Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge: Bagram prisoners can challenge detention

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:39 AM
Original message
Judge: Bagram prisoners can challenge detention
Source: Salon

Politics
Judge: Bagram prisoners can challenge detention
By NEDRA PICKLER Associated Press Writer


Apr 2nd, 2009 | WASHINGTON -- A federal judge ruled on Thursday that prisoners in the war on terror can use U.S. civilian courts to challenge their detention at a military air base in Afghanistan.

U.S. District Judge John Bates turned down the United States' motion to deny the right to three foreign detainees at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled last year that detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have the right to challenge their detention in court. But the government had argued that it did not apply to those in Afghanistan.

Bates said the cases were essentially the same and he quoted the Supreme Court ruling repeatedly in his judgment and applied the test created by it to each detainee. It is the first time a federal judge has applied the ruling to detainees in Afghanistan.

Bates considered the requests of four detainees asking to be released, but he reserved judgment on one detainee, Haji Wazir, because he is an Afghan citizen and releasing him could create "practical obstacles in the form of friction with the host country." He ordered Wazir and the government to file memos addressing those issues.

Read more: http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/2009/04/02/D97ADTJO1_terror_detainees/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R, Excellent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. USA has been battling the Middle East for 2, - TWO decades with illegal wars and sanctions
.
.
.

Iran was of interest so the USA armed and convinced Saddam to make war on Iran.

That didn't pan out too good, so then the USA decided to make war on IRAQ!

even pushed successfully for the hanging of Saddam who was their puppet for a decade or so . .

NOW, the USA has over a dozen bases, and a couple of "fortresses" inside Iraq, the Green Zone and that almost billion dollar "embassy",

which is really just a fortress in someone else's' country.

USA is still in Japan/Germany, etc., after half a century.

They will still be in Iraq 50 years from now unless someone drops the USA from its superpower status/capability.

USA don't LEAVE - they occupy - they STAY.

POW and the Geneva Convention are obsolete ideas to the USA.

IRC (Red Cross) has been denied access to MANY of the USA's detention centres.

WHY? - because they do not want the proof to the World of their inhumane treatments to other humans.

It's that simple.

The USA will just keep trying to find other places out of sight of the masses to do their abusive interrogation/torture tactics.

That's how Empires work - they are "Above the Law"

get used to it

(sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GuyJello Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good. The Bush and Obama admin. argued that they were not entitled to habeas corpus
Victory for justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC