Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Confusion at the Canyon: Administration Engaging in the Same Potentially Illegal Action as Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 02:23 PM
Original message
Confusion at the Canyon: Administration Engaging in the Same Potentially Illegal Action as Bush
Source: AScribe

Wed May 6 11:52:52 2009 Pacific Time

Confusion at the Canyon: Administration Engaging in the Same Potentially Illegal Action as Bush

WASHINGTON, May 6 (AScribe Newswire) -- The U.S. Department of the Interior last week authorized mining for uranium on federal land near Grand Canyon National Park in an apparent violation of a Congressional resolution passed last June that declared more than 1 million acres around the Park off-limits to new mining activity.

Documents from the department's Bureau of Land Management (BLM) obtained by the Grand Canyon Trust show that on April 27, BLM listed as "Operations authorized" applications for exploratory drilling by a mining company known as Quaterra Alaska.

~snip~
Without decisive action by the Obama administration to halt mining activities near the Grand Canyon, the Interior department's rubber- stamping of Quaterra's application could trigger a dramatic increase in mining in close proximity to pristine national park lands and the precious Colorado River, which supplies drinking water to 25 million Americans

"We were surprised to see that BLM appears to have approved drilling operations near the Canyon in violation of Congressional action," said Dusty Horwitt, senior analyst at Environmental Working Group. "Secretary Salazar should act today to put these lands off-limits to mining activity to protect the Canyon and the Colorado River."


Read more: http://www.ascribe.org/cgi-bin/behold.pl?ascribeid=20090506.113923&time=11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Salazar is busy un-endangering Endangered Species
Edited on Wed May-06-09 02:47 PM by truedelphi
Such that a wolf species will be extinct in ten months.

That's important work ya know.

Cannot interfere with that important job.

Gotta allow species to be eliminated. No time to enforce pesky rules anbout mining on acreage that Congress declared sacred.

It's a matter of priorities. Who cares if some pesky rule is being followed or not? No one at Treasury or the Fed is following any pesky rules - those were all eliminated and stayed by Bush, and were such great deregulation actions that the pesky rules have remained eliminated! "No regulation" is the hallmark of a free society, ya know.

<Do I need the sarcasm icon, or are we clear?>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdlh8894 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Gotta allow species to be eliminated
Evolution anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellabella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Man's activities have altered the evolutionary process.
For instance, there are more people now with poor sight because we have eye doctors and corrective lenses. Those people would not have survived thousands of years ago, but technology has changed that.

I understand that 99% of all species every alive on earth are extinct, but pollution, overhunting, and habitat loss due to development aren't evolution. If a species is in danger of becoming extinct because of our activity, we need to do whatever we can to fix it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Very much ageed - I am living in a rural area that is quickly being converted
From gorgeous forested areas and little private family dairy farms to massive vineyards.
This activity causes a loss of 15% to the deer population each year. Simply no habitat.

And when the deer go, so do the badgers, skunks, rabbits, coons, snakes, frogs, birds,
and coyotes and foxes. It is really heart breaking. The new vineyard owners do not even plant hedge rows or have brush separating say seventy five sq acres from the next seventy five acres. Instead, you can actually find areas that are one mile by one mile of nothing but grape vines. So heavily pesticided that you rarely even see a single bird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellabella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. It's really sad. And most people don't realize that human beings are
affected too. That's the whole point of the environmental movement. It isn't just to 'save some birds'. Whatever kills off other species is going to kill us too, just more slowly. Perhaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I have already been contacted by someone who
Told me that a former friend of theirs, a woman lawyer, was hired by the County to look into whether the pesticides from the vineyards are going into the creeks and then into Clear Lake.

Supposedly this lawyer has been bought and paid for. It means that our drinking water will not be useable in the near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Hopefully, Salazar will quickly learn how screwed up is Interior.
I suspect its the MOST ABYSMALLY MESSED UP agency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why did Obama choose so many losers for his Cabinet? I am disgusted with Obama on many
Edited on Wed May-06-09 03:43 PM by MasonJar
fronts, and he is our only hope right now. He chose that Westerner Salazar to lead the Interior. Anyone should know how the West feels about animals and the environment. Salazar, and by extension Obama, has taken the Yellowstone and Rocky Mt. wolves off the endangered species list, an action even the environmental nightmare GWB never did (even though, according to Salazar's spokesman at Interior who answered when I called to blow carbon dioxide fumes on them, the wolves allegedly recovered in 2002) and yet it only took the O administration 3 months to reverse the protection. They are also not standing firm on wild horses and burros. Hence I am hardly surprised that they are not leading the charge to reverse this Grand Canyon debacle. It seems Obama is too busy going forward to investigate/prosecute Bush/Cheney, but he is not too busy to continue their policies in the most officious ways. It appears that selecting Geithner and Salazar and several others was purposeful and in line with Obama's own policy direction. That is the answer I guess to my original question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "Anyone should know how the West feels about animals and the environment."
Haven't spent much time in Colorado, have you? You can't walk ten feet without bumping into a conservationist in some parts of Colorado.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Is that a problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Of course not.
Edited on Wed May-06-09 07:59 PM by TwilightZone
Did you read the post I replied to? My objection was to the ridiculous stereotyping contained within.

Or do you agree that those nasty "Westerners" don't care about the environment? What a crock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Great post. I entirely agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-06-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. so apparently environmental issues never really were important to Obama
I mean--Salazar?

thanks for nothing. the only "change" is fewer species in the world than when bush left office, and not because of any natural process of evolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Badgerman Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-07-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
14. radioactive debris in the Colorado river is okay, if it creates jobs and votes! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC