Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Norm) Coleman: 'I think the law is on our side'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 09:53 AM
Original message
(Norm) Coleman: 'I think the law is on our side'
Source: Star Tribune

Norm Coleman says his fight is for more than a U.S. Senate seat, it's for a constitutional principle.

Norm Coleman is hitting a different kind of campaign trail this week.

The former Republican senator is using a media blitz to convince Minnesotans weary of the recount process and frustrated that they are still a senator short that he has good reason to appeal Democrat Al Franken's victory in the U.S. Senate election trial.

And if the Minnesota Supreme Court sees it his way, he said, he thinks he can win.

"I'm hopeful. I think the law is on our side," he said.

Read more: http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/senate/43113327.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUnciaec8O7EyUsl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlphaCentauri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Non compos mentis
would be the ruling if the average person had these kind of delusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWorldJohn Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. Translation - These words signify not of sound mind, memory, or understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, why not?
It worked for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. This just shows that Coleman lacks the necessary judgment to be a Senator n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Norm Coleman is a fucking weasel.
It is surprising that this election was so close; who could vote for this douchebag?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democracyinkind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. Under your definition of "law" sure, Norm, but that's not the law we subscribe to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayMusgrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. These Rethuglicans think the law is whatever they
want it to be.

I agree, he does not have the mentality to serve as a Senator. He's in his own little self serving world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. His argument::
Absentee ballots that were counted in one place, despite flaws such as missing signatures or unregistered witnesses -- such as in Minneapolis -- were tossed out under the stricter standards used in another place -- for instance, Carver County.

Why were the flawed ballots counted in the first place? So Norm is for flawed elections..lol that makes sense. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demoborn47 Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. F U N C eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. Norm's real assignment
Edited on Fri Apr-17-09 10:17 AM by get the red out
Am I alone in wondering if Norm's real assignment here is to delay the seating of one more Democratic Senator as long as possible, to try to stall certain legislation from the Obama administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. You are not alone. Of course it is!
Edited on Fri Apr-17-09 11:13 AM by AlbertCat
Someone who truly knows he is in the right on matters of this kind does not go public with "I think....".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
24. Please. Is there anyone who doubts that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. No question that's what this is about. If it weren't for that the GOP
wouldn't be supporting Norm at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well Normie, the LAW says the candidate with the most votes wins.
So,what you think really does not matter, does it now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. norm Isn't Well
Let's start a "whisper" campaign.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. yea
and I think I'm hung like john holmes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antimatter98 Donating Member (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. Repubs switch the Constituition off and on depending on what they want. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. What a joke
The win is Al Franken's. No changing the rules after the fact. Norm's continued legal battles are for the GOP and his own warped reality and not out of some desire to truly improve the absentee balloting system. If he cared this much about the issue he would not risk it at bringing it up in a sideshow to simply block a Democrat from entering the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
16. Please Norm
Hold Your Breath!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
17. Hump? What hump?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. Pipe Dreams are under the bed NORM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Norm has to sneak this by the Minnesota Supremes...
so that he can get his case heard by the SCOTUS who will cite Bush v Gore so that Norm can win. Simple.

See, the Supremes don't have to count the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 03:01 PM
Original message
If SCOTUS uses Bush vs Gore as a precedent in this election after affirming in writing
that Bush vs Gore should NEVER be used as a precedent, then we can bag them for judicial misconduct. Throw the Felonious Five into prison where they belong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
36. If SCOTUS uses Bush vs Gore as a precedent in this election after affirming in writing
that Bush vs Gore should NEVER be used as a precedent, then we can bag them for judicial misconduct. Throw the Felonious Five into prison where they belong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gamey Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
21. What a loser!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
22. Fuck off, Norm.
Loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
23. Good ... He feels that way ... I really want him to get his hopes high before crashing

and burning..


and he can swim in self-pity.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
26. OK, Norm, you go ahead and think that.
Meanwhile, sanity is on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ardvark Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'm not a big fan of Al Frankin, but it's time for Republican leadership to step in and say
Edited on Fri Apr-17-09 12:51 PM by ardvark
'It's over, Norm, step aside'

Al Gore did it in dec 2000, senate isnt as important, but this has gone on a lot longer

Nixon did the right thing in 1960

Gore did the right thing in 2000

It's Coleman's turn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. What are you smokin'?
This current crop of GOP politicians do the right thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. Gore never gave up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blandocyte Donating Member (830 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. Yes, Norm, cry and tantrum like all repukes
and eventually you'll make peace with the idea that you lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
30. At Coleman's blog, at his website, NO comments have been left
Edited on Fri Apr-17-09 01:37 PM by Jefferson23
since Feb 16, and then only two.

And only 2 from Feb. 13th,
Norm,
This is GREAT new for the people of MN; as always "GO NORM GO"

Best Regards,
Claudia

and, Norm Go Away
Who is paying for all this? Not Norm. We should ship him off to Iraq and let him fight the war he helped start.

By: Bleed red.
http://www.colemanforsenate.com/blog-post/560/court%92s-decision-a-victory-for-3%2C500-minnesota-voters#blogcomments

ROFL

His economic support from Mitchell and the like has sustained him but I don't hear any cheerleaders from the local citizens.

edited to add link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomhayes Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
31. He has to say this or he'll have to Pay Al's bills
He's establishing a record that he "believes" in appealing this so he won't be forced to pay the bills of the contestee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
33. I'll have whatever drink Norm is having.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
34. what law would that be normie?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Murphy's Law?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
35. Think again, Norm
You've HAD your day in court. You lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
37. I guess the law says you have the right to appeal...
I don't know that it says you have the right to a Seanate seat.

Personally, Norm, I'd say you ought to start looking into Social Security law pretty soon. I sense a retirement in your immediate future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. A majority of the Minnesota SC Justices and of the SCOTUS Justices were appointed by RW'ers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC