Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Assertion on Tax Cuts Is at Odds With IRS Data

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 06:54 AM
Original message
Bush Assertion on Tax Cuts Is at Odds With IRS Data
By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 24, 2004; Page A04


President Bush defended his tax cuts yesterday as economic fuel for the small-business sector in response to mounting criticism from Democratic presidential candidates that the cuts chiefly benefited the wealthiest Americans.

But the president's contention that upper-income tax cuts primarily benefit entrepreneurs conflicts with some of the government's own data.

Democratic Sens. John F. Kerry (Mass.) and John Edwards (N.C.) have pledged to restore the top two income tax rates to a maximum of 39.6 percent if elected president, but Bush and Republican allies say such a move would disproportionately punish small businesses, most of which pay individual income tax rates on their profits.

~snip~

But under Treasury's definition, both Bush and Vice President Cheney are members of the entrepreneurial class. In his 2002 tax return, the president reported $1,549 from rental real estate, royalties, partnerships, S corporations and trusts, including income from GWB Rangers Corp., a remnant of his days as co-owner of the Texas Rangers. Of the Cheney household's $1.2 million income, $238,682 was from business ventures within the White House's definition of small business.

Economists say the broad Republican definition of "small-business man" includes not only doctors, lawyers and management consultants but also chief executives who earn $3,000 renting out their chalets in Aspen or report $10,000 in speaking fees. An aide on the Joint Economic Committee conceded that the definition includes the army of accountants and consultants at such giant partnerships as KPMG LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, not the firms that "small business" brings to mind.

~snip~

more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A488-2004Feb23?language=printer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buckeye1 Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bush lied again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Is making up lies a manufacturing job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Small Business" is another GOP Weasel Word
"Small Business" has positive connotations and when someone says it most people think "Mom and Pop" but it could mean practically anything this side of a 1000 person company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here's another great article - is the Press doing it's job?!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Dana Millbank
Millbank's been on top of Whistle Ass for a long time. He and Dick Meyer at CBS news are about the only ones. And Helen Thomas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ms_splash Donating Member (823 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, come on, he's not a mathmatician
or a statatician, or an accountant.

in fact, he wouldn't have passed Algebra I if it hadn't been for that nerdy kid who sat next to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. But, but, he's our first CEO, MBA president!
That just can't be true!

I'm shattered. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-04 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. "They're numbers haven't been right for 6 years why would they be now?"
Edited on Tue Feb-24-04 08:25 AM by underpants
-President Bill Clinton 1999
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC