Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New York Fed Chairman Stephen Friedman resigns

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 07:05 PM
Original message
New York Fed Chairman Stephen Friedman resigns
Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- Stephen Friedman, chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's board of directors, has resigned effectively immediately.

Friedman was the subject of a recent Wall Street Journal story that raised questions about his ties to Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

Goldman Sachs late last year received quick Fed approval to become a bank holding company. During that time, Friedman sat on Goldman's board and had a large holding in the company, a violation of Fed policy, the Journal reported.

But the New York Fed's executive vice president and general counsel Thomas Baxter says Friedman's purchases of Goldman Sachs stock in December 2008 and January 2009 "did not violate any Federal Reserve statute, rule or policy."

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-fed8-2009may08,0,7796328.story?track=rss



text of letter of resignation here:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/New-York-Fed-chair-Stephen-cnnm-15176185.html?.v=3

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. wonder what job he'll jump into now that his work is done

I can only imagine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Probably the next CEO of GM,or Chrysler
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. take your pick
the entire corporate world is one big incestuous family
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Curator of the Bush Library?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does the word ethics ever come into play any more?
But the New York Fed's executive vice president and general counsel Thomas Baxter says Friedman's purchases of Goldman Sachs stock in December 2008 and January 2009 "did not violate any Federal Reserve statute, rule or policy."
___________________________________________________________________

What about ethics? Conflicts-of-interest? Betraying the public trust?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Friedman was the subject of a recent Wall Street Journal story that raised questions..."
Edited on Thu May-07-09 07:54 PM by FailureToCommunicate
Wait. I though the Wall Street Journal was just a tool of the corporate elite and in bed with the oligarchs??!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Sometimes the oligarchs do hit jobs on each other.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. The WSJ's news division and their editorial dept.
are two completely different animals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Didn't Rupert Murdoch buy the WSJ, recently? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Yes, but so far he has kept the good reporters for whom people actually read the paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. I should have put "sarcasm" on my post. I do know the Journal's split personality
I know intimately, 'cause my brother was one of The Journal's best investigative reporters. Unfortunately for The Journal and for all who value hard hitting, accurate journalism my brother just died last Friday
from cancer. His type of fair but unflinching muckraking will be sorely missed.

Here is a link to some of his stories over the past while:
http://online.wsj.com/public/page/johnwilke.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. This story was on DU a while ago, written by SPitzer, I think. So it was already out in
the open before the Wall Street Journal wrote it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. The DU piece was two days ago and Spitzer credits the Journal with the reporting. nt
Edited on Fri May-08-09 08:56 AM by FailureToCommunicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. oops. I stand corrected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. but didn't WSJ get the story from a blogger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Beats me. But good reporters protect their sources, or they dry up and blow away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. 5 bucks says he gets a job before a friend of mine does
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. That's the problem. He already had two jobs. One at Goldman and one working for the Fed

He is keeping his board position at Goldman while giving up the Fed Reserve job.

The work he did at the Fed Reserve makes his position at Goldman much more lucrative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. His resignation letter states the Fed gave him a waiver to keep on the job

So everyone at the Fed knew there is a huge conflict of interest otherwise why issue a waiver?


But now that he has been caught he says he is leaving because it his ties to Goldman is a "distraction". No sir. It is not a distraction, it is illegal. Waiver or no waiver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I think Goldman should return our moeny, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well well well. "Exhibit A. " To the GP
Here's an understatement...

"In recent days, Friedman's dual role has become Exhibit A for what critics perceive as a too-cozy relationship between the New York Fed, which serves as the central bank's eyes and ears on Wall Street, and the bankers it oversees."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/07/AR2009050704276.html?hpid=sec-business
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sansf Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. Financier incest
Read the piece on Slate: http://www.slate.com/id/2217811/

Up until now I gave Obama a short pass on his econ picks. By now he has to know how embedded they all are in their goal of keeping this heist going.

I know Cuomo is working on it, but I am very depressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. I just tried to find this guy's wiki and I couldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Here's his Muckety map
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-08-09 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. What's the point? It's not as if Goldman's going to run out of people to replace him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC