(Dear Mods: this is one of those pieces that fall between the cracks. It's not quite news, yet it is. It's not quite an editorial, yet it is. I see this as more a public statement by an important public figure. I'll understand if you don't agree and move it to Editorials, but it would be a shame if most of the board missed this one.)
'I learnt I had been vilified, crucified and made to look like an imbecile'
US tried to force the issue of 'smoking guns' without finding hard evidence
Hans Blix
Saturday March 6, 2004
The Guardian
On February 24, the college of commissioners
met ... The normally calm expert group heard some rather heated exchanges, notably between John Wolf and myself ... He said the document provided only a readable historical account testifying to Iraqi deception. Moreover, it spent only a few pages on events after 1998. What had the Iraqis done since then? There was also no adequate account of the question of unmanned aerial drones, about which Colin Powell had spoken. There was no sign of any change of the Iraqi mind, which was all that mattered.
The tone of his comments could have been more courteous. The disdain shocked and surprised the other members of the college. I felt indignant and I did not hide it. We had worked hard and long on a line that had had the full approval of the council, including the US government. Now that government seemed to abandon the line altogether. OK, but was it fair to combine this abandonment with criticism of our work for irrelevance and inadequacy?
The heated exchange was one thing. The concrete points Wolf had raised about the drones and the period after 1998 were another. The nearly four-year gap between the end of 1998 and the return of inspectors to Iraq was, indeed, a problem. We had little solid information about the period apart from satellite images showing a variety of refurbishments and new buildings, most of which we had checked in inspections without finding anything proscribed. We would have to admit, as it has been aptly put, that "you don't know what you don't know."
John Wolf supplemented his oral comments with a letter. "The genuine 'dramatic change' by Iraq would have necessitated that it admit openly, not under pressure, that it had and has WMD and WMD programmes. This change would have had Iraq voluntarily take inspectors to the secret hide sites. Iraq would have shown the facilities where production has/is taking place; Iraq would have elaborated the illegal procurement networks ... That is not what Iraq did. That is not what Iraq is doing."
more.....................
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1163427,00.html