Accusers discuss Schwarzenegger claims

[JoFerret]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-3802125,00.html

Harwell said she does not regret coming forward but had hoped that discussing Schwarzenegger's behavior would trigger a public discussion about sexual harassment. Now she fears that is not happening.

Schwarzenegger said during the election he would deal with the allegations against him after the election, but later dismissed them as ``old news'' and announced he would not appoint an investigator to look into the claims.

[LiberalFighter]

1. They should had come out earlier with the charges...

when his career was not as solid. That would had put him off his track.

[rwheeler31]

2. Why not take it to the courts?

nt

[lcordero]

5. because not everybody can AFFORD lawyers

[Webster Green]

6. Lots of lawyers would jump at the chance to nail the gropinater

If the women want to press charges.

[LiberalFighter]

7. Depends on what the statute of limitations are for the place.

[mountainvue]

3. I would think

that this would be a good case for any or all of them to take to the EEOC.

[goclark]

4. Bring It On!

Arnold is a molester and should be taken to court!
Do you think for one minute the Repubs would have let Clinton remain in office without badgering him daily as they did for years?

If I recall, these women were not bimbos like Gennifer Flowers, these were co workers and every day folks.

I say take it to court and keep the heat on. He should be punished for his deeds. Why are we allowing him to walk around like some Well Dress Turkey on steroids?

So many Californian believe that he is bipartisan. Don't believe it for one minute. He is tightly rapped into GW's little hands. Hummmmm,he may even be groping good ole George.

[JohnOneillsMemory]

8. Every gay marriage story should mention his molestation charges. n/t