Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Greenpeace demands (legal) advice on Iraq war (UK)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Monkey see Monkey Do Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 08:51 AM
Original message
Greenpeace demands (legal) advice on Iraq war (UK)
The Government was facing fresh demands to release the Attorney-General's advice on the legality of the war in Iraq.

On Wednesday the trial of the former intelligence officer turned whistleblower Katharine Gun was dropped after her lawyers asked to see the advice.

Now the environmental group Greenpeace is demanding access to Lord Goldsmith's advice to ministers so it can defend 14 activists in court following an anti-war protest last year.

http://icscotland.icnetwork.co.uk/news/uk/today/content_objectid=13998274_method=full_siteid=50141_headline=-Greenpeace-demands-advice-on-Iraq-war-name_page.html

see also Clare Short's (front page) column in today's Independent:

Clare Short: Was Attorney General leant on to sanction war?

The suggestion, however, that the Attorney General's opinion may have been manipulated is very serious. There is no doubt that the way in which a truncated opinion authorising war appeared at the very last minute was very odd. Foreign Office lawyers disagreed on the legality of war. Senior officials in Whitehall worried that they were being asked to prepare for illegal action. I was informed that the military would not move without the Attorney General's authorisation. Then on the day Robin Cook resigned, the Attorney General came to the Cabinet, sat in Robin's seat and circulated two sides of A4 which said that successive UN resolutions provided legal authority for war. I tried to ask why he was so late and if there was any doubt but was told in no uncertain terms there was to be no discussion. No other advice was made available across Whitehall.

As I go over and over events leading up to the rush to war, I cannot help but conclude that the way in which the Attorney General's opinion was produced and handled was very strange. It is hard not to suspect that he had doubts and was leant upon.

http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=495919

& also:

I quit because the war against Iraq was illegal, says former government lawyer

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=495970
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course the AG simply made it up.
Serious experts knew this at the time. It's taken a year for the world to catch up, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC