Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gingrich backs off 'racist' label for Sotomayor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Old Coot Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:02 PM
Original message
Gingrich backs off 'racist' label for Sotomayor
Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON – Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Wednesday he shouldn't have called Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor a racist, but said he was still concerned that she would bring bias to her decisions.

In a letter to supporters, the Georgia Republican said that his words had been "perhaps too strong and direct" last week when he called Sotomayor a reverse "racist," based on a 2001 speech in which she said she hoped the rulings of a "wise Latina" would be better than those of a white male without similar experiences. Gingrich's remarks created a furor among Sotomayor's backers and caused problems for GOP figures who have been pushing to bring more diversity to the party.

Gingrich conceded that Sotomayor's rulings have "shown more caution and moderation" than her speeches and writings, but he said the 2001 comments "reveal a betrayal of a fundamental principle of the American system — that everyone is equal before the law."

Sotomayor, 54, would be the first Hispanic and the third woman to serve on the high court.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090603/ap_on_go_su_co/us_sotomayor_supreme_court
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Limbaugh also seems to be backing off, in his own begrudging way.
It's interesting that they're both doing so at the same time. I think this is strong evidence that they both get orders from the same source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Limbaugh is?
I don't think so. He's as adamant as ever that he's the only one not apologizing, and others are afraid to speak up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. He has said
Edited on Wed Jun-03-09 04:54 PM by drm604
that since she is Catholic, she may be pro-life so she may not be such a bad choice after all. I'm paraphrasing since I don't recall the exact quote but they played it on MSNBC.

On edit: Here it is. You have to watch the entire thing since it's towards the end.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPdAMeQqS-A

It's like he's begrudgingly trying to find a way to possibly support her. That's what makes me think that he and Gingrich may have been told to ease off by somebody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I'd believe the devil before I'd believe him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Exactly.
Why is he going out of his way to begrudgingly say something that he considers positive about Sotomayor? If you believe, like I do, that most, if not all, that he says is dictated by his paymasters, then it's easy to conclude that he and others are being told to back off at least a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dog forbid we have a bias on the court that is not white and male. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, good thing there is no bias on the court now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Whew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. well stated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Now, the WH needs to come out and say if Newt can misspeak so can she...
why is it different for her than it is for them...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Damage( if there was any) is done. A little late, don't you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Not only too late
but if that is backing off then I'm Mother Teresa. Typical GOPer non-apology apology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I guess those internal GOP polls on this were pretty horrifying. It is the only explanation for
this. You know Gingrich would not be backing off if this had been playing well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. I think Leahy is getting the word out...
He has threatened several times that if the 'leaders' of the Repub party continue to slander Sotomayor, he will be force to start the confirmations hearing at the earliest possible moment because that is the only venue she has to defend herself. She obviously has been told not to speak to the press right now, so he knows the Repubs are taking advantage of her silence to get all these cheap shots in while she cannot respond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Not likely...
More likely that they are convinced that Sotomayor is going to overturn Roe vs. Wade which is a very distinct possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ed Schultz said that Newt's approval rating is 6%.
Seems that people don't like assholes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. OK, who voted 6 times?
Come clean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. backpedaling is always amusing to watch...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. All part of procedure. Throw out the "she's a racist". Get it out there and back off later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. Great. Let's hope this signals the end of this bullshit.
I heard this story going around, and I thought, "Oh, not that bullshit again. Well, it's a new world out there, so let them give their old crap a try and see how far they get with it." And the answer is: not very far!

So, apparently pulling the "unfair to straight white men" card is no longer as politically effective as it used to be. Hooray! Good luck learning some new tricks, you very very very old dogs!

I like this new world,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. Oh jeez. "I was too strong" "I was too direct"
That's quite an apology, Newt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. Too late! Hispanics will remember how you referred to her! Bye bye Texas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. if he runs for presidents he will not get the latino or hispanic vote for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. Too late, you fucking asshole - you've already shown your true racist colors
Every one of these asshole GOP idiots who knee-jerk opposed Sotomayor have only further exposed themselves for the racist misogynists they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. Nice try, fatso, but the videos remain
can't wait until you and Miss Dumbass Alaska run against Obama in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-03-09 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
25. Somebody must have sent them a memo ~
Don't know who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-04-09 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. it wouldn't surprise me if the GOP did some internal polling
and found out the issue is hurting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC