Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Weekly jobless claims drop more than expected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:13 AM
Original message
Weekly jobless claims drop more than expected
Source: AP

WASHINGTON - The number of newly-laid off workers seeking unemployment insurance fell last week, the government said Thursday, fresh evidence that layoffs are easing.

The Labor Department said that initial claims for jobless benefits dropped to a seasonally adjusted 550,000 for the week ending Aug. 1, down from an upwardly revised figure of 588,000 in the previous week.

That's much lower than analysts' estimates of 580,000, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters. The four-week average of claims, which smoothes out fluctuations, dropped to 555,250, its lowest level since late January


Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32311814/ns/business-stocks_and_economy



It's gotta be flat out embarrassing to be a Repig nowadays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would hold off on the celebration for now
Those are still 550,000 jobs lost.

Losing them slower is an improvement, but not a miracle, and it doesn't mean good time are here at last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree but at least the numbers are headed in...
the right direction. I fear the unemployment rate will still be at 9-10% next Novemember and the GOP will gain back a ton of seats in Congress?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. unemployment is actually closer to 20-25% instead of what is being reported, don't be fooled.
actual unemployment is not being measured, an arbitrarily capped figure that reflects people receiving unemployment is being measured. Unemployment benefits are finite, and when people run out, they are dropped and no longer considered "unemployed".

The Reagan administration began arbitrarily subtraction whole groups of unemployed as being calculated in the figures. -- a "recalculation" that dropped the then near 15% unemployment figure to around 6%, merely by creative bookeeping.

caveat emptor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Unemployent bennies have been extended a couple of times
Many people have been on them longer then usual thus you cannot really extrapolate the "drop off" number the same way you normally would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. If it weren't for the unemployment benefit extension...
the gov. number wouldn't be as high right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I learned in college that you should always automatcially increase rate by at least 150%
and that was over twenty years ago.

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. upwards of 25% was were it was
during the Great Depression. Although I know it is higher than the number the Gov. puts out, I also know it is any where near 25% nationwide. Do not be ridiculous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. not being ridiculous at all.
wake up and smell the coffee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I have. My coffee doesn't have liquor in it.
Edited on Thu Aug-06-09 10:42 AM by ingac70


Even shit jobs were hard to come by back then. Nursing homes and places like that can not be screaming for help for this country be in a Great Depression.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. setting straw man arguments is hardly a counter to what I stated.
I never compared this to the great depression, I said unemployment rates are actuallly closer to 20-25%, and I still stand by that opinion.
I have worked with statistics and am familiar with government manipulation of statistics.

all you have is calling me drunk, and saying nursing homes are hiring so my unemployment figures can't be correct.

not sure I understand the connection. You can have ONE industry doing well (and I'm not sure I agree with you on nursing homes, anyhow) and that does not a healthy economy make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. During the Depression there was no work...
for the unemployed to have.

There is plenty of work here if one is willing to take crap wages or move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. apparently you have reading comprehension problems.
and, if you'll forgive me, your last post sounds very similar to comments freepers make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Depends . . .
And most jobs don't pay enough to put food on the table, pay off student loans and provide a bed and a shower once a day.

A lot of the jobs are part-time, provide no benefits and pay minimum wage. People are at food banks not on breadlines nowadays. And lots of families are homeless. We have a long, long way to go to recover from this economic crisis. And we are likely to see setbacks -- possibly increased inflation in a couple of years with, again, a rise in unemployment. There is some progress but a lot of it is illusory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Sad fact is, we likely will never know the actual number
there is enough ambiguity in how to count it, and there is enough political reasons to do so, that the best you can get is a range of percentages. Somewhere in there is probably the right number, but I tend to ignore most of what they've been saying about unemployement. Too political, too vague, to open to "interpretation".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Yeah, I have read that as well...
We have Conservative Values to thank for this mess we are in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hugo_from_TN Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. The numbers are not headed in the right direction.
They are headed in the wrong direction at a slightly lower speed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. LIke heading towards a cliff at 50 mph
instead of 60 mph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. I guess that is one way to look at it??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. I do not think that means what you think it means.
I really hate the media manipulation of this statistic.

"The number of newly-laid off workers seeking unemployment insurance"

is not equivalent to:

"fresh evidence that layoffs are easing."

It overlooks that many states are refusing to consider people for initial claims in higher numbers due to their own budget shortfalls. Their criteria are becoming more draconian, and more unemployed are simply being ruled noneligible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeriousEbony Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. about 6% fewer jobs lost than expected
That's about 25,000 jobs saved! If they polish this turd long enough, there won't be any
jobs left to lose and job loss will be stopped.

I feel better already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. That's before the upwards revisions next week.
Continuing claims increased by 69,000 last week. And to make matters worse, another 140,000 people fell off the continuing claims count, because they started collecting extended benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's even more embarrassing posting Propaganda like this, taking it at face value
And then proudly parroting to everyone how good it is, how everything is getting better, and how stupid the other side must feel.

It makes me feel even MORE embarrassed for people like you, no matter how well-meaning they are.

Wake Up.

You won't, but it never hurts to make the plea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC