Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NRA, Mayors Agree on Gun Change

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:42 AM
Original message
NRA, Mayors Agree on Gun Change
Source: NBC/DFW News

The National Rifle Association and big-city mayors have rarely agreed on gun laws. But they’ve found something they may both support: the Obama administration’s call for full law-enforcement access to data from traces of guns used in crimes.

The rare, and somewhat vague, consensus between the NRA and the mayors appears likely to increase the chances that Congress will pass the reform

The administration is proposing a partial rollback of a 2003 amendment named for Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.). Under the changes, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives would be able to share gun-tracing information with federal, state and local law enforcement agencies, and prosecutors would be privy to the information.

Supporters say the change would help law enforcement target the source of guns used in crimes and would help prevent illegal drug trafficking.

-----

Christopher Cox, an NRA spokesman, stopped shy of endorsing the reform but did not oppose it: “While we do not believe any change is necessary, we appreciate the President’s decision to support law enforcement and not gun control activists.”

Read more: http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/us_world/NRA__mayors_agree_on_gun_change.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jeepnstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Reasonable.
Reasonable is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Subject to misinterpretation because NRA said "President’s decision to support law enforcement and
not gun control activists.”

IMO all credible pro-RKBA groups call for government to aggressively enforce existing laws, something that has not and is not happening.

In fact, one California country says it will no longer prosecute certain crimes so a citizen is wasting her/his time by calling 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. How, exactly, is that subject to misinterpretation?
The regulation in question tracks weapons used in crimes across state lines, to find the source of weapons used in crimes.

What does that have to do with "In fact, one California country says it will no longer prosecute certain crimes so a citizen is wasting her/his time by calling 911."?

Abso-fucking-lutely NOTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Apparently you can't understand the OP subject "NRA, Mayors Agree on Gun Change" and the last quote,
"we appreciate the President’s decision to support law enforcement and not gun control activists.” That's a qualified approval and a far cry from "NRA, Mayors Agree" in the article title.

The NRA statement re "support law enforcement" is precisely relevant to my statement about "aggressively enforce existing laws".

I'm so sorry you have difficulty comprehending what you read.

Have a nice day, :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. It is not I who is lacking in reading comprehension.
"But they’ve found something they may both support: the Obama administration’s call for full law-enforcement access to data from traces of guns used in crimes."

THAT is what the article is about - it is what the mayors and NRA are in agreement on. The article makes no mention whatsoever about other law enforcement issues.

In fact, the final sentence there is a snark by the NRA spokesman:

Christopher Cox, an NRA spokesman, stopped shy of endorsing the reform but did not oppose it: “While we do not believe any change is necessary, we appreciate the President’s decision to support law enforcement and not gun control activists.”

It is commenting on the widely held, NRA encouraged, erroneous contention that Obama is out to take peoples' guns away at the behest of gun control advocates. Even as he agrees with Obama, Cox couldn't resist being pissy.

But that's OK - I know how at a loss you all feel without your strawmen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I won't confuse you with facts because your mind is made up. I've observed that's a terminal illness
with many who would prohibit pre-existing, inalienable/unalienable rights that government is obligated to protect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. you mean like the lady who called 911 on Burger King because...
they wouldn't supersize her fries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No, misdemeanors such as assaults, thefts and burglaries, see DU threads below.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bagrman Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. They need to enforce the laws that they have already on the books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. While I think we need more control, enforcing the current laws is CRITICAL!
I agree with the NRA on that point. There are a wealth of laws that aren't being enforced to the extent that they should be. This seems like a very reasonable step.

That said, I almost break down in teary-laughter when I hear or read an argument for AK-47's as a hunting weapon. If you can't hit the side of a barn door with a shotgun, you DO NOT BELONG IN THE WOODS WITH A GUN! Who would want to eat something that has 158 rounds embedded in it? There was an old Bloom County on that subject - "I found a hoof!"






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. What does hunting have to do with the right to own a firearm?
Beyond that though, my AR-15 has made an excellent hunting rifle since I purchased it last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Nothing at all - that's what makes it funny.
I just laugh when someone justifies assault weapons based on their hunting needs - that isn't hunting, that's carpet bombing!

The 2nd Amendment is pretty clear in its intent, but we do have restrictions on weapons - you can't buy a grenade launcher at Dick's Sporting Goods. There are common sense boundaries to that - and I do own guns.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Define assault weapon. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blandocyte Donating Member (830 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Gun.
Next! We need to label whichever of them anything we can that will help get some off the streets. Less availability means fewer deaths. There's way too many guns out there. Hopefully using the tracking info will lead to arrest of less-than-legal suppliers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. You seem to be under the mistaken idea..
.. that assault weapons fire any faster than other semi-automatic hunting rifles- as fast or slow as you pull the trigger. Most states require that any gun used in hunting be equipped with a five round magazine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Semi-auto AK-47 clones make great hunting rifles.
Matched with the right game, they have ballistics similar to a .30-30 and are subject to the same 5-round magazine restrictions as every other rifle is in the states that restrict hunting mag sizes (almost all of them). What is the problem with using an AK-47 for hunting? Is it just a problem of ergonomic vs traditional stock shapes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. No fishing in NICS, thank you.
If a gun is recovered as part of an investigation, law enforcement is already able to trace that gun to its source. What the tiahrt amendment does is disallow queries like 'who / how many in this zip code have purchased a firearm?' or 'which FFLs are selling the most guns?' - activities that in and of themselves are not indicative of criminal activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. The article specifically says a "partial rollback" -
and that part concerns sharing information with the ATF and federal law enforcement - currently several states use the Tiahrt amendment to NOT share ANY information with the feds.

Fishing expeditions are still disallowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Let's hope so..
I'd like to see a more exhaustive article on what will / will not be allowed.

The reason for the Tiahrt amendment in part, came about as a direct result of Charles Schumer's 'report' on assault weapons that tried to assert that assault weapons were used in a disproportionate amount of crime based on trace requests- when in actuality, 1) assault weapons were traced more often than other guns because they were unusual, and firearms are traced for non-criminal purposes too (ie, part of a gun buyback, etc.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. Any OP that uses "gun" draws posts written by those who are grossly ignorant of the inalienable
right to keep and bear arms for self-defense as proved by repeating mis-truths such as semiautomatic firearms mislabeled assault weapons, private sale of personal property mislabeled gun-show sale, and hunting as a 2nd amendment issue when the 2nd protects the right of self-defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Hey Jody, The Obama-Trashing Has Dropped A Notch Down In The Gungeon.
Better go take care of that.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Your side is in a far better position to facilitate such a thing, Paladin.
Just get Obama to carry water for the republican founded, republican led brady bunch, and I'm sure things will be back to normal.


Everyone hereabouts knows thats what you'd like to see him to do.


And we all know you'd smile if he did.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Hey Paladin, have a great day. Your thoughtful commentary is always refreshing to hear.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC