Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court justice examines a disputed presidential election _ from 187

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 03:29 AM
Original message
Supreme Court justice examines a disputed presidential election _ from 187
Supreme Court justice examines a disputed presidential election _ from 1876

ANNE GEARAN, Associated Press Writer
Thursday, February 26, 2004


(02-26) 22:45 PST WASHINGTON (AP) --

With a presidency in the balance, Supreme Court justices stepped in to help decide the outcome of a messy election. Sound familiar?

Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist should know, but his new book isn't about the disputed 2000 election he helped call for Republican George W. Bush. It's a historical account of the election of 1876, which also involved electoral deadlock and voting problems in Florida.

The parallels aren't lost on Rehnquist.

"There was profound dissatisfaction with the process on the part of the losing parties in both 2000 and 1876," Rehnquist writes in the introduction to his latest book, due in stores next month.
(snip/...)

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/02/26/national0145EST0417.DTL



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Awww, he's trying to justify his treason.
Isn't that sweet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hope the twisted fucker roasts in hell for eternity.
Traitorous bastard. The real crime is that we let these people live after defiling our democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSchreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. The difference between 1876 and 2000
Is that, in 1876, Congress made the decision, as the Constitution states. OTOH, in 2000, the SCOTUS made it, and Congress abdicated its power.

Martin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorgatron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. so he wants to tell his side of the story?
so what,he'll still go down in history as criminal scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Amen
You are absolutely right on ! And in 200 No one would even sup;port the Black Caucus Protest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annagull Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Gee Rehnquist, ya think?
"There was profound dissatisfaction with the process on the part of the losing parties in both 2000 and 1876," Rehnquist writes in the introduction to his latest book, due in stores next month.
(snip/...)

Profound dissatisfaction doesn't even begin to describe what you clowns did..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. He actually has the
nerve to bring this up and try and justify it. VERY ironic will another election coming up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. Amen!
Subject: Amen
Message:
You are absolutely right on ! And in 200 No one would even sup;port the Black Caucus Protest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC