Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guantanamo Detainees May Not Be Resettled by Deadline

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 04:05 PM
Original message
Guantanamo Detainees May Not Be Resettled by Deadline
Source: Bloomberg

July 17 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. may not be able to move all eligible detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to other countries before President Barack Obama’s January deadline for closing the prison, an Obama administration official said.

The effort to resettle prisoners has been hampered by legislation that bars their release in the U.S. through Sept. 30, said the official, who is familiar with the matter and spoke yesterday on condition of anonymity. American diplomats, trying to persuade other countries to take detainees before the deadline, are being asked why they should accept them when the U.S. won’t, the official said.

On his second full day in office, Obama signed an order to close the Guantanamo detention facility within one year. A multi-agency task force led by the Justice Department has reviewed more than half of the 229 detainees to determine which ones should be transferred, tried or held indefinitely, another administration official said on July 15. At least 54 of those reviewed have been cleared for transfer, that official said.

...

Senator James Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican, said in an interview that other countries’ reluctance to take the detainees because of the legislation is a “cop-out.”

Inhofe said he plans to introduce a measure that would permanently prohibit resettlement of Guantanamo Bay detainees in the U.S. once the current ban expires.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ahSNd6FR4re8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Legislation barring them from release in the U.S. is unconstitutional.
"No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."

Article I, Section 9, Clause 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Inhofe, fuck you, and your obstructionist games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC