the leadership PAC derived from renting out a political mailing list, according to Lott and FEC records.

The use of the mailing list rental income in the 2000 re-election campaign first got Ashcroft and his committees in trouble with the FEC three years ago. Last December, the two Ashcroft committees agreed to pay a $37,000 fine levied by the FEC, based on at least four violations of federal campaign laws.

... Ashcroft's role and the ongoing operation of his two committees continue to be the focus of legal concern. Late last week, the Massachusetts-based National Voting Rights Institute (NVRI), which filed the original FEC complaint against Ashcroft and his committees, urged Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine to investigate ``potential civil and criminal violations of federal law'' by the two committees and Ashcroft while he has been attorney general.

more to come
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
concord Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting timing ... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. "while he has been Attorney General"
Edited on Sat Mar-06-04 07:23 PM by revcarol
sweet words in my ear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep, it's stuff like that....
...that can bring on an attack of gallstones..:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, boy -- the whole cabal is under investigation....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe the stress of the story breaking in the near future
brought on the attack. But are we really certain he is terribly ill?:tinfoilhat:

Just Wonderin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david_vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. At the height of the Watergate
shit hitting the fan, Nixon got pneumonia and went to the hospital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Phlebitis
I thought that was what Nixon had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Deep vein thrombosis and embolism, hospitalization prevented testimony.

Then later, shingles, IIRC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. How could they print this while he's so sick? The Gall.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. did you mean
"gall-stone"?

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. And while we're at war against bongs and private medical records!
The shame!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yeah, all that too, such meanies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. An obvious defence: "Ashcroft Underfunds Scrutiny".
Drapery Department of Justice; may I help you?

,,,


Yes, we do. About what size?

...

About the size of Inspector General Glenn Fine? Well, that's ok, we can get the information from DHS, no problem. You can pick them up tomorrow.

...

You are most welcome. Keep us in mind for your cover needs. Goodby.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. So the Hatch Act doesnt apply to the head of the DOJ?
Doesnt the Hatch act preclude govt workers from political activity - esp of any activity when one represents oneself as a govt employee and/or uses any govt resources (eg time, copying paper, etc.) to do political work (e.g., campaigning or even informal 'lobbying' (ala writing your congressman.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-04 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. No, silly, it only applies to Al Gore making phone calls...
...from his office, or whatever it was. Evil Clintonians. Republicans are pure, Republicans are right with God, whatever Republicans do with their time and talents is A-OK by definition.

There, all cleared up? <sarcasm off>

Hekate

~~Life just gets better & better once your brain
is washed clean. Hekate~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. So what is he doing as AG if he doesn't know the law or doesn't abide
by it?

What an absolutely perfect example of a jerk as a leader and a citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I really don't think that any of the Bush cabal know much about any
of the jobs they have. Name one intelligent Bush* appointee that can truly be said to know exactly what their position is supposed to entail. These guys are just winging it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. He's doin' the job that the 'Lord' is telling him to do
Whether it be the Lord of Darkness, or the Lord of Light......I know not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. Well, no wonder the slime has taken ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. Fresh meat.
There's now a link at WaPo.

Ashcroft Funds Under Scrutiny
Money Raised for Fine, Legal Costs Related to Senate Campaign

By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, March 7, 2004; Page A04

snip

NVRI, in its letter to the Justice inspector general, asserted that Ashcroft violated the law by failing to disclose the mailing list as an asset in his public financial disclosure statements as attorney general in 2001 and 2002. Or, if he did not own the list, he and his lawyers had conspired to defraud the FEC by making the claim that he owned it, the NVRI said.

Bonifaz was joined in his letter to the Justice Department inspector general by four other nonprofit groups, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, Public Campaign Action Fund, Public Citizen and the Fannie Lou Hamer Project. They decided to write Fine having failed to get a response from a Jan. 15 letter sent to Deputy Attorney General James Comey asking for appointment of an outside special counsel "to investigate potential criminal actions involving" Ashcroft and his committees.

More:
Walter Pincus





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Let me see now...
...Patriot Acts I & II allow total invasion of the privacy of every man, woman and child in the United States by the Office of the Attorney General, at all levels, phone taps, surveillance, opening their mail, monitoring Internet activities, accessing library records, etc., etc., etc. That would give the Attorney General a complete monopoly on the largest targeted data base anywhere in the country, 300 million files with almost unlimited profile informantion on everybody. Damn, at todays rates for marketing to such specialized lists the Attorney General could very well become wealthier than Bill Gates in less than four years. You had better get well fast John.:puffpiece:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-04 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. Kick his Ashcroft.! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC