Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Swine flu is spreading even in summer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
steven johnson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 08:52 PM
Original message
Swine flu is spreading even in summer
Source: Los Angeles Times

The pandemic H1N1 influenza virus is unexpectedly continuing to spread easily through the United States during the summer months, and health authorities expect a bump in transmission in about six weeks, when school goes back into session -- perhaps two or three months earlier than is normally seen with seasonal flu.

"Every year, there is an increase in flu when children go back to school" and viruses are being shared in close quarters, Dr. Anne Schuchat, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said Friday in a telephone news conference. "This year, it is already circulating in summer camps, military units and so forth, so we are expecting when school opens we will see increase."

Schuchat said she thinks the unusually high rate of transmission during the heat and humidity of summer, which normally sharply reduce transmission, may be because many Americans have no resistance to the virus from prior exposure. But there are "no data" to suggest why transmission is continuing, she said.

As of Friday, the CDC reported more than 40,000 laboratory-confirmed cases of the virus (commonly known as swine flu), 4,800 hospitalizations and 263 deaths. Experts believe more than a million Americans have been infected, however. Schuchat said the CDC would probably stop reporting cases soon because most people who are infected don't get tested.



Read more:
http://mobile.latimes.com/inf/infomo;JSESSIONID=28B03E14B736F151195C.3147?view=page8&feed:a=latimes_1min&feed:c=topstories&feed:i=48127998&nopaging=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
50. Why are you thankful about this?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #50
60. Info.
Sometimes I don't have time to keep up with latest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. "---most people who are infected don't get tested" I think I'll
stop worrying about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And most people who get sick
just get sick, like with a cold, and recover. The number of fatalities in comparison to the number of reported cases doesn't look all that significant.

More people are still dead from the flu...................................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. World wide the death rate is .5 %
or 1 in 200 infections.

The CDC is predicting 30,000,000 cases in the US alone.

That's 150,000 deaths.

The death rate is steady even when just examining recent infections.

30 M is a very likely number, given that almost no one is resistant to this variant of H1N1.

That it is spreading even in the summer time is indicative of how virulent this flu is.

And the thing to really worry about is that it might mutate soon. The more it spreads, the greater the chance of a mutation that is even worse.

For all those who think this is nothing to be bothered with, no worse than any other flu, well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. How do those numbers compare
to last season's flu?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. It's higher than the normal "flu"
which is to say, one of the more garden variety flu viruses.

But the big difference is WHO it's killing. Normal flu viruses kill off the elderly and compromised children and occasional adults with immune system problems. This one is killing more at random, even selecting perfectly healthy adults.

I'm not hitting the panic button, but this one is worth watching in the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. There are days I feel like doing this
:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

Far less painful... than trying to educate some folks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I agree - it's certainly worth watching -
that's without dispute.

I've read that many, if not most of the fatalities had other illnesses that made them susceptible, and that might be what's skewing the statistics regarding age. It seems to be hitting everyone, as you pointed out, but the sick ones are dying.

Even in this thread, there are people who got sick, fit the symptoms of the H1N1 flu, but have been told by their doctors not to bother coming in.

The one thing that has stuck with me is that Tamiflu has been found to make things a whole lot worse for people infected with this flu virus. That's alarming..................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #31
48. Most managed care clinics ask you to stay home if you are contagious.
Unless you have a fever higher than X, or are faced with imminent danger of death (then they say to go to the ER).

Don't take any comfort in HMOs telling you to stay home, they do that with "regular" flu too. It's a numbers game, most will live. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #48
54. None of the people I referred to
were member of HMOs. Private physicians.

I don't know how you got HMO from my post, but it's good information................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #54
63. LOL. I guess I assume everyone's on managed care these days.
:D Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. That's what we've come to, though -
your assumption made a whole lot of sense, and I should have been more explicit.

How badly does that suck?

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #21
52. 30,00-35,000 people die of flu in the US, every year
use that as a baseline comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #52
66. That is actually a made up number
used all the time.
This from the cdc
This estimate came from a 2003 study published in the Journal of the American Medication Association (JAMA), which looked at the 1990-91 through the 1998-99 flu seasons <10>. Statistical modeling was used to estimate how many flu-related deaths occurred among people whose underlying cause of death on their death certificate was listed as a respiratory or circulatory disease.

and
Does CDC know the exact number of people who die from flu each year?

CDC does not know exactly how many people die from flu each year. There are several reasons for this: First, states are not required to report individual flu cases or deaths of people older than 18 years of age to CDC. Second, influenza is infrequently listed on death certificates of people who die from flu-related complications <12>. Third, many flu-related deaths occur one or two weeks after a person’s initial infection, either because the person may develop a secondary bacterial co-infection (such as a staph infection) <1,8,11> or because influenza can aggravate an existing chronic illness (such as congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) <3>.

Also, most people who die from flu-related complications are not tested for flu, or they seek medical care later in their illness when influenza can no longer be detected from respiratory samples. Influenza tests are only likely to detect influenza if performed within a week after onset of illness. For these reasons, many flu-related deaths may not be recorded on death certificates. These are some of the reasons that CDC and other public health agencies in the United States and other countries use statistical models to estimate the annual number of flu-related deaths. (Flu deaths in children were made a nationally notifiable condition in 2004, and since then, states have been required to report flu-related child deaths in the United States through the Influenza Associated Pediatric Mortality Surveillance System).
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/disease/us_flu-related_deaths.htm

You would think with all the technology we have now we would have a more accurate measure of this sort of thing. The WHO announced they are stopping keeping record of numbers of cases and most countries have quit testing all but clusters and hospitalized cases. It seems a shame to me. With all the tools we have available in this day and age, for research purposes and for future generations this info would be great to know. Never before have we had such great communication technology or testing ability. It would be invaluable info for the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. That is information provided by the CDC
Edited on Sun Jul-19-09 08:16 PM by NJmaverick
the only one making things up is you. Why you are doing that, could be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. Yes and the cdc
is itself saying it is a made up number. Why I am doing what? I am a retired nurse with an interest in emerging infectious diseases. I have been following pandemic planning intently for the past five years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #72
74. it's an estimate, like the cdc's estimate of the number of cases, so i guess
they're all "made up" numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #74
83. I know it is an estimate. I posted the way they came up with it.
It is quoted as an absolute number in just about every flu article every year. It was devised from a few studies. It is altogether possible for the number to be way over or under as no one keeps track. Every year the same number is quoted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #72
79. I don't think you understand the difference between an estimate
Edited on Mon Jul-20-09 07:36 AM by NJmaverick
and a made up number. While you have been "following" pandemic planning, I am actually involved in the planning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #79
82. I understand that it is not a true number of actual counted cases
I have family members involved in the planning on a federal level and I have been involved in planning on a business level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Expect usual crowd to make fun
but thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
51. Why are you tnakful?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #51
61. Why are you a sour-puss?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #61
70. I work in public health and the last thing we need is ill informed
fear mongers trying to create a public panic for reasons unknown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. I'm a nurse. I like all the info I might have missed. Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #71
80. Did you miss this one?
At the current time, CDC estimates that the pandemic situation in the U.S. would be equivalent to a pandemic severity index of 2. (This would be most similar to the 1957 influenza pandemic, however, it’s uncertain how the current situation will evolve over the comingmonths so it’s not possible to make a predication about deaths at this time.)


* The PSI scale ranges from Category 1 to Category 5 and is comparable to the U.S. hurricane severity index. • Category 1 is the least severe and Category 5 is the most severe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #80
84. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why is this of interest? The scare headlines?
:shrug: There's always a flu around. The constant attention seems to be some kind of hype or terror threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jake Stillow Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I agree. This was a very useless article
Edited on Sat Jul-18-09 09:33 PM by Jake Stillow
Absolutely no data for summer infections was provided. We are simply told that the virus is spreading easily, and we are to believe it blindly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Here perhaps the CDC will be of education to you
http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/

Oh and welcome to DU... but before screaming IT IS TERRA... get the fucking information!

By the way, it is not spreading and it is just panic... but my nephew has it, the other one may get it too, you know kids.

:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jake Stillow Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
53. Your nephew will be fine. Trust me
Edited on Sun Jul-19-09 10:04 AM by Jake Stillow
And nobody in my family has it. And thanks for the link but I was expecting a link to the statistics, not a link to the homepage of a page that may have statistics showing the upsurge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
75. why are you invariably personally rude to anyone who disagrees with you?
it's annoying.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
33. I don't see it as a hype or terror threat.

I just think that worldwide communications have gotten to the point where the tracking of flu outbreaks can become common knowledge. People could then take measures to avoid it and slow the spread. (Which people will get better and better at the more such outbreaks are reported). I don't really see anybody panicking over this. It's just more news, and probably some of the most practical news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
45. maybe you should check the CDC website- this is not flu season in the US
however knowing that requires basic biology which is in short supplies on political web sites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'd think in this case more people than usual are getting tested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Actually no, my BIL called and they are not doing any of the testing
Edited on Sat Jul-18-09 09:38 PM by nadinbrzezinski
unless you get a fever above a certain point... you know triage.

The differential is cheap, but the actual test for H1N1 IS NOT

How do I know? I got it earlier in the summer, no testing, and they did not test the kids either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. It's costly to do testing. If you think you had it and recovered
then that's a good thing. If you were very ill, you might have been tested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. If I did have it, well it was extremely mild
general malaise, light fever for two weeks and some coughing. My concern was the ashtma to be honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. My daughter was sick with something like that for two weeks...
not bad enough to go to the doctor she said...but just in general feeling lousy and coughing with slight fever. She's better now but two weeks seems long for a Summer cold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I called the triage nurse and asked if they wanted to test
for the sake of stats.

Nope, they have a protocol, but instructed, if it gets worst... fever spikes, the rest of it, don't think about waiting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RayOfHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. How high of a fever, did they say? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. 103 I think
and given the costs of the tests makes some crazy sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RayOfHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Wonderful. I'm laying here with my 7 yo who just sprung a 103.5 fever out of nowhere
and has developed a runny nose and cough out of the blue. There's been an outbreak and some summer camp closing near us due to swine flu. (mods, don't delete, I'm not asking for med advice).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. If i remember correctly, you are supposedt to take...
Edited on Sat Jul-18-09 10:28 PM by CoffeeCat
...a child into the doctor/ER if their temp is above 102.

I know you're not asking for advice, but you really should go to the doctor if she has a 103.5. Don't wait until morning.

There's no reason to panic. Your child's body is doing what it's supposed to do--fighting off a bug.

Take your child in and let the experts have a look at her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Kids spike fevers so fast,
and the fevers move fast.

Get the child to an ER - right now................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. If I had it, it was pretty rough. And it was summer (June).
Took three weeks overall to go through it. It came on rather slowly, though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
76. how do you know you "got it" when you weren't tested?
Edited on Mon Jul-20-09 03:37 AM by Hannah Bell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsBrady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
42. right as this all started in the spring,
my husband got sick several days when coming back from Brownsville. He'd been there twice within two weeks.

He got sick as a dog for two-three days....then a few days later I was sick as a dog. Mine lasted a little longer than his.
I ended up having to go to the doctor as I developed a secondary sinus infection.

They didn't bother testing, didn't even care that we had had fevers....they did ask us if we had traveled....I did tell the nurse my husband had been to brownsville as was in the airport....
It was probably too late at that point to test, but the doctor didn't even mention it. Just typically threw an antibiotic at me and sent me on my way.

I don't think private health insurance would be willing to test for this anyway.
They didn't want to check for MRSA when my husband had that, but finally had to, eventually.
Seems like the same thing to me. Sometimes I think the Dr doesn't check for stuff if he's leery of getting paid....duh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jake Stillow Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
67. That's a great point, Skink
Good observation. MOre people may be going to the hospital to check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. So, for those of you who have had the Swine Flu...
...or know others that did--what it is like?

Do the symptoms come on slowly... or are you suddenly sick?

Are the symptoms pretty severe and what are the symptoms?

Thanks for any info.

On a side note, I was checking out at Target the other day, and a manager walks by and
says to the cashier, "Sorry you're not feeling well at all. I hope you feel better."

I look at the cashier and she's wiping her nose with a Kleenex and not looking very well.

Geez...this cashier had to touch every single thing I purchased, to scan it all. Then, I had
to stand within close proximity of her and take my change back from her. All while she was
sick!

This really pissed me off, and I usually am pretty good about shrugging things off.

I hope I don't get sick from the Target cashier!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. I woke up with a headache
and a temp, mild

General malaise for the next two weeks and cough

But as I said, to me it was very mild, if it was that.

Hey I got my vaccine

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #24
77. you don't know you had swine flu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #20
46. Suddenly - typical of influenza. I was out for a week and severe brochitis for 3 weeks
Its harder on the lungs - supposedly more invasive based on a recent scientific report but lacks the key virulence genes that would typically result in abnormally high mortality rates. One concern is it will sort genes with the typical influenza this fall because both will be prevalent at the same time and gain those genes.

Some don't get too sick, fever can vary, severe cough, chest congestion, severe fatigue, sometimes some weird symptoms - nausea, dizziness, disorientation, fainting or almost fainting. Respiratory distress if it occurs is a bad sign and one should then get help immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. Do a search 60 minutes 1976 swine flu documentary
This was televised once. It's relevant to what's happening today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Except that in '76 it was CONTAINED at Ft Dix
and now it is in widespread all over the place and fits the definition of WHO for a pandemic.

Facts, I know, they are pesky at times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boddingham Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. Have any "swine" been infected?
Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Actually YES... a few in Canada
the story ran about a month ago. They gave us swince, and they got H1N1 from their humans

Yes, that even ran on KO and was the FUNNY MOMENT OF THE WEEK story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boddingham Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. So, H1N1 is actually a human flu?
Or is there a bird part. I'm confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. It is animal in origin, as in piggy flu
piggies are very good factories. They gave it to us, and it started a while ago... Most times you get an animal flu in humans the human host may get very sick, but not infect others. But in time they mutate and they can go from human to human.

What happened here is that this went from piggy to human, where it achieved good transmission from human to human, a couple Canadian workers went to Mexico, where they got it and when they went back to the farm, the piggies got it. They went so far as to isolate that particular group until it ahem, ran its course.

:-)

And there might be some elements of bird in the H1N1, the reason, piggies are very good bug factories, as they can combine in their bodies human and bird flu.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boddingham Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Uh huh.
Edited on Sun Jul-19-09 12:45 AM by Boddingham
From pigs, to birds, to humans. Or was that from humans to pigs to birds. Wait, from birds to pigs to humans.

Oh shit, I'm confused, especially about this virus suddenly popping up in Mexico City. In the fucking Spring season. When and where flues never, ever have appeared before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. No from pigs to humans and back to pigs
and there is influenza in Mexico City, yes even in the spring. I was there when that mess started. What got them going hmmm was the fact that they got an uptick in influenza cases when it usually they crash.

But try not to get distracted by the bird elements (they are there)

Here is the actual chain.

The pig to human on H1N1 started all the way back to 1999 IIRC in Texas, There were a few cases... as in very few. Mostly farm workers.

The flu continued to fester and mutate in the pigs, which kept giving it to a lucky few humans... in the end this actually went from pig to human and from human to human in a town in the State of Veracruz very near a Smithfield Farm, that raises pigs, which came from the States.

That is the part of the story that took CDC a little while to get together. So very technically it started in the US... and it also explains the very early infections this year in both Texas and California that did not have a mexico travel history.

But there is normal, garden variety, human flu, Influenza type B in Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boddingham Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Isn't the human element in this flu just like the Spanish flu?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Nobody is quite sure, and the reason is this
The samples we have in labs are from late in the infection, when it mutated into a very nasty strain.

Early on, like this one, it was very mild.


On the bright side if this stays this way and it has not shown signs of critical mutations, it will remain mild. But there are never guarantees, and quite brutally honest, we are overdue as a species for another round of animal sourced flu

Yes we get them every so often, the other three last century are 1957, wasn't piggy but was animal

1968 which was mild, relatively speaking

1976 which we dodged bullet, as it was actually contained at Ft. Dix... we just didn't know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hestia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. No, it's bird to swine to humans. Just read "The Great Influenza" - all flu's come from birds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #26
36. And in Argentina reported yesterday. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. So more piggies are getting sick too...
serves them right

:-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #36
55. OMG!! This is HUGH! 11's. I'm Series!!11
Edited on Sun Jul-19-09 11:05 AM by dgibby
One of our swine here in SC was in Argentina recently. Sure hope he didn't bring it back with him!:evilgrin: :rofl: And speaking of birds, sometimes, I Quack myself up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
27. hmmm so why not make ALL school home schooling now?
Sounds like home schooling is the way to go. Sure would cut down on diseases. :)
Time to put school on all home computers:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
43. Crap, I was hoping this was die down a little over the summer
I'm traveling from Korea to visit home and worried when I come back they'll quarantine people. The Korean Government has been very strange about putting people in the hospital for two weeks even if they aren't sick. I hope I don't get on the plane with anyone who is sick on the way back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
44. Perhaps this is a good thing. Since it's still mild.
This may confer some level of immunity for them. If massive numbers of people get infected with the mild form, then we may have a level of herd immunity if the virus evolves into a far more deadly form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
47. This is not swine flu - it is an assortment that contains human, swine and bird genes
influenza and sort genes - this cocktail of genes may allow the ability to infect humans and a better ability to obtain genes from bird flu. Bird flu is not spread human to human effectively but this may be an evolutionary step which will allow easier and rapid conversion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
49. Question, question! (Hand raised)
This is a math question: How many people have to get the swine flu, develop immunities to it, before the bell curve begins to drop on the rate of transmission?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #49
57. Good q8uestion
that said, one million, CDC believes have gotten it so far... so we are not even near that point

The fall will be fun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadEyeDyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
56. this scares the shit out of me...
I work maintenance in a poultry plant until school starts (and then on weekends). I don't touch product directly but am still in contact with the residue. We were really concerned and still am with bird-flu.

Swine flu is still scarey. This seems to follow the 1917-18 pattern except that we now have 12 hr world wide transit and an extremely high population density.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanusAscending Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
58. I call BULLSHIT!!!
the entire thing is contrived. I had the swine flu back in the early 60's, late 50's, and am still alive. Anything to scare the masses and make money for big pharma!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Given that big pharma hates doing flu vaccines and I call bulshit on your story
Edited on Sun Jul-19-09 01:40 PM by nadinbrzezinski
you conceivably had it in 1957, and it wasn't swine by the way, and 1968, the Hong Kong Flu, which wasn't swine in origin either... neither of those two was a swine flu.

It was animal in origin, but not piggy.

Oh abd those two were mild compared to the 1918 which was swine flu, and if you told me 1976 I would have asked for your DD 214, as it was SUCCESFULLY contained at fort Dix.

I guess this conspiracy includes health authorities around the world and they made up the deaths in Mexico, the US, the UK and so forth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #59
62. second time you repeat the meme about vaccines being unprofitable bother for pharmacorps. Tiresome
First the bank bailout, now the repetitious hyping of swine flu. Do you own shares?


Swine flu shots to boost Baxter
Company reports 2nd-quarter profit increased by 13%, 2009 forecast raised
By Bruce Japsen | Tribune reporter
July 17, 2009

International demand for a swine flu vaccine is developing into a boon for Baxter International Inc.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-fri-baxter-swine-flu-0717-jul17,0,3826525.story



GlaxoSmithKline sees profits surge amid flu vaccine news
2006-07-26

British pharmaceutical group GlaxoSmithKline has said that its net profit jumped by 12.4 percent in the second quarter of 2006, after reporting a "breakthrough" in the development of a vaccine to protect humans against the H5N1 strain of bird flu. ... ...

http://lateline.muzi.net/news/ll/english/10015463.shtml?cc=46114&ccr=25405



Vaccine Industry Growing Amid Increased Funding, Higher Profits

Find other articles on: "influenz vaccine profits"
The Los Angeles Times on Sunday examined "a boom in vaccine discovery and development" prompted by advances in technology, "increased funding and higher profits."

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/61874.php



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. When every country in the world is ordering
it then it will be profitable. Whether than can roll it out in time remains highly uncertain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. bAxter is shipping vAccine this month. & no, it doesn't require "orders from every country in the
Edited on Sun Jul-19-09 07:52 PM by Hannah Bell
world" to generate profit.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-biz-baxter-earns-bax-july16,0,4264807.story

"Baxter said it would begin shipping dosages of swine flu vaccine around the world by the end of this month."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #68
73. Baxter's vaccines are using a new technology
and it is not approved here yet.
Everything is up in the air for now on how the vaccines will be formulated.

Studies aim to answer key questions as world readies for swine flu vaccination

By Helen Branswell (CP) – 8 hours ago

TORONTO — A flurry of innovative vaccine trials is in the offing as governments and regulatory agencies prepare for the probable launch of mass swine flu vaccination programs in the fall.

The results of the trials could determine whether people with egg allergies can be offered pandemic (and regular) flu vaccine, whether pandemic and seasonal flu shots could be given at the same time and whether one company's vaccine can be given with another's adjuvant, a compound that boosts its potency.

Vaccine manufacturers are either unable or unlikely to undertake the complicated studies required to answer these questions. Governments will fund the work instead.

Infectious diseases expert Dr. Anthony Fauci says the goal here for organizations like the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases - which he heads - is to fill key knowledge gaps for vaccine regulators.

"What are they going to need that somebody else can't do?" Fauci explains.

Some of those priorities will be aired Thursday in Washington when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's vaccine and related biological products advisory committee meets in a session on clinical trials for pandemic vaccines.

Vaccine manufacturers will do the basic testing, work designed to assure regulators and would-be recipients that their vaccine is safe and likely to protect against the pandemic strain, an H1N1 virus of swine origin.

But there are many other key questions. In fact, the list is too long to tackle in its entirety in the limited time available.

So discussions between planners and regulators over the past few weeks have led to a paring down of priorities. In the case of the U.S., it's not yet clear which studies have survived the cut.

However, Fauci says his institute will green-light one looking at whether the pandemic vaccine - to protect against the new H1N1 virus - could be given at the same time as seasonal flu vaccine, which protects against three types of flu viruses including a different H1N1.
more
http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5jjg08BzfzBK0fa14Uko8sI-CF8IA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #73
78. this info was in the article i linked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #78
81. No it was not.
I read your article, you did not read mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC