Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Weighs Plan Allowing 9/11 Suspects to Plead Guilty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:51 PM
Original message
Obama Weighs Plan Allowing 9/11 Suspects to Plead Guilty
Source: NYT

Obama Weighs Plan Allowing 9/11 Suspects to Plead Guilty
By WILLIAM GLABERSON

The Obama administration is considering a change in the law for the military commissions at the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, that would clear the way for detainees facing the death penalty to plead guilty without a full trial.

The provision could permit military prosecutors to avoid airing the details of brutal interrogation techniques. It could also allow the five detainees who have been charged with the Sept. 11 attacks to achieve their stated goal of pleading guilty to gain what they have called martyrdom.

The proposal, in a draft of legislation that would be submitted to Congress, has not been publicly disclosed. It was circulated to officials under restrictions requiring secrecy. People who have read or been briefed on it said it had been presented to Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates by an administration task force on detention.

The proposal would ease what has come to be recognized as the government’s difficult task of prosecuting men who have confessed to terrorism but whose cases present challenges. Much of the evidence against the men accused in the Sept. 11 case, as well as against other detainees, is believed to have come from confessions they gave during intense interrogations at secret C.I.A. prisons. In any proceeding, the reliability of those statements would be challenged, making trials difficult and drawing new political pressure over detainee treatment.

Some experts on the military commissions said such a proposal would raise new questions about the fairness of a system that has been criticized as permitting shortcuts to assure convictions.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/06/us/politics/06gitmo.html?_r=1&partner=rss&=&%2359;emc=rss&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. So we'd never get the full story? Avoid airing
the details of brutal interrogation techniques? Hide what we did?

I don't like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Plead Guilty to what? Let them go already, any true constitutional scholar knows what the past and
present presidents are doing to detainees is a moral crime and surely a violation of international law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why let people who *want* to be martyrs get their wish?
Doesn't that seem a bit counter-productive somehow?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. If they're dead they can never reveal the details of their torture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. WTF is this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Change we can believe in?
What a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yet another FAIL
If there's no admissible evidence, there's no case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Boy, Obama keeps crossing the line to protect the torturers. What
a disastrous policy for the future of our nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. No, he is trying to close gitmo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. That is just too stupid
why in the hell would anyone think that is a good idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wow
All the Obama negativity here, it is attitudes like that which created Bushitler and gave rise to all these problems. If it solves the problem then so be it. Lets move on to the bigger problems this nation faces. Obama is trying to heal the war wounds and fix the problems at a higher level or don't you all get that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Bigger than the rule of law?
Okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. That is not what I said nor what I meant.
This is not a shortcut it is an idea that the Congress can debate to create law to apply or do you see the current GITMO situation as Black and White?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. We have a justice system that has worked just fine for two hundred years.
Edited on Fri Jun-05-09 10:11 PM by EFerrari
And wasn't Obama's objection to Bush's program that is was ad hoc and created to skirt our system and our values?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. touché...
The Wingnuts would most likely eat him alive over it politically, I just get depressed hearing the negativity when the man is trying his damndest to undo huge problems. He needs our support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I understand that. There is going to be tension --
Bush left the whole government mined for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
choie Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
35. if he's trying to undo huge problems,
then he shouldn't continue harming our constitution - or isn't that considered important anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I'm sorry, if you break
your leg do you cut it off ? How does that heal the wounds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueclown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. If you are looking for a bunch of lemmings following a president off a cliff...
... you might want to try Free Republic.

We are critical of our president when need be. This is one of those instances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Critical yes...
No one offers any ideas just harsh criticism for the man that is trying to undo the work of madmen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Here's an idea: if you have legally
admissible evidence, then charge the detainees in criminal court.

If your evidence was obtained through torture, then set the detainees free and pay them reparations for your own violations of international law.

Q.E.D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. KSM the mastermind of 9/11 will never be set free
Edited on Fri Jun-05-09 11:48 PM by Uzybone
only a fool will think that can happen.

Then of course if you (as in conspiracy theorists in general, not you the poster) believe 9/11 was an inside job then KSM is guilty of nothing.

Its a tough spot....no matter how simple some want to say it is. The US is not going to set free the self confessed mastermind of 9/11 on technicalities (yes I know we broke our own laws torturing him). At the same time we want some pretense of abiding with the law even though the past admin has made than damn near impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Is the evidence against KSM
legally admissible in a court of law?

If so, then charge him.

Obtained through torture, you say? Then sorry, "poisoned fruit" and all that.

Why else do you think Obama is keeping the kangaroo courts (aka "military commissions")in session than to deny these detainees due process?

It's really disgusting watching Obama sell us out, along with his own principles. At least with Hillary, we knew we were getting a pig. To think I held an Obama sign before the election -- I was punked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. THIS is not undoing that work.
THIS is continuing that work and, even, doing it worse. IF he does this, he can go to hell. I have had enough of this undemocratic bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Yes, you're right. Let's just murder these people and "go forward."
Never mind they're just goat herders "turned in" for the $5,000 per head we were offering, and they decided to admit to anything to stop the torture. Who cares about their lives so long as we can all "come to Obama!!111!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. the End Doesn't Even Justify the End, Let alone the Means!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. Win-win for Obama AND the terrorists! LOSE for the rest of us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pjt7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Obama has to gag these prisoners
#1 Some of them are going to show that 9.11 was phoney

#2 They have been tortured

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-05-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm appalled and disappointed by this. It's entirely counterproductive.
What's the reasoning behind this? He can't release the torture photo's because it will outrage people and endanger our troops. But apparently he doesn't have a problem with making these men Martyrs. Which will encourage and embolden the extremists and endanger our troops. This simply is not a suitable solution to the question of what to do with them.

Also I would really hate to see this endanger or wipe out all the good will he just earned in his Middle East tour. He has to up hold American law. But maybe he should take a cue from Islamic law. Ask the victims and the families of the victims their position on this. It's symbolic, unofficial and nonbinding. But it could have some diplomatic value. At least then he can say I tried to look at this through your eyes with your ways. As part of my decision making process. But ultimately I have to uphold American law. That shows a respect that could combat perceived, purported or extremist promoted disrespect. But the Republicans would batter him for showing that respect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
27. This is shit
I thought Obama taught Constitutional Law? Now I know why he didn't change the rug in the oval office. He's hiding all the shit Bush/Cheney swept under it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
28. Uh...Damn K&R
How...neat.


Damn

"Some experts on the military commissions said such a proposal would raise new questions about the fairness of a system ..."

Ya think?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
30. Were the guilty pleas waterboarded too?
Edited on Sat Jun-06-09 06:35 AM by Xipe Totec
see? It works!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rschop Donating Member (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
31. re Obama Weighs Plan Allowing 9/11 Suspects to Plead Guilty
"The Obama administration is considering a change in the law for the military commissions at the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, that would clear the way for detainees facing the death penalty to plead guilty without a full trial."

OH MY GOD!!!!!!!

Any and all contact with KSM has been limited to only the CIA, the military and the Red Cross which was sworn to absolute secrecy. KSM in court is always held behind sound proof glass, and anything KSM says in court is run through an electronic delay and can be turned off immediately if he said anything that would jeopardize what is now called our "national security".

So exactly what is it that he could say that would be so dangerous to the national security of the US, 7 1/2 years after the attacks on 9/11?

What is it that the US government is so afraid of that he might say that they are now figuring out a way to put him to death with no trial, no further testimony from him ever, nothing, so whatever he knows is never revealed to the American people and is kept hidden forever.

I challenge anyone to guess what exactly this information is.

One great big humongous hint.

Was this the same information that Sandy Berger was stealing from of the US National archives, in fact stuffing right down his pants, just before he was to testify before the 9/11 Commission?

What was the information that was in these archives that was so horrendous Berger would literally major commit numerous felonies, that would send him to US federal prison for years, to make sure that this information was never exposed to the American public by the 9/11 Commission.

Is this the same information that the US government now wants KSM to take to the grave so it will never ever be exposed?

Think about it!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rschop Donating Member (493 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
32. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-06-09 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
34. A guilty plea obtained from people who have been tortured is no more valid than a confession
obtained as a result of torture.

This is so disheartening.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC