Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP stole peek at Dems' papers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 08:10 AM
Original message
GOP stole peek at Dems' papers
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 08:25 AM by mharris660
I hope this story gets bigtime coverage
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/03/05/MNGS65F1MA1.DTL

Its amazing how fox has an entirely different view on the same story
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,113262,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Stole a peek"?
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 08:24 AM by htuttle
Is that what they call printing and faxing numerous copies of over 4,000 documents to others?

A 'peek'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
djg21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Justification is nonsense!
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 08:31 AM by djg21
"Miranda, who had been a senior counsel to both Hatch and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said it was fundamentally wrong to consider the Democratic documents as confidential, because they were easily accessed."

By this logic, it's not auto theft if the vehicle's owner leaves the key in the ignition.

I can't believe this guy went to law school. And, to think he was working on judicial nominations. Hopefully this ass will get disbarred and go to prison!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. "If I can take it, it's mine."
My two-year-old uses the same logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. My analogy. An opened window.
Edited on Fri Mar-05-04 09:06 AM by Festivito
Your home-office window is left open by your window washer. He washes your neighbor's house and uses their telescope to read a document on your desk through the open window. The neighbor sees it done and he photographs your diary, then passes copies to other persons.

Then, the neigbor says he: "didn't consider the documents as confidential, because they were easily accessed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Internet voting too I suppose?
Sounds like an argument any crook would make until the jury actually nails his butt to the floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wash. Post: 4,700 Files Stolen, Investigators Conclude
"GOP Aides Implicated In Memo Downloads
Democrats' Files Accessed and Leaked In Security Breach
Friday, March 5, 2004; Page A01

A three-month investigation by the Senate's top law enforcement officer found a systematic downloading of thousands of Democratic computer files by Republican staffers over the past few years as well as serious flaws in the chamber's computer security system.

The report released yesterday by Senate Sergeant-at-Arms William H. Pickle noted that two former Senate GOP staff members -- including the Republicans' top aide on judicial nomination strategy -- were primarily responsible for accessing and leaking computer memos on Democratic plans for blocking some of President Bush's judicial nominations.

Pickle made no recommendations about whether to pursue criminal prosecutions in the case, but he cited several federal laws that might be considered, including statutes involving false statements and receipt of stolen property.

Pickle and his investigators said forensics analyses indicated that 4,670 files had been downloaded between November 2001 and spring 2003 by one of the aides -- "the majority of which appeared to be from folders belonging to Democratic staff" on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Chairman Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) said at least 100 of his computer files were also accessed by the GOP aides."

Rest of story at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31803-2004Mar4.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Receipt of stolen properity
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. If I had not read it here, I wouldn't have known about it
This vaguely stirred my memory of problems several months ago. However, certainly I've not had the media inform me of the extent, means, etc. that I find here. It looks like one of the things (including Wilson's wife, etc.) that internet sites have to keep hitting and hitting on until our glorious media finally drags it's sorry butt in front of the people and report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. Any Repug Congresspeople
who saw these and didnt report it need to be forced to resign. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC