Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Bankrupt' Forces may shut 5 bases

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodbarnett Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 10:07 AM
Original message
'Bankrupt' Forces may shut 5 bases
Canada's army, navy and air force are facing a funding shortfall of up to half a billion dollars, defence sources told the National Post, and the military is recommending drastic measures to make up the difference, including closing some of the largest bases in the country.

The federal government is stalling the release of internal documents that outline the looming financial crisis, but military sources said the reports indicate that in the fiscal year beginning on April 1, the air force expects to be $150-million short of funds needed to fulfill its commitments, the navy will be $150-million shy of its needs and the army will be as much as $200-million short.

<snip>

The military sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the reports foresee a situation so dire that they recommend curtailing operations, dry-docking ships and mothballing vehicles or aircraft and closing at least four Canadian Forces bases.

Unless additional funding is awarded by the government, the air force is suggesting closing bases at Goose Bay, Nfld., Bagotville, Que., North Bay and Winnipeg, the sources said.

<snip>

The navy predicts it will not be able to live up to treaty obligations to NATO and other alliances and cannot carry out enough patrols of Canadian waters to comply with agreements with other government departments such as Immigration Canada or Fisheries and Oceans.

http://www.canada.com/national/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=97f7dbbe-981a-4085-9686-e87fab611fbb

comment : can you spell "bail out:, wasn't there a recent report of Canada allowing USA strategic missle defense placements on Canadian soil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, It is nothing new. It's been about twenty years since the forces
were sustainable. Canada is long overdue for a debate on the future of the armed forces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Let Haliburton et al
pay. They are the ones getting the money.
Bailout, no more Social Security, Medicare, etc. exactly what the Repugs have always wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MacCovern Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. healthcare for everyone, but we won't defend ourselves!
Reading that story makes me wonder even more about universal health care.

The plan is to just let the United States defend them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hmmm.. just who do they need defending from? People like Canadians
Not like Americans who virtually every country in the world despises us. You don't need a huge Army to defend yourself if you have no enemies. America has lots and lots of enemies. So we buy bombs and bullets and let our people do without education and health care. :shrug: but we are soooooooo superior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, it's not like we share a border with any rogue states or anything.
Right? Right?;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-04 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. NATO treaty obligations and Dept. Fisheries and Oceans.
The navy predicts it will not be able to live up to treaty obligations to NATO and other alliances and cannot carry out enough patrols of Canadian waters to comply with agreements with other government departments such as Immigration Canada or Fisheries and Oceans.

But you are right, let someone else hold up Canada's end of those barains, you are too busy being soooooooo superior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC