Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bremer says no elections for 12-15 months (This is a huge surprise. Not.)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 11:34 PM
Original message
Bremer says no elections for 12-15 months (This is a huge surprise. Not.)
Bremer says no elections for 12-15 months
February 21, 2004 (RTE News)

Paul Bremer says it will be impossible to organise elections in Iraq for another year to 15 months for technical reasons.
(What? Technical problems? Can't they just ship some BBV electronic voting machines in? Those'll fix yer "election problems" in a jiffy)
Al-Arabiya television broadcast excerpts from an interview with the US civilian administrator this morning.

Mr Bremer noted the absence in Iraq of voter lists or legislation covering elections and political parties as, he said, a visiting UN team highlighted last week.

The article goes on to report on three Americans getting killed by Iraqis who, for some reason, are pissed off at us. I really wish they'd quit killing our soldiers and start doing something useful, instead.


"Jerry, you're lookin' a little fuzzy there"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wasn't Saddam able to get everyone to vote last year?
True, he won in a landslide (:-)) but the point is they can carry out an election...why not now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-04 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Reported Twice In LBN Over The Last Two Days - This Is Old News!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carols Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. In the US or in Iraq?
These days you have to ask...
Carol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. No elections til the oil is gone.
You wouldn't want an Islamic republic there.

Besides the sick element of society couldn't be hired as trained killers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bremer will resign ala David Kay. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
et in Arcadia ego... Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Can't the U.S. Supreme Court just put someone in office over there...
you know, like they did with Bush? Surely it's the SUPREME COURT OF THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD now. Like, who needs elections... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. The "technical problems" are lack of security (US forces)
The Bushies are going to keep the troops under lock and key until after the election. Imagine nearly 1,000 US dead, with 850 of them since "Mission Accomplished," in November. Wouldn't play well at the polls.

That 1,000 stat is based on current averages. If the Iraqi partisans were to succeed in repeating the Beruit attack (under Reagan), Bush would be instant SOS (shit on a shingle).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Summer is coming, and the heat is on
The War ain't over til the Berka Lady sings.

And I guess she ain't allowed to even hum a few bars!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
California Democrat Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. Whats the problem?
Is a year and a half really unreasonable?

After all, we're still waiting for the first free election in Bosnia.....How many years has that been going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Good question, CaliDem. The answer is "no and yes."
Is a year and a half really unreasonable?

Yes. Given the current state of affairs, it wouldn't make much sense to just pull an election out of our collective hats and turbans and then hope for the best. There'd be lots of questions about fraud, legitimacy, and fair counts--not to mention the possibility of the usual election related bloodshed that we'd want to prevent. But...

NO. "Given the current state of affairs" is the critical phrase here. The Bushies did not plan to have elections until the last minute. The issue was, is, and will remain their sorry lack of planning in carrying out this stupid, illegal occupation. They didn't put stuff in the works to create a legitimizing Iraqi election until about two months ago.

Before then they were happy to ignore the drip drip drip of American (and coalition, and Iraqi) deaths because all they really planned for was how to kayo Saddam and how to secure the oil fields. They let Halliburton worry about how to feed the troops ("just send me the bill, guys") and let the troops worry about how not to be shot at.

It would be reasonable for them to have had a plan to establish democracy from the gitgo, given their justifications for the war. But they didn't think about that until they started getting clobbered by a suddenly Deanified Democratic Party. They were like "oh shit, tell Jerry Bremer to get some elections going over there before the summer conventions. Stat!"

The situation in Bosnia is a little bit more complicated. Even if it was a showboat election, Iraq did manage to carry out a legal election just four months before we invaded them. That infrastructure would have still been in place after we conquered the joint in April 03. The Bush adminstrations just didn't give a flip about it until now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC