Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dick Durbin would accept Gitmo detainees in Illinois if in 'supermax' prison

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
BlueJessamine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 09:46 AM
Original message
Dick Durbin would accept Gitmo detainees in Illinois if in 'supermax' prison
Source: Politico

Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), the assistant majority leader, said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that he would accept Guantanamo detainees in his home state as long as they were held in super-maximum prisons, where inmates are held 23 hours a day in small cells with slits for windows.

Moderator David Gregory asked: “Would you be OK with al Qaeda prisoners – those currently at Guantanamo Bay – in a prison in Illinois?”

Durbin responded: “Well, I’d be OK with it in a supermax facility, because we’ve never had an escape from one.”


snip

—On former Vice President Cheney’s speech: “I know what Vice President Cheney said. If you want an insight into his analysis of intelligence and national security, you should always remember four words: ‘weapons of mass destruction.’ That was a bogus fear tactic used by Vice President Cheney years ago, which led us into a war that has cost us 4, 284 American lives, we should recall on this Memorial Day weekend.”







Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22900.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. They're just prisoners
I don't know why some people are so scared about sending these prisoners to a US prison. Sen. Levin said he would be ok with opening a prison in Upper Michigan. I would have no worries about these prisoners being in my state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. The Republicans are blowing a racist dog whistle on this one.
It's SO SAD watching all the drool...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. How can a whistle be racist?
It is an inanimate object.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Forgive me. "...a racist's dog whistle." Details, details, details...
As if nuance were an Ami strength... :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Whatever you say, English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why would we continue to hold people with no charges of any kind, no chance
for a trial, and no legal basis for holding them at all?

Calling them detainees makes it sound like they've had to miss lunch at school.

Release them now and send them home.

Or file charges and try them in a regular court of law.

It's not complicated: it's simple. What's complicated is explaining away the American gulag system....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chatnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Thank you
I don't know how this isn't constantly brought up.

We have illegally been holding these ppl for years without charging them. How is there not international pressure on this administration to release them?

And how can this administration possibly attempt to justify not releasing these people OR filing charges immediately? They can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whiptail Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. cheneys constant fearmongering
these men are not supermen...just a buncha p.o.w.s and cheneys constant barrage of bullshit makes me want to put HIM in supermax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJessamine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Montana mayor says his town will take 100 Gitmo prisoners
http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/15695/

excerpt:

Earlier this month, under the radar of most of the nation’s media, Hardin’s town council voted unanimously to request that the U.S. government send the detainees there.

The detainees “have to go somewhere,” Adams said, and “although I don’t have the power to make the final decision, we have the room and the facilities here to house them.”

Asked whether people in his town had concerns about taking in people whom Cheney and Bush have repeatedly described as “dangerous” and “the worst of the worst,” the mayor replied:

“First of all, there are lots of tough criminals in America who have committed horrible crimes and we have them housed in towns all across this country. With all those feds that will come in here along with the Guantanamo detainees, we’ll have a lot more law enforcement around here than we have now. We need everything we can get, what with the high cost of law enforcement these days.”

He noted that Hardin, “like other towns, is hard hit by the economic crisis. People don’t want to hear scare stories about how dangerous the terrorists are. They’ve heard all that and they know all that. What we need is some help to get us through these hard times and we believe that there will be at least 100 new jobs created if they come here. This would be a boost to any small town suffering in this economy.”

Other right-wing Republicans have, of course, joined the Cheney bandwagon against the closing of Guantanamo. Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) said in an appearance on MSNBC this morning that “no community in the U.S. would welcome terrorists, would-be terrorists, former terrorists or any kind of terrorists from Guantanamo, not even into its courthouses for a trial.”

Soon after Shelby made that claim, Rep. Jim Moran (D-Va.) issued a statement repeating his assertion that the detainees could be tried in his Alexandria, Va., district.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wouldn't just a "maximum security" prison do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hangman86 Donating Member (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. BUT GUYS GUYS! Rememeber that episode of "24"
where the terrorist being held in a maximum security prison was able to break out with the help of the Secretary of State, and then a nuclear bomb went off, and then a virus was released, and then Jack tortured a guy and everything was okay for a while, yeah that was cool, torture makes me hard, but wait then Jack got stabbed in the back and got tied up while a terrorist was launching a missile and if it wasn't for the terrorist saying something bad about Brooke Sheilds causing Jack to break through the ropes and head butt the guy, we might all be DEAD! Because 24 is so realistic you know. Do we really want to risk this happening? What if the terrorists we bring over here like Brooke Shields! :sarcasm:

Whew! I call that piece, "Ramblings of a Frightened Neo-Con."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Heh heh. Brooke Shields is kewl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good for Sen. Durbin. Repukes have programmed the populace to have knee jerk reaction like Pavlov's
dogs. Terrorist = FEAR!!!1!

And they are still using it every chance they get.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. There's a whole lot of people out there who need some
major counseling. For some reason they have chosen to wallow in 911 and just can not get past it.

The best speech President Obama could give would be to remind people we are Americans. That we have fought for our way of life and won great battles without paralyzing fear. It's time for everyone to get up on their feet and throw away the knee pads. We will not be defeated and mocked by these fools by giving them the satisfaction of cowering before them. We will bring them here not only because we are a moral and compassionate people who believe in the rule of law, but because we are not going to let them defeat us by responding just as they wish to their efforts to make us afraid.

That speech, although he would likely do it much more eloquently, would put a stake through the heart of any effort to use fear mongering. But alas it has not yet happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. How many "spare beds" does the state have available?
I thought they were all full up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. There is an entire prison in Thompson, IL that is empty.
It was never opened. The place is new. It is a maximum security prison.

The people there revamped the town's water system, too.

They are starved for jobs and tired of empty promises.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Room for how many?
Have you mentioned this to Obama, your representatives in Congress, and your media. No use saying they already know. Clearly, they know nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. do`t give them any ideas--i think the capacity is 600
it would be a good place to hold some of these guys
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is just silly

First, I'm not aware they've been charged with anything.

Second, super-max prisons are for those are deemed an extreme menace to society if released, such as to individuals, not those who collaborate (if that even happened) to create dangerous scenarios. They're super-max because the inmates themselves are dangerous to handle. That's not the case here.

Frankly, a medium-security prison might be fine, although I don't think you could get away with anything less than a high-security prison in this political climate, but the Republicans are just fear-mongering. I mean, what sort of (probably now) 18-year-old belongs in a super-max? He'd have to be one hell of a dangerous criminal to justify that.

I'm not saying that if they did something they shouldn't be incarcerated, but first lets hold a trial and then, if justified, put them in a high-security prison. I'm sure there's a handful in the group that probably needs high-security, but I get the impression that most shouldn't be there at all or, if they should be, it won't be on a par with, say, Hannibal Lecter or Jeffrey Dahmer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. Will he also be hiding under his bed?
What an ass. So scared of people who haven't come to trial. He should be scared. One day the same standard of "justice" may be applied to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
19. If those Gitmo detainees claim to be at war with the United States...
...I say treat them like POW's--keep'em in Supermax, deprogram them, and release them once they're regarded as no longer dangerous to themselves or the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Nearly all of those repatriated have been immediately released.
The Junta knows that the problem is that it held these people for years when it had nothing on almost all of them.

But the Khmer Rouge would be proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. are terrorist suspects worse than child molestors, rapists, murderers etc ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. Well, where he'd think they were going to be? Flipping burgers at Steak 'n' Shake? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
23. Land of the brave my ass
this country is scared of its shadow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Agreed!
I doubt there has ever been a people anytime in history as easy to scare as the current generation of Americans.

- B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-24-09 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
25. Why should they be held in such conditions
if they are not charged for anything?

It is better to build a brand new facility, in the middle of nowhere which would house only them, no other prisoners.

How can we possible treat individuals who were not charged for anything, in such a manner? What will we gain by moving them from Gitmo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
27. Federal "Super Max"
a.k.a. "Administrative Maximum Security" prisons are populated by extremely high profile criminals like Unibomber, Nichols, and others, but they are mostly populated by "disruptive group" (Aryan Brotherhood, Crips, Mexican Mafia, Dirty White Boys, etc.) leaders to limit their communication with each other and the rank and file in their groups. There may be merit in keeping some of these "detainees" in this type of facility to keep communication with each other and those outside to a minimum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC