|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 11:56 AM Original message |
Bailed-out banks eye toxic asset buys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marketcrazy1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
1. ”a new level of absurdity” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
2. not just absurd... illegal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sultana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
4. Obama's economic team of Rubinites are a disaster. Everyone sees it. Especially those profiting.(nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
5. The $700 billion bailout bill originally had a ban on the banks selling... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
6. Gotta love it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 04:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
33. The Geithner plan or the Paulson Bernanke plan, or both? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:13 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Im talking about the Geithner plan here (Paulson's more liberal plan is history) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
7. WHY? Why buy a pile of shit, other than fertilizer? WHY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 12:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Uh, don't you see. It makes perfect sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomm2thumbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
8. that is just TREASON!!!!!! now it is time to consider charges by the government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Charges? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomm2thumbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Definition of Treason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:08 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. But those are also good definitions for capitalism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alhena (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
9. Great- so hedge funds will game the system instead. We lose regardless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
11. good job corporate conservo dems! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
12. Look at this...it's related...and so distressing!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 12:59 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Yep, pair the two together and its just a scam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. Bottom line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:06 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Under PPIP the FDIC is going to determine the toxic asset values |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soothsayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. yup, this is a HUGE problem and a huge scam. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
15. I hope the PIPP prohibits these companies from participating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. They are the ones selling the assets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:09 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. It could be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:11 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Even if this wasn't true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:45 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. The FDIC not only indicated they would allow it.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. That seems to be a different issue from what I can tell from that snippet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. And I think everyone should be concerned... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
16. This used to be called securities fraud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheEuclideanOne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:28 PM Response to Original message |
26. Is this a loophole that nobody saw? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:00 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. No. People saw this coming. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 01:51 PM Response to Original message |
28. Okay, now I think I understand ....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Yes, but won't the banks still be insolvent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 06:12 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. No. They'll be fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 07:13 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Sooooooooo.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 07:24 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Well, if you had no moral consciousness... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 09:35 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. True. So very true. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheEuclideanOne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-04-09 07:33 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Sure, if you have no concience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArcticFox (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
29. F*** the banks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frylock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 04:52 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. shhhhhhhhhhh.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-03-09 07:16 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. Omg... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC